So, Hillary Clinton Was Cheated

skews13

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2017
9,556
12,027
2,415
The core allegation is that this is a felony because Donald Trump lied to cover up a kind of election fraud. He sought to keep his dirty laundry out of public because it threatened to torpedo his presidential campaign. But “election interference” is very hard to sell because Donald Trump himself has been whining about “election interference” for years. And the federal DC case is also about election interference (although of a much more direct and violent sort).

The fraudulent business records covered up “hush money payments” to “porn stars”. So, many in the media call this trial the “hush money payments” trial or just the “hush money” trial, even though paying someone to keep quiet is (bizarrely) legal.

All of these attempts miss the point. It’s not like the MSM is trying to bury the lede (ha, ha), but the entire portent of this trial is what a conviction tells us:

Very, very likely if the public knew about the payments, Hillary Clinton would have won the 2016 presidential election.

That is, this trial almost certainly will prove that Hillary Clinton was (almost certainly) cheated.



Be glad election interference isn't another felony on the list for you today donny.
 
382288432-1997_conspiracy_theory_1.jpg
 
The core allegation is that this is a felony because Donald Trump lied to cover up a kind of election fraud. He sought to keep his dirty laundry out of public because it threatened to torpedo his presidential campaign. But “election interference” is very hard to sell because Donald Trump himself has been whining about “election interference” for years. And the federal DC case is also about election interference (although of a much more direct and violent sort).

The fraudulent business records covered up “hush money payments” to “porn stars”. So, many in the media call this trial the “hush money payments” trial or just the “hush money” trial, even though paying someone to keep quiet is (bizarrely) legal.

All of these attempts miss the point. It’s not like the MSM is trying to bury the lede (ha, ha), but the entire portent of this trial is what a conviction tells us:

Very, very likely if the public knew about the payments, Hillary Clinton would have won the 2016 presidential election.

That is, this trial almost certainly will prove that Hillary Clinton was (almost certainly) cheated.



Be glad election interference isn't another felony on the list for you today donny.
/---/ So Bob Dole was cheated out of the 1996 election because Clinton paid Paula Jones $850k in hush money.
 
The core allegation is that this is a felony because Donald Trump lied to cover up a kind of election fraud. He sought to keep his dirty laundry out of public because it threatened to torpedo his presidential campaign. But “election interference” is very hard to sell because Donald Trump himself has been whining about “election interference” for years. And the federal DC case is also about election interference (although of a much more direct and violent sort).

The fraudulent business records covered up “hush money payments” to “porn stars”. So, many in the media call this trial the “hush money payments” trial or just the “hush money” trial, even though paying someone to keep quiet is (bizarrely) legal.

All of these attempts miss the point. It’s not like the MSM is trying to bury the lede (ha, ha), but the entire portent of this trial is what a conviction tells us:

Very, very likely if the public knew about the payments, Hillary Clinton would have won the 2016 presidential election.

That is, this trial almost certainly will prove that Hillary Clinton was (almost certainly) cheated.



Be glad election interference isn't another felony on the list for you today donny.
 
The core allegation is that this is a felony because Donald Trump lied to cover up a kind of election fraud. He sought to keep his dirty laundry out of public because it threatened to torpedo his presidential campaign. But “election interference” is very hard to sell because Donald Trump himself has been whining about “election interference” for years. And the federal DC case is also about election interference (although of a much more direct and violent sort).

The fraudulent business records covered up “hush money payments” to “porn stars”. So, many in the media call this trial the “hush money payments” trial or just the “hush money” trial, even though paying someone to keep quiet is (bizarrely) legal.

All of these attempts miss the point. It’s not like the MSM is trying to bury the lede (ha, ha), but the entire portent of this trial is what a conviction tells us:

Very, very likely if the public knew about the payments, Hillary Clinton would have won the 2016 presidential election.

That is, this trial almost certainly will prove that Hillary Clinton was (almost certainly) cheated.



Be glad election interference isn't another felony on the list for you today donny.
Of course she was cheated, she was married to Horn Dog Clinton.
Where will you move skrewey? You get more and more desperate each day.
 
The core allegation is that this is a felony because Donald Trump lied to cover up a kind of election fraud. He sought to keep his dirty laundry out of public because it threatened to torpedo his presidential campaign. But “election interference” is very hard to sell because Donald Trump himself has been whining about “election interference” for years. And the federal DC case is also about election interference (although of a much more direct and violent sort).

The fraudulent business records covered up “hush money payments” to “porn stars”. So, many in the media call this trial the “hush money payments” trial or just the “hush money” trial, even though paying someone to keep quiet is (bizarrely) legal.

All of these attempts miss the point. It’s not like the MSM is trying to bury the lede (ha, ha), but the entire portent of this trial is what a conviction tells us:

Very, very likely if the public knew about the payments, Hillary Clinton would have won the 2016 presidential election.

That is, this trial almost certainly will prove that Hillary Clinton was (almost certainly) cheated.



Be glad election interference isn't another felony on the list for you today donny.
The only campaign and person found to have violated federal election laws in the 2016 election was clinton and the dnc
 
The core allegation is that this is a felony because Donald Trump lied to cover up a kind of election fraud. He sought to keep his dirty laundry out of public because it threatened to torpedo his presidential campaign. But “election interference” is very hard to sell because Donald Trump himself has been whining about “election interference” for years. And the federal DC case is also about election interference (although of a much more direct and violent sort).

The fraudulent business records covered up “hush money payments” to “porn stars”. So, many in the media call this trial the “hush money payments” trial or just the “hush money” trial, even though paying someone to keep quiet is (bizarrely) legal.

All of these attempts miss the point. It’s not like the MSM is trying to bury the lede (ha, ha), but the entire portent of this trial is what a conviction tells us:

Very, very likely if the public knew about the payments, Hillary Clinton would have won the 2016 presidential election.

That is, this trial almost certainly will prove that Hillary Clinton was (almost certainly) cheated.



Be glad election interference isn't another felony on the list for you today donny.
Grumblenuts
 
The core allegation is that this is a felony because Donald Trump lied to cover up a kind of election fraud. He sought to keep his dirty laundry out of public because it threatened to torpedo his presidential campaign. But “election interference” is very hard to sell because Donald Trump himself has been whining about “election interference” for years. And the federal DC case is also about election interference (although of a much more direct and violent sort).

The fraudulent business records covered up “hush money payments” to “porn stars”. So, many in the media call this trial the “hush money payments” trial or just the “hush money” trial, even though paying someone to keep quiet is (bizarrely) legal.

All of these attempts miss the point. It’s not like the MSM is trying to bury the lede (ha, ha), but the entire portent of this trial is what a conviction tells us:

Very, very likely if the public knew about the payments, Hillary Clinton would have won the 2016 presidential election.

That is, this trial almost certainly will prove that Hillary Clinton was (almost certainly) cheated.



Be glad election interference isn't another felony on the list for you today donny.
Did you just claim that Hillary Clinton was the "victim" of election fraud, Skews? I hate to point out the obvious here but Hillary ran one of the dirtiest campaigns in the history of this country! She and the DNC PAID to have phony "dossiers" leaked to the public right before the election to smear her opponent! She conspired with DNC leaders to block Bernie Sanders campaign! She even conspired with the main stream media to get debate questions in advance. Her husband...Slick Willie...had a secret meeting with Attorney General Lynch on the tarmac in Arizona to make sure she wasn't charged with obstruction of justice!

Anyone claiming Hillary was "cheated" is laughably myopic!
 
Poor skrewey.
So many disappointments. Maybe someday you will, like the little kids sing in church, build your house upon the solid ground instead of the sand.
Your wacko ilk is going down....where will you move?

Did you just hear the fear in his voice when he showed up at the courthouse?

And just think. This is only the first trial.
 
The core allegation is that this is a felony because Donald Trump lied to cover up a kind of election fraud. He sought to keep his dirty laundry out of public because it threatened to torpedo his presidential campaign. But “election interference” is very hard to sell because Donald Trump himself has been whining about “election interference” for years. And the federal DC case is also about election interference (although of a much more direct and violent sort).

The fraudulent business records covered up “hush money payments” to “porn stars”. So, many in the media call this trial the “hush money payments” trial or just the “hush money” trial, even though paying someone to keep quiet is (bizarrely) legal.

All of these attempts miss the point. It’s not like the MSM is trying to bury the lede (ha, ha), but the entire portent of this trial is what a conviction tells us:

Very, very likely if the public knew about the payments, Hillary Clinton would have won the 2016 presidential election.

That is, this trial almost certainly will prove that Hillary Clinton was (almost certainly) cheated.



Be glad election interference isn't another felony on the list for you today donny.
HEIL BIDEN!
 

Forum List

Back
Top