beautress
Always Faithful
Let's hope not. I am hoping that President Putin will change his tune in favor of the many people who love their country, the Ukraine. His respect t would skyrocket should peace without war become his aim.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let's hope not. I am hoping that President Putin will change his tune in favor of the many people who love their country, the Ukraine. His respect t would skyrocket should peace without war become his aim.
It's NATO that needs to change its tune, not Russia which has watched as NATO increasingly surround Russia's border with armed forces, this was all understood after the Berlin wall came down, Russia was led to believe that NATO would not expand East but it has.Let's hope not. I am hoping that President Putin will change his tune in favor of the many people who love their country, the Ukraine. His respect t would skyrocket should peace without war become his aim.
Hope is not enough. If the West wants to defeat Russia and ready to start an actual, hot war - Russia will attack first.Let's hope not. I am hoping that President Putin will change his tune in favor of the many people who love their country, the Ukraine. His respect t would skyrocket should peace without war become his aim.
Why? He wants to leave Trump a nuclear war.
6 misses launched. After putins warnings, where does this lead?
Why is biden escalating this close to a new administration?
Hope and prayers rule the goodness of peace on earth, Zev. I'm headed for my prayer closet. Don't forget, the great state of Russia is historically Christian Orthodox and they can be reasoned with. But like us, they have a few warmongers. I pray for Russia's deep respect for peace when the chips are down. All men are brothers. May our leaders go for brotherhood with a peaceful Russian thumbs up for peace. Prayer closet, here I come. Love, beautressHope is not enough. If the West wants to defeat Russia and ready to start an actual, hot war - Russia will attack first.
Love is good. But without neutrality, denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine there will be no peace.Hope and prayers rule the goodness of peace on earth, Zev. I'm headed for my prayer closet. Don't forget, the great state of Russia is historically Christian Orthodox and they can be reasoned with. But like us, they have a few warmongers. I pray for Russia's deep respect for peace when the chips are down. All men are brothers. May our leaders go for brotherhood with a peaceful Russian thumbs up for peace. Prayer closet, here I come. Love, beautress
The European NATO incl. Canada outspends Russia on it's military budget by 8:1, continuously since 1990/91 - totally independent of how much the USA is spending to maintain it's own global hegemony and whining about those 2% from Europe.It's conceivable that Russia would attack a European puppet NATO state to indicate that lines are being crossed. Trump has already said he would not let the US get dragged into a response, that Russian can do as it wants and not fear a US response.
This is something that could unfold after Trump's inauguration to both drive home to Europe what's at stake and to show the US that Russia is serious and so best keep out of this as Trump already said he would.
Once European states realize that the US is not going to honor the NATO treaty, then they will have to acknowledge that Ukraine is lost and simply stop the antagonism, stop arming Ukraine and just abandon the project which was ridiculous to begin with and hast cost the EU about 65 billion dollars already, a total waste of money.
No logical relationship at all.And America attacked Vietnam (at least it was the "worlds opinion"). But there is the difference between Russian missiles shooting down US planes in Vietnam sky and the Russian missiles attacking US bases on US soil. As well as there is the difference between Iranian missiles attacking US ships in the Red sea, and Russian missiles (launched from some HAMAS barges) attacking US ports.
LMAO, so Ritter is the new spokesman of the left?As Scott Ritter says in that interview, these developments are of such magnitude and given Trump's clearly promised opposition (diametrically opposed) to financing Ukraine and supporting NATO, it is incumbent on Trump to make a public statement, stressing to the world that his administration will be reversing such decisions and reducing the threat's on Russia, that Trump has no intention of allowing the US get dragged into a - potentially - nuclear war.
I must admit that I'm puzzled by Trump's silence so far, if he disagrees and disapproves of this ATACMS decision then publicly say that and say you'll reverse the decision and cease support for Ukraine and he should also call the Kremlin too.
Russia had attacked Ukraine - not the other way around.
Since Russia has relentlessly been firing missiles into Ukraine - what is supposedly wrong with Ukraine doing the same?
Your comment is as absurd as for one condemning the USA to provide military assistance to South-Korea in 1951 so as for South-Korea to be able to bomb and bring the war into North-Korea. The only thing presently missing are UN aka US and NATO troops going into action against Russia. Something NATO refused to do latest in Feb. 2022 (since they had never prepared themselves for such an eventuality), despite having enforced/provoked Russia via their Eastward Expansion policy.
Since 1991- the founding and recognition of an independent and sovereign Ukraine, every US administration has been in favor of Ukraine and the NATO-Eastward expansion. Incl. Trump who supported Ukraine with military assistance and NEVER budged from the US political embrace of the Eastward Expansion doctrine. E.g. extending NATO membership to Montenegro in 2017 and North-Macedonia in 2020.
To assault that region.Why did Putin employ North Korean troops in Kursk?
Exactly. That is the Russian MO. For further evidence, see the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Why? He wants to leave Trump a nuclear war.
www.forbes.com
if Russia supplied Cuba with missiles and gave them the go ahead to Strike inside the US the US would view it as an act of war committed by both nations .. though I am no fan of Russia because they are the aggressor and had no right invading a sovereign country Bidens actions are very risky .. remember everyone ! Russia has 6 thousand nukes ! that's more than the rest of the world combined ! we need a leader in the US that can get both sides in the war together and work out an agreement to end it before it gets past the point of no return for the entire world .
6 misses launched. After putins warnings, where does this lead?
Why is biden escalating this close to a new administration?
no .. he was the 1st POTUS to send them Javelins to counter Russian tanks if they invaded again after the Russians took Crimea in 2014 .. Obama sent blankets and MREs..Is it possible that Trump will end ALL U.S. military and financial assistance to Ukraine?