Playing two minutes of football means an hour of commercials after the two minute warning is given. In football, the team with the most points runs out the clock. In Clintonâs e-mail server game the losing team wants to prolong the game hoping to score a winning touchdown with a hail Mary pass:
An independent counsel is exactly what Hillaryâs team wants. Appointing an IC, and finally getting his recommendation, will prolong the game until next spring. In the event Hillary wins the general election she can pardon herself and everybody else on her team.
NOTE: The liar endorsing another liar has no reason to delay the game with an independent counsel. He is playing in a different ball park. In my opinion the liarâs real choice, Joe Biden, is suited up and ready to go in for Hillary Clinton. See this thread:
To indict or not indict
Speculation about the FBIâs investigation has been sliced and diced for months; however, a few mouth-watering prospects popped up in the punishment phase:
âOur system has a way for Congress and the public to deal with these problems: impeachment and the ballot box. Under Article I, Section 3, the punishment for impeachment includes âdisqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United Statesâ â so it theoretically applies even to former government officials for purposes of disqualifying them,â
This one is especially tantalizing:
I do not know how constitutional implications will play out. I do know that Taqiyya the Liar would not throw Clinton overboard without a life jacket unless he is already wearing one:
WASHINGTON â Conservative legal experts are sharply divided over whether it is time to demand an independent counsel to investigate Hillary Clintonâs email scandal, now that President Obama has officially endorsed her for president.
McCarthy made the case that an independent counsel would be both impractical and unconstitutional, and cited no less a legal authority than the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, for reasons outlined below.
XXXXX
McCarthy made the case that an independent counsel would be both impractical and unconstitutional, and cited no less a legal authority than the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, for reasons outlined below.
An independent counsel is exactly what Hillaryâs team wants. Appointing an IC, and finally getting his recommendation, will prolong the game until next spring. In the event Hillary wins the general election she can pardon herself and everybody else on her team.
NOTE: The liar endorsing another liar has no reason to delay the game with an independent counsel. He is playing in a different ball park. In my opinion the liarâs real choice, Joe Biden, is suited up and ready to go in for Hillary Clinton. See this thread:
The Liar In Chief wants Bernie out of the way so Biden can ride in on a white horse after Hillary is indicted.
Bernie Better Get It In Writing
Bernie Better Get It In Writing
To indict or not indict
Speculation about the FBIâs investigation has been sliced and diced for months; however, a few mouth-watering prospects popped up in the punishment phase:
âOur system has a way for Congress and the public to deal with these problems: impeachment and the ballot box. Under Article I, Section 3, the punishment for impeachment includes âdisqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United Statesâ â so it theoretically applies even to former government officials for purposes of disqualifying them,â
This one is especially tantalizing:
In an email to supporters on Thursday, Obama declared, âI canât wait to get out there and campaign for her.â At the same time, White House press secretary Josh Earnest insisted that the presidentâs endorsement will not âswayâ the FBI, which, the spokesman acknowledged, was conducting a âcriminalâ investigation.
And, as for what Judge Napolitano was hearing from his sources, McCarthy said he didnât know whether Obamaâs emails were among the top classified communications.
But, the former prosecutor then alluded to a potentially much more explosive issue.
McCarthy implied the reason Clinton hasnât been charged yet may be because the president might be guilty, too.
That was because, as heâd previously noted, âObama knowingly communicated with Clinton over a non-government, non-secure e-mail system.â
In his email to WND, McCarthy referred to an article he had written back in February in which he had observed, âEighteen e-mails between Mrs. Clinton and President Obama have been identified, and the government is refusing to disclose themâ and that they likely were ânot about her recommendations for the best country clubs in Marthaâs Vineyard, but about matters that the White House judges too sensitive to reveal.â
â[D]o you think those exchanges just might touch on foreign-government information, foreign relations, or foreign activities of the United States â deliberations on which are presumed classified?â he asked rhetorically, in the article.
He added the clincher, that the administration was fighting the release of those emails because they âmight expose that Obama engaged in recklessness similar to Clintonâs, albeit on a far smaller scale.â
XXXXX
And, as for what Judge Napolitano was hearing from his sources, McCarthy said he didnât know whether Obamaâs emails were among the top classified communications.
But, the former prosecutor then alluded to a potentially much more explosive issue.
McCarthy implied the reason Clinton hasnât been charged yet may be because the president might be guilty, too.
That was because, as heâd previously noted, âObama knowingly communicated with Clinton over a non-government, non-secure e-mail system.â
In his email to WND, McCarthy referred to an article he had written back in February in which he had observed, âEighteen e-mails between Mrs. Clinton and President Obama have been identified, and the government is refusing to disclose themâ and that they likely were ânot about her recommendations for the best country clubs in Marthaâs Vineyard, but about matters that the White House judges too sensitive to reveal.â
â[D]o you think those exchanges just might touch on foreign-government information, foreign relations, or foreign activities of the United States â deliberations on which are presumed classified?â he asked rhetorically, in the article.
He added the clincher, that the administration was fighting the release of those emails because they âmight expose that Obama engaged in recklessness similar to Clintonâs, albeit on a far smaller scale.â
What happens to FBI's Hillary probe after Obama nod?
Posted By Garth Kant On 06/09/2016 @ 8:38 pm
What happens to FBIâs Hillary probe after Obama nod?
Posted By Garth Kant On 06/09/2016 @ 8:38 pm
What happens to FBIâs Hillary probe after Obama nod?
I do not know how constitutional implications will play out. I do know that Taqiyya the Liar would not throw Clinton overboard without a life jacket unless he is already wearing one:
