The only thing interesting in media’s presidential election cacophony —— signifying nothing —— continues to be Hillary Clinton’s crimes. Judge Napolitano compares it to Nixon and Watergate:
The only way that exposing the Democrat party’s hatred of this country could have been more devastating would have been unmasking Obama & Company while she was secretary of state. I will never know why it came at the end of two terms and numerous lies put out by the Chicago sewer rat’s hatchet men and hatchet women. Had a conservative Republican been spotted jaywalking television would have ran the story 24-7 until he or she was run out of town on a rail.
http://www.lucianne.com/images/lucianne/DailyPhoto/2016-04-26.png
Here are a few observations I spliced together from previous threads:
Knowing where the bodies are buried makes Hillary Clinton bulletproof.
I cannot see Clinton walking away clean no matter how it plays out.
1. She loses if she is charged and tried whether or not she is convicted.
2. She loses if she is not charged and tried because a vast majority of American voters will believe the fix was in. In Short: Another big shot skating will destroy Clinton as much as a trial.
3. Clinton loses a third way if Trey Gowdy’s Select Committee identifies who gave the stand down order. Whether or not she gave the order —— she knows who did. As secretary of state she was responsible for the deaths of Americans who were abandoned while there was still time to save their lives. She had a chance to say she insisted on sending help. She did not say that. Instead, she evaded the issue when she finally testified. Even if she now claims she tried to send help but was overruled by the commander in chief she is complicit in the murders after the fact.
The first question any competent investigator would ask himself is this: Who benefits the most by deleting the top secret marking from a document? Of course, I am only speculating, but in this case my answer leads to Huma Abedin. What better way to get information to Ikhwan than Clinton’s e-mails?
Nobody talks. Everybody walks. —— just might fall by the wayside when the dominoes start falling. Everybody involved in espionage committed on Hillary’s private server must realize that the Clintons are looking for fall guys (plural). Those insiders surely must have known they were guilty of a crime while they were doing it. Bryan Pagliano’s immunity deal surely told everyone involved that the size of the rewards offered for talking begin to diminish until the FBI takes them off the table entirely.
Incidentally, when Hillary Clinton was co-president nobody could figure out why everybody in the administration remained so loyal. Clintonista loyalty was the ninth wonder of the world in an institution overrun with snakes. I always believed that it was loyalty to Bubba. Remember that Hillary never commanded the loyalty that attaches to every president regardless of how she saw herself.
Napolitano: Justice Dept. Shielding Hillary From Indictment Will Be ‘Catastrophic’ For Her
Steve Guest
Media Reporter
1:38 PM 04/25/2016
Napolitano: No Indictment Will Be 'Catastrophic' For Hillary [VIDEO]
Steve Guest
Media Reporter
1:38 PM 04/25/2016
Napolitano: No Indictment Will Be 'Catastrophic' For Hillary [VIDEO]
The only way that exposing the Democrat party’s hatred of this country could have been more devastating would have been unmasking Obama & Company while she was secretary of state. I will never know why it came at the end of two terms and numerous lies put out by the Chicago sewer rat’s hatchet men and hatchet women. Had a conservative Republican been spotted jaywalking television would have ran the story 24-7 until he or she was run out of town on a rail.
Here are a few observations I spliced together from previous threads:
Knowing where the bodies are buried makes Hillary Clinton bulletproof.
I cannot see Clinton walking away clean no matter how it plays out.
1. She loses if she is charged and tried whether or not she is convicted.
2. She loses if she is not charged and tried because a vast majority of American voters will believe the fix was in. In Short: Another big shot skating will destroy Clinton as much as a trial.
3. Clinton loses a third way if Trey Gowdy’s Select Committee identifies who gave the stand down order. Whether or not she gave the order —— she knows who did. As secretary of state she was responsible for the deaths of Americans who were abandoned while there was still time to save their lives. She had a chance to say she insisted on sending help. She did not say that. Instead, she evaded the issue when she finally testified. Even if she now claims she tried to send help but was overruled by the commander in chief she is complicit in the murders after the fact.
The first question any competent investigator would ask himself is this: Who benefits the most by deleting the top secret marking from a document? Of course, I am only speculating, but in this case my answer leads to Huma Abedin. What better way to get information to Ikhwan than Clinton’s e-mails?
Nobody talks. Everybody walks. —— just might fall by the wayside when the dominoes start falling. Everybody involved in espionage committed on Hillary’s private server must realize that the Clintons are looking for fall guys (plural). Those insiders surely must have known they were guilty of a crime while they were doing it. Bryan Pagliano’s immunity deal surely told everyone involved that the size of the rewards offered for talking begin to diminish until the FBI takes them off the table entirely.
Incidentally, when Hillary Clinton was co-president nobody could figure out why everybody in the administration remained so loyal. Clintonista loyalty was the ninth wonder of the world in an institution overrun with snakes. I always believed that it was loyalty to Bubba. Remember that Hillary never commanded the loyalty that attaches to every president regardless of how she saw herself.
