UN report calls for decriminalization of all sexual activity, including between adults and children

[Coyote]

It's the U.N.

Exactly. That’s why the OP is likely fake.

 

[deannalw]

It’s the GatewayPundit…

What about the first link? That ain't Gateway Pundit...

 

[Dogmaphobe]

"With respect to the enforcement of criminal law, any prescribed minimum age of consent to sex must be applied in a non-discriminatory manner. Enforcement may not be linked to the sex/gender of participants or age of consent to marriage. Moreover, sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual, in fact, if not in law. In this context, the enforcement of criminal law should reflect the rights and capacity of persons under 18 years of age to make decisions about engaging in consensual sexual conduct and their right to be heard in matters concerning them."

"Pursuant to their evolving capacities and progressive autonomy, persons under 18 years of age should participate in decisions affecting them, with due regard to their age, maturity and best interests, and with specific attention to non-discrimination guarantees."

So, what the U.N. is saying is that as long as a child CONSENTS to the sex, the child predation is just fine. All the groomers now need to do is groom the children to the point they believe themselves to be willing participants.

USMB has sure been ahead of the curve on this one, hasn't it. No wonder there has been a crackdown on using the term groomer to describe groomers here. When a pedophile succeeds in grooming a child to the point they accept the pedophilia, they win, and by taking away the term that describes the process, USMB advances the objective of those who want to have sex with children.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Pull the exact quote from the UN 8 march principles that claim what you claim...

Final version of the the so-called 8 March Principles...page #22...

https://icj2.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/8-MARCH-Principles-FINAL-printer-version-1-MARCH-2023.pdf

 

[Thunk]

What about the first link? That ain't Gateway Pundit...

I told ya they can't read...they can't even count to two.

 

[Natural Citizen]

What about the first link? That ain't Gateway Pundit...

People who choose to attack sources rather than engage in debate or discussion germane to the actual content are often intellectual weaklings, incapable and/or fearful of legitimate dialogue.

 

[Moonglow]

Final version of the the so-called 8 March Principles...

https://icj2.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/8-MARCH-Principles-FINAL-printer-version-1-MARCH-2023.pdf

Why did you not post the entire statement?

persons under 18 years of age to make decisions about engaging in consensual sexual conduct and their right to be heard in matters concerning them. Pursuant to their evolving capacities and progressive autonomy, persons under 18 years of age should participate in decisions affecting them, with due regard to their age, maturity and best interests, and with specific attention to non-discrimination guarantees.

Again, I see no action of the UN to make anything legal but the right to be heard.

 

[deannalw]

Why did you not post the entire page?

You asked for a quote regarding that issue.

 

[deannalw]

People who achoose to attack sources rather than engage in debate or discussion germane to the actual content are often intellectual weaklings.

Or they know their argument is boneless.

 

[Thunk]

Why did you not post the entire statement?

Nothing will ever be good enough. That's why I don't bother to reply to BS like that.

I don't even thunk moonglow is human...it's a bot.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Why did you not post the entire statement?

I linked the entire report. And provided the page number, along with a screenshot of the relevant part.

Put your bong down and read it...

 

[Moonglow]

Nothing will ever be good enough. That's why I don't bother to reply to BS like that.

I don't even thunk moonglow is human...it's a bot.

Your inability is noted.

 

[Moonglow]

I linked the entire report.

Put your bong down and read it...

I already have days ago which is how I know it's bogus. You see other people already posted said article you folks is just slow.

 

[Seymour Flops]

This is why DemoMAPs are so eager to hand US sovereignty to the UN. Not just about doing kids but all the goals they hold dear but could never get by the voters.

In other words, now that Trump gave the USSC back to constitutionalists they want a "higher court" to do their bidding.

 

[Natural Citizen]

You asked for a quote regarding that issue.

 

[Coyote]

"With respect to the enforcement of criminal law, any prescribed minimum age of consent to sex must be applied in a non-discriminatory manner. Enforcement may not be linked to the sex/gender of participants or age of consent to marriage. Moreover, sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual, in fact, if not in law. In this context, the enforcement of criminal law should reflect the rights and capacity of persons under 18 years of age to make decisions about engaging in consensual sexual conduct and their right to be heard in matters concerning them."

"Pursuant to their evolving capacities and progressive autonomy, persons under 18 years of age should participate in decisions affecting them, with due regard to their age, maturity and best interests, and with specific attention to non-discrimination guarantees."

So, what the U.N. is saying is that as long as a child CONSENTS to the sex, the child predation is just fine. All the groomers now need to do is groom the children to the point they believe themselves to be willing participants.

USMB has sure been ahead of the curve on this one, hasn't it. No wonder there has been a crackdown on using the term groomer to describe groomers here. When a pedophile succeeds in grooming a child to the point they accept the pedophilia, they win, and by taking away the term that describes the process, USMB advances the objective of those who want to have sex with children.

Not exactly. It states in the beginning, under it’s principles:

consensual sexual activities, including in such context as sex outside marriage; same-sex sexual relations, adolescent sexual activity and sex work;


adolescents’ evolving capacity to consent in certain contexts, in fact, even if not
in law, when they are below the prescribed minimum age of consent in domestic
law;

and further down

PRINCIPLE 11 – LIMITATIONS ON CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR PERSONS UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE
No one under the age of 18 may be held criminally liable for any conduct that does not constitute a criminal offence if committed by a person who is 18 or older.

It seems to be stating that adolescents should not be held criminally accountable. There was a case in the news a while ago where an adolescent who had been sexually trafficked was also held criminally liable along with her trafficker.

 

[Coyote]

Keep protecting those pedo's there coyote!

Why don’t you read the actual report?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Not exactly. It states in the beginning, under it’s principles:

consensual sexual activities, including in such context as sex outside marriage; same-sex sexual relations, adolescent sexual activity and sex work;


adolescents’ evolving capacity to consent in certain contexts, in fact, even if not
in law, when they are below the prescribed minimum age of consent in domestic
law;

and further down

PRINCIPLE 11 – LIMITATIONS ON CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR PERSONS UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE
No one under the age of 18 may be held criminally liable for any conduct that does not constitute a criminal offence if committed by a person who is 18 or older.

It seems to be stating that adolescents should not be held criminally accountable. There was a case in the news a while ago where an adolescent who had been sexually trafficked was also held criminally liable along with her trafficker.

Back, when the Rotherham Pakistani Rape gang issue was current, a poster named frigidweirdo said that the children were not actually raped, and were indulging in consensual sex, instead. He said the men were just "tapping" these girls who were as young as 11. You agreed with this poster and defended him.

This U.N. bill just plays into the hands of people like you who treat horrific levels of predation (and in the case of the Pakistanis, racism,) as a matter of consent by using the fallacy that the child victims of grooming are consenting to their own rape.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Your own attitudes regarding children and sex are quite well known, here.

Please elaborate. I dare you

 

[MisterBeale]

Locked and cleaned thread.

Please keep all posts on topic, do not derail thread, and stop making straw man attacks on other members.

Warnings have been issued, and the thread will be moved to the badlands if this continues.