What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

U.S. Army Ranger charged in beating death of female Tacoma security guard

HereWeGoAgain

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
73,488
Reaction score
22,831
Points
2,280
Location
Fuck Y'all I'm From Texas!
You're 200 lbs. and 'can fight'. Big fucking whoop. Doesn't mean anything. You'd still be just as dead in that situation. Save your false bravado. Your point sucks out loud.

I could beat the shit out of 99% of the women out there.
You cant say that about your average woman when it comes to her fighting a man.
Men are just stronger and thats a fact.
 

HereWeGoAgain

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
73,488
Reaction score
22,831
Points
2,280
Location
Fuck Y'all I'm From Texas!

It's pretty obvious. They dont have the strength of a man and are at a disadvantage when faced with a male attacker which puts the rest of her squad mates in danger.
It's no different than putting a WNBA team against an NBA team. The men are stronger and faster.
Hell, a Mens collage team would easily beat any team in the WNBA.
 

HereWeGoAgain

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
73,488
Reaction score
22,831
Points
2,280
Location
Fuck Y'all I'm From Texas!
Idiot.

Men are murdered in the same way. It is very easy to kill. The social contract is that we must determine if your death is justified or not. If it is not we owe it to everyone to hold the murderer accountable.

Degrading it to an asinine proof of your sexist theories diminishes the crime and demonstrates your lack of integrity.

Who would be easier to kill in hand to hand combat?
 

SavannahMann

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2016
Messages
7,614
Reaction score
2,638
Points
325
Who would be easier to kill in hand to hand combat?

It depends on who is more trained and experienced. Or is all that training wasted in your world?
 

Mac-7

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
31,785
Reaction score
21,989
Points
2,865
Never understood why Rangers, Green Berets, Seals, etc. were always portrayed as great people. Being specially trained to kill is a useful skill in war, but it doesn't go very far in making you a good person.
We want a military that is good at killing
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
76,362
Reaction score
16,787
Points
2,180
We want a military that is good at killing
Yes, and their training makes them good soldiers. It doesn't make them good representatives, or good at developing policies that help instead of harm his constituants, or determining what his constituants need, or even being a decent human being.
 

whitehall

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
51,344
Reaction score
14,685
Points
2,190
Location
Western Va.
Tim McVeigh was a Veteran who was awarded the Bronze Star but it only took the Feds about 7 years from the date of the crime to execute him.
 
OP
NewsVine_Mariyam

NewsVine_Mariyam

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2018
Messages
6,081
Reaction score
3,151
Points
1,030
Location
The Beautiful Pacific Northwest
Judges who let savages run loose should face Sharia law!

Off topic, start your own thread if that's what you want to discuss. You are not welcome on any of my threads.
 
OP
NewsVine_Mariyam

NewsVine_Mariyam

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2018
Messages
6,081
Reaction score
3,151
Points
1,030
Location
The Beautiful Pacific Northwest
Why? Was there something to indicate he knew her when he came into and the female guard ordered out of the court building in the middle of the night?
No, I was just speculating as to why he's being charged with two counts of everything, but I haven't seen anything to indicate that he is actually being charged that way.
 

SavannahMann

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2016
Messages
7,614
Reaction score
2,638
Points
325
Training does't matter in most cases since there are very few people who are trained in hand to hand combat.
If both parties are trained the man will beat the women every time.


Good to know.


I mean. How many thugs take the time to learn a self defense technique?

But let’s stick to this case. The assailant was an Army Ranger. Trained in hand to hand. Your average rent a cop has no chance against him. A man could have. A man would have been beaten to death exactly the same way.

If the roles had been reversed. A trained female, especially a veteran, against an untrained male, she would have won.

So my point stands.
 
OP
NewsVine_Mariyam

NewsVine_Mariyam

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2018
Messages
6,081
Reaction score
3,151
Points
1,030
Location
The Beautiful Pacific Northwest
I could beat the shit out of 99% of the women out there.
You cant say that about your average woman when it comes to her fighting a man.
Men are just stronger and thats a fact.
That's why the courts allow women to use deadly force against a man even if he isn't armed because of the disparity of force. It is automatically assumed that she will be at a disadvantage when dealing with a male assailant who by virtue of biology is normally larger and stronger than her.
 

Dont Taz Me Bro

Diamond Member
Staff member
Senior USMB Moderator
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
55,986
Reaction score
21,418
Points
2,290
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
It doesn't?
Than why couldnt she defend herself?
With the training he had he just as easily could have killed most men. Most people are not trained nor are their brains wired to fight. They panic and don't know what to do when confronted.
 

OKTexas

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
55,009
Reaction score
13,129
Points
2,220
Location
Near Magnolia, TX
Tim McVeigh was a Veteran who was awarded the Bronze Star but it only took the Feds about 7 years from the date of the crime to execute him.


Only because he didn't appeal the conviction or sentence. He could have drug it out years more.

.
 

OKTexas

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
55,009
Reaction score
13,129
Points
2,220
Location
Near Magnolia, TX
With the training he had he just as easily could have killed most men. Most people are not trained nor are their brains wired to fight. They panic and don't know what to do when confronted.


It's pretty simple, an attacker has to breathe and see, so you go for the throat and eyes. A sharp blow to the throat can hinder breathing and you go for the eyes like you're putting your fingers in a bowling ball, you push them in as deep as possible. Just those two things can give even a woman a chance to escape a man. Those are techniques I've taught my wife.

.
 

Mac-7

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
31,785
Reaction score
21,989
Points
2,865
Yes, and their training makes them good soldiers. It doesn't make them good representatives, or good at developing policies that help instead of harm his constituants, or determining what his constituants need, or even being a decent human being.
I think you are describing elected leaders and saying that ex military should be disqualified from serving in government

naturally I disagree
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
76,362
Reaction score
16,787
Points
2,180
I think you are describing elected leaders and saying that ex military should be disqualified from serving in government

naturally I disagree
I'm not saying they should be disqualified, butI don't see where it should be much of an advantage. How often is killing someone a skill needed in Congress?
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$142.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top