UC Berkeley: Queering Agriculture talk being given

This talk highlights vital ways queering and trans-ing ideas and practices of agriculture are necessary for more sustainable, sovereign, and equitable food systems for the creatures and systems involved in systemic reproductions that feed humans and other creatures.

:eusa_eh:
 
Yea, what is this? LOL

Asexuality as a Human Sexual Orientation Serendip Studio

Only in the past few years has the public in general accepted homosexuality and bisexuality as genuine sexual orientations (although debates over cause, morality, and status in society continue), but now another orientation is being proposed: asexuality. What is it, and is it really a sexual orientation, determined before birth like heterosexuality or homosexuality are now theorized to be? Traditionally, "asexual" referred to the reproduction of simplistic organisms (amoebas, primitive worms, fungi, etc.) or in humans to a lack of sexual organs or an inability to feel/act sexually due to disability or other condition. However, the new proposed definition for "asexual" presents it as a (human) sexual orientation, following that if heterosexuality is attraction to the opposite sex, homosexuality is attraction to the same sex, bisexuality is attraction to both, asexuality is attraction to neither sex.
 
Yea, what is this? LOL

Asexuality as a Human Sexual Orientation Serendip Studio

Only in the past few years has the public in general accepted homosexuality and bisexuality as genuine sexual orientations (although debates over cause, morality, and status in society continue), but now another orientation is being proposed: asexuality. What is it, and is it really a sexual orientation, determined before birth like heterosexuality or homosexuality are now theorized to be? Traditionally, "asexual" referred to the reproduction of simplistic organisms (amoebas, primitive worms, fungi, etc.) or in humans to a lack of sexual organs or an inability to feel/act sexually due to disability or other condition. However, the new proposed definition for "asexual" presents it as a (human) sexual orientation, following that if heterosexuality is attraction to the opposite sex, homosexuality is attraction to the same sex, bisexuality is attraction to both, asexuality is attraction to neither sex.
It's very simple. There are people who are not sexually attracted to men or women. They don't need any particular rights separate and apart from anyone else. They don't require marriage licenses or inheritance rights.
 
This talk highlights the normative ways that popular culture, food activism, and government regulations have framed sustainable food systems in the United States. By focusing on popular culture representations and government legislation since 9/11, it will become clearer how the growing popularity of sustainable food is laden with anthroheterocentric assumptions of the “good life” coupled with idealized images and ideas of the American farm, and gender, radicalized and normative standards of health, family, and nation.

What they're saying is that anything that was normal is evil and wrong and we must educate people to understand that a guy sucking another man's asshole is just as healthy as eating an apple.
 
This talk highlights the normative ways that popular culture, food activism, and government regulations have framed sustainable food systems in the United States. By focusing on popular culture representations and government legislation since 9/11, it will become clearer how the growing popularity of sustainable food is laden with anthroheterocentric assumptions of the “good life” coupled with idealized images and ideas of the American farm, and gender, radicalized and normative standards of health, family, and nation.

What they're saying is that anything that was normal is evil and wrong and we must educate people to understand that a guy sucking another man's asshole is just as healthy as eating an apple.
 
Yea, what is this? LOL

Asexuality as a Human Sexual Orientation Serendip Studio

Only in the past few years has the public in general accepted homosexuality and bisexuality as genuine sexual orientations (although debates over cause, morality, and status in society continue), but now another orientation is being proposed: asexuality. What is it, and is it really a sexual orientation, determined before birth like heterosexuality or homosexuality are now theorized to be? Traditionally, "asexual" referred to the reproduction of simplistic organisms (amoebas, primitive worms, fungi, etc.) or in humans to a lack of sexual organs or an inability to feel/act sexually due to disability or other condition. However, the new proposed definition for "asexual" presents it as a (human) sexual orientation, following that if heterosexuality is attraction to the opposite sex, homosexuality is attraction to the same sex, bisexuality is attraction to both, asexuality is attraction to neither sex.
It's very simple. There are people who are not sexually attracted to men or women. They don't need any particular rights separate and apart from anyone else. They don't require marriage licenses or inheritance rights.

That makes them asexual though?
 
This talk highlights the normative ways that popular culture, food activism, and government regulations have framed sustainable food systems in the United States. By focusing on popular culture representations and government legislation since 9/11, it will become clearer how the growing popularity of sustainable food is laden with anthroheterocentric assumptions of the “good life” coupled with idealized images and ideas of the American farm, and gender, radicalized and normative standards of health, family, and nation.

What they're saying is that anything that was normal is evil and wrong and we must educate people to understand that a guy sucking another man's asshole is just as healthy as eating an apple.

^ 1st sensible post in this thread
 
:lmao:

They are comparing humans to food crops saying that "transgenderism" is merely some type of new thing we should accept like GMO crops!

The only problem with that is that a man who has hacked his junk off, put on nylons, clown makeup and high heels can never bear a child from a womb he doesn't have.

And no matter how much facial hair a woman grows and how she tries to have a fake whanger sewn on, she will never impregnate another woman.

The lengths this cult is stretching "logic" to force everyone to see them as "normal" has just reached its full extension and has snapped. This article is the sound of snapping..
 
Any liberal going to bother to translate this liberal mental illness based nonsense into english?
 

Forum List

Back
Top