U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Hear Transgender School-Bathroom Case

Most people period are against a man with a penis using facilities for women. You have been indoctrinated.

What are your feelings about a man in a dress using the men’s room?
Don't care and actually don't care here. Men can take care of themselves. Some lady wants to see my junk. No worries. But the other way where men identify as women and use their locker rooms. Therein lies a whole different issue of they are allowed to play physical sports against biological girls. Common sense should prevail. But your posts on this board reveal that you have little if any.
Frankly, I don’t care where they pee and think they should be excluded from women’s sports
I don't want a man with his junk changing in the same locker room as my young daughters. You don't care about women's rights. I get it.
Do you want a man in a dress changing next to your young son?
Could not care less. Don't want a man in a dress changing next to my young daughters. Men are animals. We can take care of ourselves and laugh it off.
 
Because the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, the lower court ruling stands.

Schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

Only 2 on the court wanted to take the case.

So that means that 4 conservatives agreed that schools can't discriminate against transgender students.



But you're fine with everyone else being discriminated against.
 
Last edited:
Here's a solution....

How about trans folks use the bathroom where they were using it before conservatives needed another manufactured culture war battle to fight??

Or do these folks think trans folks just started using the bathroom a couple of years ago?
 
Because the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, the lower court ruling stands.

Schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

Only 2 on the court wanted to take the case.

So that means that 4 conservatives agreed that schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

This is complete liberal insanity



You need to pay attention to current events in our nation.

The Supreme Court is very far from liberal.

There are SIX conservatives and THREE liberals on that court.

You do the math. That is if you can.

Stop lying.
 
Because the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, the lower court ruling stands.

Schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

Only 2 on the court wanted to take the case.

So that means that 4 conservatives agreed that schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

So they are refusing their names against the flight of trans people. I see they don't want their name attached to whatever they decide.

They also didn't decide the ACA case, they didn't want their names associated with it.

They will pass on anything they have to sign their john henry to, that is the republican game. Its too hard!!
 
Because the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, the lower court ruling stands.

Schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

Only 2 on the court wanted to take the case.

So that means that 4 conservatives agreed that schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

Another loss for women's rights. Don't care if a woman wants to identify as a man and see men's junk or compete vs. men in sports. The other way around is an entirely different situation and utterly unfair.

It's a girl who decided it was a boy.
Wants to use the boy's restroom.
If that person gets what they want, that only makes me wonder how the boys at that school will feel about having to share their spaces with such an inconsiderate person. Usually its a guy wanting to be where the girls are that makes the news. This time its a girl wanting to be where the boys are. I can't help but wonder how the girl's parents will feel, especially if the girl is only eventually taken advantage of by a guy in there who doesn't care one way or another what her intentions happen to be.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
 
Because the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, the lower court ruling stands.

Schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

Only 2 on the court wanted to take the case.

So that means that 4 conservatives agreed that schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

So they are refusing their names against the flight of trans people. I see they don't want their name attached to whatever they decide.


Wut?
 
Because the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, the lower court ruling stands.

Schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

Only 2 on the court wanted to take the case.

So that means that 4 conservatives agreed that schools can't discriminate against transgender students.


We have decided that Body Dysmorphia surrounding someone's sexuality is not only to be accepted, but accommodated and celebrated.

Well, that discriminates against Body Dysmorphia in eating disorders. So maybe high school students with a sad case of bulimia nervosa need to get their lunches and a trash can and proceed with binging and purging right there in the cafeteria.

Body Dysmorphia. They think they're fat. They can't help it. It's the belief in their head.

Oh, they're mutilating their body because of it? Huh....

At any rate the school district cannot discriminate against people with Body Dysmorphia. Is this not what we have decided? Or does this only pertain to sexual identity?

PS I do not hate transgenders. I really, honestly do not. But if we are made to accommodate things that clearly make many people uncomfortable, I don't know why we don't accommodate bulimia too. anyone?
 
Because the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, the lower court ruling stands.

Schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

Only 2 on the court wanted to take the case.

So that means that 4 conservatives agreed that schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

So they are refusing their names against the flight of trans people. I see they don't want their name attached to whatever they decide.


Wut?
I expanded it:

So they are refusing their names against the flight of trans people. I see they don't want their name attached to whatever they decide.

They also didn't decide the ACA case, they didn't want their names associated with it.

They will pass on anything they have to sign their john henry to, that is the republican game. Its too hard!!
 
Because the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, the lower court ruling stands.

Schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

Only 2 on the court wanted to take the case.

So that means that 4 conservatives agreed that schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

So they are refusing their names against the flight of trans people. I see they don't want their name attached to whatever they decide.

They also didn't decide the ACA case, they didn't want their names associated with it.

They will pass on anything they have to sign their john henry to, that is the republican game. Its too hard!!

John Hancock is your signature. John Henry was a man from folklore who was a steel driver
 
Because the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, the lower court ruling stands.
I thought that according to JackOfNoTrades that when a court declined to take your case that proved a lack of evidence! :thanks: So in Trump's case, the "lower court" is the opinions of the people.

Schools can't discriminate against transgender students.
Just all the regular normal kids, right?

Only 2 on the court wanted to take the case.
That claim was debunked and found baseless last November.
 

And, a major win for transgenders.

Perhaps questions should be directed to Trump about whether or not he fully vetted his SCOTUS nominees. They sure ain't playing ball! Bigly


Peek inside a lefties skull and all you'll see is-

trumptrump
trump
trumptrumpderp
derptrumptrumptrump
crycrytrump
trumpsniffletrumptrump
trump
meanypantstrumptrumpandtrump
 
Here's a solution....

How about trans folks use the bathroom where they were using it before conservatives needed another manufactured culture war battle to fight??

Or do these folks think trans folks just started using the bathroom a couple of years ago?
Well, in the 80s when I was in high school, it was unheard of kids coming out as trans while minors in school. So this would be before the "manufactured culture war". Girls used the girls restroom, boys used the boys restroom. If a kid known to be a boy decided to just start using the girls restroom, there would be hell to pay. Same for a girl that decides to use the boys restroom.
 
Because the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, the lower court ruling stands.

Schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

Only 2 on the court wanted to take the case.

So that means that 4 conservatives agreed that schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

So they are refusing their names against the flight of trans people. I see they don't want their name attached to whatever they decide.


Wut?
I expanded it:

So they are refusing their names against the flight of trans people. I see they don't want their name attached to whatever they decide.

They also didn't decide the ACA case, they didn't want their names associated with it.

They will pass on anything they have to sign their john henry to, that is the republican game. Its too hard!!


Very true.

They let the appeals court put their name on it.
 
Here's a solution....

How about trans folks use the bathroom where they were using it before conservatives needed another manufactured culture war battle to fight??

Or do these folks think trans folks just started using the bathroom a couple of years ago?
Well, in the 80s when I was in high school, it was unheard of kids coming out as trans while minors in school. So this would be before the "manufactured culture war". Girls used the girls restroom, boys used the boys restroom. If a kid known to be a boy decided to just start using the girls restroom, there would be hell to pay. Same for a girl that decides to use the boys restroom.
If you go back far enough....there was hell to pay if a kid was gay period.....

Fast forward to today....and all of the fearmongering over trans and bathrooms remain just that...fear mongering.....


Trying to sexually assault children in restrooms is still as illegal now as it was 40 years ago....
 
Because the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, the lower court ruling stands.

Schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

Only 2 on the court wanted to take the case.

So that means that 4 conservatives agreed that schools can't discriminate against transgender students.



But you're fine with everyone else being discriminated against.
Poor ewe.
 
Because the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, the lower court ruling stands.

Schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

Only 2 on the court wanted to take the case.

So that means that 4 conservatives agreed that schools can't discriminate against transgender students.

So they are refusing their names against the flight of trans people. I see they don't want their name attached to whatever they decide.

They also didn't decide the ACA case, they didn't want their names associated with it.

They will pass on anything they have to sign their john henry to, that is the republican game. Its too hard!!

John Hancock is your signature. John Henry was a man from folklore who was a steel driver
They are Democrats they are ignorant to history. I am surprised she didn't write Herbie Hancock. :)
 

Forum List

Back
Top