Ukraine launches long range missles into russia

Hollie recall too that Trump promised to release secret JFK documents during his first term yet backed off, no doubt the truth might upset the Zionist masters back in Tel-Aviv and even Trump has to bow down to them.

View attachment 1044302
Oh my, you are an accomplice to misgendering CIA ''spokesman'' Nicole de Haay.

Our own link identifies that the CIA was raising national security concerns.
 
The phony anti-war 60's activists who fled to Canada to avoid the draft and were pardoned by the Peanut Man are now in charge in the Biden administration and guess what, "War what is it good for, absolutely nothing" is no longer their anthem. The escalation of a war to the point that American made missiles are flying into Russia ain't so bad as long as hypocrite democrats are still in power. Let Trump deal with it.
Someone who was 20 in 1960 is now 84 years old. Other than Nasty Pelosi and Brandon, who else is left?
 
Oh my, you are an accomplice to misgendering CIA ''spokesman'' Nicole de Haay.

Our own link identifies that the CIA was raising national security concerns.
Of course they did, what did you expect them to say, "Mossad assassinated JFK" or something?
 
Conquer and Divide

The lame duck's lame strategy is the textbook s one of making sheltered Russian civilians feel the pain, inciting them to overthrow Putin's regime. Then the Globalists can move in and chop up Russia into tiny principalities.
I see, in other words, Russia is making sheltered Ukrainian civilians feel the pain, inciting them to overthrow the present Ukrainian government, so that Russia can move in and chop up Ukraine into tiny principalities.
 
Where will it lead? Nowhere. Putin will give some lengthy press conference huffing and puffing about, "escalation" but not actually do anything, and Ukraine will probably continue its withdrawal westwards.
The very same mistake that was made by Ukrainians. Wishful thinking.
My bet, is that there will be some time (weeks or months) of a "phony war", few deniable attacks on US bases on US soil, some proxy attacks, and, eventually, if the mutually acceptable peace solution isn't found (I don't think it will be found), there will be direct Russian counter-force attack against US nuclear forces and then - ultimatum.
 
My bet, is that there will be some time (weeks or months) of a "phony war", few deniable attacks on US bases on US soil, some proxy attacks, and, eventually, if the mutually acceptable peace solution isn't found (I don't think it will be found), there will be direct Russian counter-force attack against US nuclear forces and then - ultimatum.
The Russians will never go after our nukes, and will never attack US soil.
 
Russia attacked Ukraine. That is how the world will see it, with the Ukis having every right to smear Russia's face in it.
And America attacked Vietnam (at least it was the "worlds opinion"). But there is the difference between Russian missiles shooting down US planes in Vietnam sky and the Russian missiles attacking US bases on US soil. As well as there is the difference between Iranian missiles attacking US ships in the Red sea, and Russian missiles (launched from some HAMAS barges) attacking US ports.
 
For you to be correct, the Russians have to be insane, and want an actual, real, hot war with the US - they have no rational motive for this as they have nothing to gain and everything to lose.
The Russian mainland is now being attacked by NATO, this is the reality, Russia is already at war with NATO the fact that the Western media refuse to state this obvious fact shouldn't mislead people.
 
1732133048574.webp
 
15th post
I doubt it. Putting didn't make any moves while trump was in office. Putin probably sees his war coming to an end soon.

Biden over here pushing his buttons.

Remember, putin is putting Ukraine and the US in the same basket, since we provided the missles, gave the green light on their use and are probably providing support for their use.
Putin on a suicide mission, is he. I hope he takes another attitude in favor of Peace On Earth.
Well Trump could openly state that they will reverse these decisions and cease all support for Ukraine that could, might, stave off a harsh reaction from Russia, if Trump remains silent on this then Russia will naturally have no reason to trust Trump.

Trump's talked the talk for years about this and NATO, well nothing stops him from holding a press conference today and making his position crystal clear and saying "**** you" to Biden, if Trump actually does this, the right thing, I'll go so far as to say I have some respect for him and that is not something I say lightly.

So to all the MAGATS here, why has Trump not held a press conference? not stated his disapproval of the ATACMS decisions and not made it clear to the world that his administration will be reversing the US position starting Jan 20 ? why...why...the silence from Trump...why is he pissing around with silliness like Gaetz and RFK?

Instead we get more reports of more appointments like today's mention of Howard Lutnick, and an impending visit to SpaceX to watch a ******* rocket launch, I mean is Trump so stupid he can't see how important it is to take a public and stern stance on this immediately?
Don't sell Trump's gift from the art of the deal.
 
For you to be correct, the Russians have to be insane, and want an actual, real, hot war with the US - they have no rational motive for this as they have nothing to gain and everything to lose.
As America actually attacked Russia, Russians do ask the same question about American motives and possible further actions. "Why America started an actual, real, hot war with Russia by attacking Russian bases on undisputed Russian soil?"

From their point of view nobody start a war just as a political jesture, or to make next administration to be defeated. And they can't rule out the possibility that American goal is [however impossible it looks like] actually defeat Russia (whatever price Americans will pay for it).
So, they have a choice between:
1) no answer and allow USA attack whatever they want in Russia; this strategy will definitely means eventual defeat of Russia.

2) "uncontrolled escalation" with the risk that Americans will nuke them first; which possible means unnecessary deaths of millions of Russians.

3) well calculated preempive counter-force strike which will significantly decrease US nuclear forces (and possibly will give Russia opportunity to coerce the USA in Russia-acceptable peace with limited retaliation or without US retaliation at all).

The third opportunity looks like the safest for them. "If the fight is inevitable - you should attack first".
 
Back
Top Bottom