UN chief admits bias against Israel

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

It depends on who's definition you use.

P F Tinmore;

OK stop this.


(COMMENT)

No, there were rocket attacks yesterday.

Most Respectfully,
R

Outside of Palestine?

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinian Terrorist uses the definition as outline in the HAMAS Covenant and FATAH Charter (PNA). Therefore, under their twisted understanding, the answer is NO.

If you use international law, the answer is YES.

Every State has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate the existing international boundaries of another State or as a means of solving international disputes, including territorial disputes and problems concerning frontiers of States.

Every State likewise has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate international lines of demarcation, such as armistice lines, established by or pursuant to an international agreement to which it is a party or which it is otherwise bound to respect.

Most Respectfully,
R

What international law would that be? You have still not provided any documents showing where Israel legally acquired that land.

 

[Roudy]

United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon met with students at the UN headquarters in Jerusalem on Friday afternoon, and admitted that his organization was biased against Israel.

Responding to a student who said Israelis felt their country was discriminated against in the international organization, Ban confirmed that there was a biased attitude towards the Israeli people and Israeli government, stressing that it was "an unfortunate situation."

UN chief admits bias against Israel - Israel News, Ynetnews

---------

Tell us something we don't know

OMG what a surprise. I am like totally shocked t this revelation.

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

The Arab Palestinian did not defend anything.

P F Tinmore, et al,

Another trick question.

Rocco,
Does this mean that when the foreign Jewish Agency declared Israel to be a state it had no defined territory and no population?

(COMMENT)

No, it was a fully coordinated plan.

Most Respectfully,
R

Indeed it was, and the Palestinians defended themselves from that plan all through the mandate period and up through today.

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinian was a xenophobic anti-Government organization.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

You keep going in circles.

P F Tinmore, et al,

It depends on who's definition you use.

Outside of Palestine?

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinian Terrorist uses the definition as outline in the HAMAS Covenant and FATAH Charter (PNA). Therefore, under their twisted understanding, the answer is NO.

If you use international law, the answer is YES.

Every State has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate the existing international boundaries of another State or as a means of solving international disputes, including territorial disputes and problems concerning frontiers of States.

Every State likewise has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate international lines of demarcation, such as armistice lines, established by or pursuant to an international agreement to which it is a party or which it is otherwise bound to respect.

Most Respectfully,
R

What international law would that be? You have still not provided any documents showing where Israel legally acquired that land.

(COMMENT)

I'm not going though that again.

While there has been plenty of documentation and discussion on the establishment of the State of Israel, there has been nothing on the establishment of the State of Palestine.

The Palestinian had what?

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

You keep going in circles.

P F Tinmore, et al,

It depends on who's definition you use.


(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinian Terrorist uses the definition as outline in the HAMAS Covenant and FATAH Charter (PNA). Therefore, under their twisted understanding, the answer is NO.

If you use international law, the answer is YES.



Most Respectfully,
R

What international law would that be? You have still not provided any documents showing where Israel legally acquired that land.

(COMMENT)

I'm not going though that again.

While there has been plenty of documentation and discussion on the establishment of the State of Israel, there has been nothing on the establishment of the State of Palestine.

The Palestinian had what?

Most Respectfully,
R

Still ducking that question?

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

The Arab Palestinian did not defend anything.

P F Tinmore, et al,

Another trick question.


(COMMENT)

No, it was a fully coordinated plan.

Most Respectfully,
R

Indeed it was, and the Palestinians defended themselves from that plan all through the mandate period and up through today.

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinian was a xenophobic anti-Government organization.

Most Respectfully,
R

Anti whose government?
----------
How can you say they are anti government? They have two governments.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon met with students at the UN headquarters in Jerusalem on Friday afternoon, and admitted that his organization was biased against Israel.

Responding to a student who said Israelis felt their country was discriminated against in the international organization, Ban confirmed that there was a biased attitude towards the Israeli people and Israeli government, stressing that it was "an unfortunate situation."

UN chief admits bias against Israel - Israel News, Ynetnews

---------

Tell us something we don't know

Israel is a fascist state that regularly attacks it's neighbors and practices apartheid in it's own backyard.

Yet, the jewish citizens can't seem to figure out why the majority of the UN membership nations don't like their country.

Wrong. The Jewish citizens know first hand the propaganda thrown at them by the long lost palestinians who didn't know their own names until 1960. (* HA! ) It is time for the leader of the United Nations to admit there has been crimes commited against Israel by the UN. Monetary damages should be paid to the Israelis in my opinion. As to the UN. They are one of the most corrupt organizations on earth. It looks like after the slaughter of christians in Egypt and Syria the UN Leader from S. Korea realizes the Muslim brotherhood are some of the biggest criminals in the Middle East and Israel has good reason to be ready for a change of policy..

As he is from South Korea he probably is thinking more about what it is to live next to a hostile, nutcase neighbor - Kim Jong I's son is on other side of his border.. I'm glad he knows what its like to have the world buddy up to the nation trying to wipe you off the face of the earth. Still you cannot trust the UN as they are probably using the statement for selfish purposes that won't help Israel at all.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

P F Tinmore, et al,

You keep going in circles.

What international law would that be? You have still not provided any documents showing where Israel legally acquired that land.

(COMMENT)

I'm not going though that again.

While there has been plenty of documentation and discussion on the establishment of the State of Israel, there has been nothing on the establishment of the State of Palestine.

The Palestinian had what?

Most Respectfully,
R

Still ducking that question?

Why are YOU still ducking the question, Tinmore? The Palestinians had what? Show us what these long lost Palestinians that only "discovered" their name in 1960 had? What was it?

Did the Russians ever cover that part of the story line they wrote for Arafat while he was being trained in propaganda at Baleshinka Special ops school? Or was Arafat absent that day?

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

P F Tinmore, et al,

You keep going in circles.

P F Tinmore, et al,

It depends on who's definition you use.


(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinian Terrorist uses the definition as outline in the HAMAS Covenant and FATAH Charter (PNA). Therefore, under their twisted understanding, the answer is NO.

If you use international law, the answer is YES.



Most Respectfully,
R

What international law would that be? You have still not provided any documents showing where Israel legally acquired that land.

(COMMENT)

I'm not going though that again.

While there has been plenty of documentation and discussion on the establishment of the State of Israel, there has been nothing on the establishment of the State of Palestine.

The Palestinian had what?

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Another trick question.

Rocco,
Does this mean that when the foreign Jewish Agency declared Israel to be a state it had no defined territory and no population?

(COMMENT)

No, it was a fully coordinated plan.

Most Respectfully,
R

Indeed it was, and the Palestinians defended themselves from that plan all through the mandate period and up through today.

There is no such thing as a Palestinian. Those are arabs trying to steal Israeli land.

-Jeri

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

P F Tinmore;

OK stop this.

P F Tinmore, et al,

This is another trick question. You know very well that the definition of "terrorism" is not universally accepted.


(OBSERVATION)

The United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy is NOT a "Treaty" or "Convention."

Palestine became a State in 1988.

(COMMENT)

Most acts of Terrorism committed by Palestinian elements are committed inside a sovereignty that has domestic laws that cover the offense. For instance, the attack in 1972 on the Olympics Games in Munich, in which 11 members of the Israeli Olympic team were killed, along with a German police officer, was committed by Palestinian group known as Black September (a small cell of Fatah). While the Palestinian may call it anything it wants and justify it in any manner it wants, it is part of an establish behavior internationally known as terrorism. Even the Hashemite Kingdom considered them terrorists.

Most Respectfully,
R

Most acts of Terrorism committed by Palestinian elements are committed inside a sovereignty that has domestic laws that cover the offense. For instance, the attack in 1972...

And 1972 is the most recent?

(COMMENT)

No, there were rocket attacks yesterday.

Most Respectfully,
R

Your honesty is so refreshing, R. It's always a pleasure reading your posts. - Jeri

 

[editec]

The United Nations has no shortage of national governments who are not big fans of Israel, that is surely true.

Since its founding in 1948, the United Nations Security Council, as of January 2010, has adopted 79 resolutions directly critical of Israel for violations of U.N. Security Council resolutions, the U.N. Charter, the Geneva Conventions, international terrorism, or other violations of international law.

 

[abu afak]

What is the evidence that the United Nations is biased against Israel?
http://www.palestinefacts.org/pf_faq_palestine_un_anti_israel_bias.php

".....In an analysis of the Security Council's record up to 1989, of 175 total resolutions passed by the Council, 97 were directed against Israel, as contrasted with 4 against all Arab states combined.
The Council expressed its 'concern,' 'grave concern,' 'regret,' 'deep regrets,' 'shock' etc. about Israeli actions 31 times. Regarding Arab actions, the Council Never expressed negative sentiments.
Only the veto power of the US prevented these numbers from being even more One-sided against Israel.

Because it has been blocked from membership in any regional group, Israel is the only nation in the world that is denied the right to hold a seat on the UN Security Council on a rotating basis....."

".......In the years 1947 to 1989, the General Assembly passed a total of 690 resolutions (full or partial). Of these, 429 were against the Israeli position while only 56 were against Arab positions. Of the 56 votes not to the Arabs' liking, 49 concerned the establishment or financing of peace-keeping forces.
Absent these, the last anti-Arab vote in the General Assembly, on any issue, was in May of 1949....."

"....The UN has repeatedly held Emergency Special Sessions of the General Assembly on Israeli construction in Jerusalem.
The Emergency Special Session was originally convened in 1950 for emergencies like the Korean War. In the last 15 years, these special meetings have only been held regarding Israel.
Emergency Special Sessions were NOT convened over the Genocide in Rwanda, ethnic cleansing in the former Yugoslavia, or with regard to the other major world conflicts, but they were convened to condemn Israelis moving into buildings they own in territory they have a legitimate claim to...."

The UN (and it's 57 Muslim Nation Bloc vote) makes Israel it main Focus.
The whole system is Rigged against Israel.

Cont'd
-

 

[abu afak]

'Unispal' sounds official UN (So it is).. but it's written by palestinians and might as well be written by their government/s. Whatever their govt is at this moment.

Here's a lesser Known RIG JOB in the UN Human Rights Nightmare:

UNISPAL - UN in the service of Arab propaganda

".......The Department of Political Affairs [DPA] is one of a dozen Departments associated with the UN Secretariate. Its mission statement is so broad, as to cover any conceivable topic.
Little wonder, then, that the Palestinian propaganda machine monopolized an entire Division within the DPA, namely, the “ Division for Palestinian Rights [DPR]” .
Each of the 7 Other Divisions within the DPA is GENERAL, e.g., “Americas and Europe Division”, “Asia and the Pacific Division”, etc.
But the Palestinians were going to settle for nothing less than an entire Division - and they got it,
confirming the assessment that the UN is a “wholly-owned subsidiary of the Arab League”.

The mandate of the DPR is as follows:

Providing substantive support and secretariat services for the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People and its Bureau;

Assisting the Committee in the exercise of its mandate and the promotion and implementation of its recommendations;

Planning, organizing and servicing the Committee’s programme of international meetings;

Consulting and maintaining liaison with NGOs which are active on the issue;

*Organizing the annual commemoration of the International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People;

*Preparing studies and publications relating to the question of Palestine and the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people;

Promoting the widest possible dissemination of these studies and publications, including in cooperation with the Department of Public Information;

Maintaining and developing the computer-based United Nations Information System on the Question of Palestine (UNISPAL).​

Paraphrased, the mandate of the DPR is to generate and disseminate Palestinian propaganda, using UNISPAL as a vector.
In its campaign, the DPR uses as conduits a list of NGOs that runs for 11 screen pages, with approximately 250 NGO’s listed.

Of special interest is the “Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People”, established in 1975, the year of the infamous “Zionism = Racism” resolution......"

The DPR Octopus has many other tentacles as well, one being the organization of international conferences for the dissemination of Palestinian propaganda. As the DPR calendar of events indicates, in the quarter April - June, 2002 alone, the DPR held three international conferences. In this context one should also note the “International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People”, held annually by DPR on November 29 - the very date in 1947 on which the UN voted for the establishment of Israel......"

IsraPundit

Quite remarkable really.
'Europe AND the AmericaS' ONE division! (from Nicaragua to Bosnia to Chile to Venezuela to Serbia to Germany to Guantanamo)
'Asia and the Pacific' .... (From China to North Korea to Tibet to Burma to Indonesia to Philippines) One division!
but the Tiny 'palestinians' get a whole one 1/7 of the planet for themselves.
Not just a division but an Advocacy organization. Any "Days of Solidarity" for the Tibetans or Kurds or anyone else?
Just part of the Vast anti-Israel Bureaucracy called the UN.
-

 

[Billo_Really]

What is the evidence that the United Nations is biased against Israel?
http://www.palestinefacts.org/pf_faq_palestine_un_anti_israel_bias.php

".....In an analysis of the Security Council's record up to 1989, of 175 total resolutions passed by the Council, 97 were directed against Israel, as contrasted with 4 against all Arab states combined.
The Council expressed its 'concern,' 'grave concern,' 'regret,' 'deep regrets,' 'shock' etc. about Israeli actions 31 times. Regarding Arab actions, the Council Never expressed negative sentiments.
Only the veto power of the US prevented these numbers from being even more One-sided against Israel.

Because it has been blocked from membership in any regional group, Israel is the only nation in the world that is denied the right to hold a seat on the UN Security Council on a rotating basis....."

".......In the years 1947 to 1989, the General Assembly passed a total of 690 resolutions (full or partial). Of these, 429 were against the Israeli position while only 56 were against Arab positions. Of the 56 votes not to the Arabs' liking, 49 concerned the establishment or financing of peace-keeping forces.
Absent these, the last anti-Arab vote in the General Assembly, on any issue, was in May of 1949....."

"....The UN has repeatedly held Emergency Special Sessions of the General Assembly on Israeli construction in Jerusalem.
The Emergency Special Session was originally convened in 1950 for emergencies like the Korean War. In the last 15 years, these special meetings have only been held regarding Israel.
Emergency Special Sessions were NOT convened over the Genocide in Rwanda, ethnic cleansing in the former Yugoslavia, or with regard to the other major world conflicts, but they were convened to condemn Israelis moving into buildings they own in territory they have a legitimate claim to...."

The UN (and it's 57 Muslim Nation Bloc vote) makes Israel it main Focus.
The whole system is Rigged against Israel.

Cont'd
-

Israel does not have a legitimate claim to the territory they are moving into buildings. That is land that was siezed during a war. And it is against the law, to hold onto land taken in a war. Conquer by conquest has been outlawed since the end of WWII. That is why Israel has so many resolutions against it. The amount of resolutions, is more of an indication of just how much wrongdoing Israel has done, than it is a case of bias.

You would figure Israel would catch the clue by now, after 47 years, not a single country on the planet has recognized Israel's right to that land. Not one! Allowing Israel to keep that land, is like telling Hitler it's okay to annex Poland and that ain't gonna happen!

 

[abu afak]

The UNRWA is 4x Larger than the rest of the UN's whole refugee apparatus that Should serve the whole world.
It has Hogged the the planet's ability to take care of other Real refugees such as World by eating 80% of refugee resources.
And of course it's just another tool/political football used against Israel and inhibits peace.
It has made a mole hill into a mountain by not disolving easrly on.

Similar but not as egregious anti-Israel Warping exist in the UN Human Rights apparatus (see above) where Palestinians alone have their own department (1 of just 7) that is on a par with say, All of East Asia (China, NK, Mynamar, etc, etc)

http://blogs.cfr.org/abrams/2011/12/19/ending-unrwa-and-advancing-peace/
Ending UNRWA and Advancing Peace
by Elliott Abrams
December 19, 2011

Since the end of the Second World War, millions of refugees have left refugee camps, and refugee status, and moved to countries that accepted them–quickly or slowly–as citizens. Post-World War II Europe was an archipelago of displaced persons and refugee camps, housing 850,000 people in 1947–Czechs, Poles, Lithuanians, Germans, Latvians, Greeks, and many more nationalities.
By 1952, all but one of the camps had closed. Hundred of thousands of Jewish refugees from Europe went to Israel after 1948, and then hundreds of thousands more arrived from Arab lands when they were forced to flee after 1956 and 1967. The children and grandchildren of these refugees, born after their arrival, were never refugees themselves; they were from birth citizens of the new land, as their parents had become immediately upon their own arrival. In this process many nations and agencies have played wonderful roles, not least the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

The exception to this refugee story is the Palestinians. In most of the Arab lands to which they fled or travelled after 1948 they were often treated badly, and refused citizenship (with Jordan the major exception) or even the right to work legally. And instead of coming under the protection of UNHCR, they had a SPECIAL agency of their own, UNRWA, the UN Relief and Works Agency. In the decades of its existence, it has not solved or even diminished the Palesinian refugee problem; instead it has presided over a massive increase in its size, for all the descendants of Palestinian refugees are considered to be refugees as well.

Once there were 750,000; now there are Five Million people considered by UNRWA to be “Palestinian refugees.”
And UNRWA is now the largest UN agency, with a staff of 30,000.
UNHCR cares for the rest of the world with about 7,500 personnel.

The political background to this story is simple: Only in the case of Israel was there a determined refusal to accept what had happened during and after World War II,".."
-

So you see, Top to Bottom, the UN is Wildly and STRUCTURALLY Rigged against Israel
-

 

[P F Tinmore]

The insanity must stop.
The UNRWA is 4x Larger than the rest of the UN's whole refugee apparatus that Should serve the whole world.
It has Hogged the the planet's ability to take care of other Real refugees such as World by eating 80% of refugee resources.
And of course it's just another tool/political football used against Israel and inhibits peace.
It has made a mole hill into a mountain by not disolving easrly on.

http://blogs.cfr.org/abrams/2011/12/19/ending-unrwa-and-advancing-peace/
Ending UNRWA and Advancing Peace
by Elliott Abrams
December 19, 2011

Similar but not as egregious anti-Israel Warping exist in the UN Human Rights apparatus (see above) where Palestinians alone have their own department (1 of just 7) that is on a par with say, All of East Asia (China, NK, Mynamar, etc, etc) in size.

Since the end of the Second World War, millions of refugees have left refugee camps, and refugee status, and moved to countries that accepted them–quickly or slowly–as citizens. Post-World War II Europe was an archipelago of displaced persons and refugee camps, housing 850,000 people in 1947–Czechs, Poles, Lithuanians, Germans, Latvians, Greeks, and many more nationalities.
By 1952, all but one of the camps had closed. Hundred of thousands of Jewish refugees from Europe went to Israel after 1948, and then hundreds of thousands more arrived from Arab lands when they were forced to flee after 1956 and 1967. The children and grandchildren of these refugees, born after their arrival, were never refugees themselves; they were from birth citizens of the new land, as their parents had become immediately upon their own arrival. In this process many nations and agencies have played wonderful roles, not least the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

The exception to this refugee story is the Palestinians. In most of the Arab lands to which they fled or travelled after 1948 they were often treated badly, and refused citizenship (with Jordan the major exception) or even the right to work legally. And instead of coming under the protection of UNHCR, they had a special agency of their own, UNRWA, the UN Relief and Works Agency. In the decades of its existence, it has not solved or even diminished the Palesinian refugee problem; instead it has presided over a massive increase in its size, for all the descendants of Palestinian refugees are considered to be refugees as well.

Once there were 750,000; now there are Five Million people considered by UNRWA to be “Palestinian refugees.”
And UNRWA is now the largest UN agency, with a staff of 30,000.
UNHCR cares for the rest of the world with about 7,500 personnel.

The political background to this story is simple: Only in the case of Israel was there a determined refusal to accept what had happened during and after World War II,".."
-

So you see, Top to Bottom, the UN is Wildly and STRUCTURALLY Rigged against Israel
-

The UNRWA is 4x Larger than the rest of the UN's whole refugee apparatus that Should serve the whole world.

The right of return would solve that problem.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

What is the evidence that the United Nations is biased against Israel?
What is the evidence that the United Nations is biased against Israel?

".....In an analysis of the Security Council's record up to 1989, of 175 total resolutions passed by the Council, 97 were directed against Israel, as contrasted with 4 against all Arab states combined.
The Council expressed its 'concern,' 'grave concern,' 'regret,' 'deep regrets,' 'shock' etc. about Israeli actions 31 times. Regarding Arab actions, the Council Never expressed negative sentiments.
Only the veto power of the US prevented these numbers from being even more One-sided against Israel.

Because it has been blocked from membership in any regional group, Israel is the only nation in the world that is denied the right to hold a seat on the UN Security Council on a rotating basis....."

".......In the years 1947 to 1989, the General Assembly passed a total of 690 resolutions (full or partial). Of these, 429 were against the Israeli position while only 56 were against Arab positions. Of the 56 votes not to the Arabs' liking, 49 concerned the establishment or financing of peace-keeping forces.
Absent these, the last anti-Arab vote in the General Assembly, on any issue, was in May of 1949....."

"....The UN has repeatedly held Emergency Special Sessions of the General Assembly on Israeli construction in Jerusalem.
The Emergency Special Session was originally convened in 1950 for emergencies like the Korean War. In the last 15 years, these special meetings have only been held regarding Israel.
Emergency Special Sessions were NOT convened over the Genocide in Rwanda, ethnic cleansing in the former Yugoslavia, or with regard to the other major world conflicts, but they were convened to condemn Israelis moving into buildings they own in territory they have a legitimate claim to...."

The UN (and it's 57 Muslim Nation Bloc vote) makes Israel it main Focus.
The whole system is Rigged against Israel.

Cont'd
-

Israel does not have a legitimate claim to the territory they are moving into buildings. That is land that was siezed during a war. And it is against the law, to hold onto land taken in a war. Conquer by conquest has been outlawed since the end of WWII. That is why Israel has so many resolutions against it. The amount of resolutions, is more of an indication of just how much wrongdoing Israel has done, than it is a case of bias.

You would figure Israel would catch the clue by now, after 47 years, not a single country on the planet has recognized Israel's right to that land. Not one! Allowing Israel to keep that land, is like telling Hitler it's okay to annex Poland and that ain't gonna happen!

This might not be an answer to this specific post, but I have to say something. You have a very simplistic approach to this whole conflict. Israel should just get out of the West Bank, the conflict would be solved, and that's it--according to you, loinboy. You have never been to Israel and you don't know how small it is. Even if Israel might have nukes, it would obviously only use them as a last resort. When Israel left Gaza and Lebanon, they were inundated by rockets. Israel has to negotiate a withdrawal that would not leave it vulnerable to such attacks. This takes time. And your simplistic solution to the conflict doesn't take into account that there are still many people who would like to destroy Israel. Even on this Board, Tinmore would like to see all of Israel replaced by Palestine, and not just the West Bank. So Israel has to proceed with caution and not just get the f*** out. That's not the real world.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

/

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

There is no reason to believe this to be true.

The right of return would solve that problem.

(QUESTION)

In what way have the Arab Palestinians demonstrated in word or deed that they would, in any way, return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbors?

This is an infiltration measure to destroy Israel from the inside-out.

(REMEMBERING)

NOW JAFFA IS UNDER ARAB COMMANDER FROM ABROAD WHO STOPPED PEACE TALKS WHEN COMMANDER TOLD BY MAYOR OF JAFFA THAT WITHOUT AGREEMENT JAFFA WILL BE ENTIRELY DESTROYED HE ANSWERED, ‘I DO NOT MIND DESTRUCTION OF JAFFA IF WE SECURE DESTRUCTION OF TEL AVIV.’

SOURCE: A/AC.21/JA/16 16 February 1948

• There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad.
• Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine.
• “The only way to establish partition is first to wipe them out – man women and child.

One must be very careful in such situations.

"The Palestinian resistance requires the Palestinian people to remain united under the resistance banner, and it [the resistance] has the right to smite with an iron fist any hand that seeks to rip apart the people's unity and [cause it to] abandon its rights. It must also pursue the agents of the occupation wherever they may be, even outside Palestine, because leaving them in peace damages the Palestinian cause and places the Palestinian people, its leadership, and its resistance in grave danger.

"The resistance may find itself forced to attack the enemy's interests and senior officials outside the occupied territory. It is incumbent upon the honorable countries to stand alongside the occupied Palestinian people and assist it in removing the obstacles that stand in its way. By doing so, they [will be acting] in accordance with the principle of the right of peoples to self-determination, and in accordance with international decisions condemning the occupation and encouraging resistance to it by all means.

SOURCE: THE RESISTANCE IS ENTITLED TO ATTACK ISRAEL'S EMBASSIES, INTERESTS, AND OFFICIALS WORLDWIDE -- AND THE INTERESTS OF ITS ALLIES, HEADED BY THE U.S.

Most Respectfully,
R