Two Theories Explaining The Democrat Agenda

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Oct 6, 2008
126,753
62,573
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
1. I am partial to my theory. It goes like this: if Western Civilization can personify good as "God," I see no problem in accepting the personification of evil as Satan. And the main doctrines of the Democrats, infanticide, racism, censorship, crime, socialism, and injury to America as well as Americans, serve the interests of the Devil.
What could be simpler and more easily defended???
And this:




2. Today, I found this explanation....not all too different.

"Jack Posobiec Explains the Real Agenda Behind Abortion, Gender Wars, and Pretty Much Everything Else the Left Is Pushing

If we examine their arguments for many of their key issues, it all comes down to the notion that we are not miraculously created individuals living in a miraculously created world. Whether they’re arguing in favor of killing babies, mutilating the sexual organs of children, or advancing their climate change narrative, they invariably come back to the notion that “science” says we’re not beings who have had the breath of life breathed into us by a supreme supernatural God. They say we’re here as the result of chemical reactions, that our intellect and life functions are just electrical impulses, and therefore we are insignificant in the collectivist worldview."


3.





I like the cut of this guy's jib.
 
My observation is that bed wetters are relics and left over biological weapons of the former USSR. Their purpose is to destroy the USA, just as all the agents that infiltrated the US government and institutions during the soviet era. Of course marxists have been creeping in the urban gutters long before the fall of the Czar, the soviets recruited them and their influence spread to a point that there is little in the way of them collapsing the federal government. It will be up to the most populous red states to support each other and resist falling into decline with the bed wetter states.
 
Last edited:
Third theory: Demonic possession

I kid you not.



My money is on the satanic theory.

I didn't really believe in the devil until I saw the way the left lost its mind after 2016.

And once I got to the point of believing in the existence of the devil, it was just a quick jump to confirming my belief in God.
 
My observation is that bed wetters are relics and left over biological weapons of the former USSR. They're purpose is to destroy the USA, just as all the agents that infiltrated the US government and institutions during the soviet era. Of course marxists have been creeping in the urban gutters long before the fall of the Czar, the soviets recruited them and their influence spread to a point that there is little in the way of them collapsing the federal government. It will be up to the most populous red states to support each other and resist falling into decline with the bed wetter states.



Now....here is a third theory.....

And...ya' know what?



It resonates.
 
The guy in the OP wrote this: "This is nihilism on steroids. It’s an abomination against the creation."



A great deal of what is in the OP has been around for a while....

Imagine claiming a human life is no different from a grain of sand?

That's exactly what these devil-worshippers ....er, Democrats....believe;



Physicist Victor Stengler writes: “Astronomical observations continue to demonstrate that the earth is no more significant than a single grain of sand on a vast beach.” The more science teaches us about the natural world, the less important the role human beings play in the grand scheme of things. As science writer Tom Bethell notes, “an article of our secular faith that there is nothing exceptional about human life.” Thus, we can add this ‘atheism-article-of-faith’ to the others, materialism, and moral relativism, that form the Cliff-Notes of modern liberalism.

Professor Richard Lewontin, a geneticist (and self-proclaimed Marxist), is certainly one of the world’s leaders in evolutionary biology. He wrote this very revealing comment: “‘We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism.” Lewontin explains why one must accept absurdities: “…we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.”

a. What kind of absurdities? “The God gene hypothesis proposes that a specific gene (VMAT2) predisposes humans towards spiritual or mystic experiences. The idea has been postulated by geneticist Dean Hamer, the director of the Gene Structure and Regulation Unit at the U.S. National Cancer Institute, and author of the 2005 book The God Gene: How Faith is Hardwired into our Genes.”
God gene - Wikipedia



So, it seems that in our time, much of science is involved in an attack on traditional religious thought, and rational men and women must place their faith, and devotion, in this system of belief. And, like any militant church, science places a familiar demand before all others: “Thou shalt have no other gods before me.”
Berlinski
 
They believe it. Good vs. Evil. That's it. The ultimate in tribalism.

For disagreeing with them, you are demonic and satanic and evil.

Their misguided paranoia has rendered them untethered from reality.


I always write in such a way as to encourage debate....and, partly, to prove how dumb your side is.

Case in point...

.... the main doctrines of the Democrats, infanticide, racism, censorship, crime, socialism, and injury to America as well as Americans, serve the interests of the Devil.
What could be simpler and more easily defended???



I BET you can't articulate a better explanation, you gormless idiot.
'


Don't forget the 'thank you' to try to suggest the slap in the kisser didn't hurt.
 
For a scholarly and detailed examination of this theme, I recommend:


1663875417944.png
 
Just as every cop is a criminal
And all the sinners saints
As heads is tails
Just call me Lucifer
'Cause I'm in need of some restraint
Pleased to meet you
Hope you guess my name, oh yeah

Rolling Stones, Sympathy For The Devil

Amazing how accurate that is, huh?



 
Just as every cop is a criminal
And all the sinners saints
As heads is tails
Just call me Lucifer
'Cause I'm in need of some restraint
Pleased to meet you
Hope you guess my name, oh yeah

Rolling Stones, Sympathy For The Devil

Amazing how accurate that is, huh?




I often wish that I had listened to that small voice those many decades ago. I would have saved a lot of money that I spent of demonic music and trashy clothing and club nights.
 
Here’s the differences.


Democrats believe you should make your own decisions about things and the government exists to remove barriers to your success.


Republicans believe you should remove your own barriers to success in society and that the government exists to make decisions for you.


It’s that simple.
 
1. I am partial to my theory. It goes like this: if Western Civilization can personify good as "God," I see no problem in accepting the personification of evil as Satan. And the main doctrines of the Democrats, infanticide, racism, censorship, crime, socialism, and injury to America as well as Americans, serve the interests of the Devil.
What could be simpler and more easily defended???
And this:




2. Today, I found this explanation....not all too different.

"Jack Posobiec Explains the Real Agenda Behind Abortion, Gender Wars, and Pretty Much Everything Else the Left Is Pushing

If we examine their arguments for many of their key issues, it all comes down to the notion that we are not miraculously created individuals living in a miraculously created world. Whether they’re arguing in favor of killing babies, mutilating the sexual organs of children, or advancing their climate change narrative, they invariably come back to the notion that “science” says we’re not beings who have had the breath of life breathed into us by a supreme supernatural God. They say we’re here as the result of chemical reactions, that our intellect and life functions are just electrical impulses, and therefore we are insignificant in the collectivist worldview."


3.





I like the cut of this guy's jib.


The only real answer is that the Democrat party is a cult. They get crazier and nastier, but they only care what other leftists think.

My favorite is how Democrats, who have the same position on every issue, attack Republicans for being monolithic when there are many Republican segments with different views. The most basic being between social conservatives and fiscal conservatives. When Democrats "disagree" it's between two groups with the same positions only disagreeing about priority
 
I often wish that I had listened to that small voice those many decades ago. I would have saved a lot of money that I spent of demonic music and trashy clothing and club nights.


The culture sure didn't make it easy to recognize the truth.

To embrace tolerance is to cease to believe in anything.

Chesterton




I don't know if you read Charles Murray, but he makes the point that we shouldn't worry about offending:
  1. One change in societal attitude has been the “ecumenical niceness”…don’t fight, share toys, take turns….and never, ever be judgmental. As a result, the upper cultural class, which has stabilized by returning to more traditional ways, survives, yet these individuals will not criticize the behaviors which are destroying the lower cultural class.

“For Women Under 30, Most Births Occur Outside Marriage” For Women Under 30, Most Births Occur Outside Marriage (Published 2012)

“One group still largely resists the trend: college graduates, who overwhelmingly marry before having children. That is turning family structure into a new class divide, …” Ibid.​




The elites must preach what they practice.


Stop telling certain groups that out of wedlock children is OK>
 

Forum List

Back
Top