Two questions about our "beloved" Trump

He'll call em a bunch of corrupt pussies (which they are) and then get out his pen for some Executive Orders.

But hey, at this point i'll just be happy we no longer have an Anti-American Foreign Globalist in the White House. The rest will take care of itself.
 
Believe it or not, these 2 questions are, from my perspective, legitimate ones that require a certain amount of stipulation by anyone who wishes to respond.


  1. There is always the possibility that Trump will eventually withdraw from the race; if so, given his bombastic and egotistical persona, what do you think his stated reason will be?

  2. By some remote chance that Trump does win the oval office, and given the real fact that we do still have 3 branches of government, there would be many, many instances when and where Trump will have made one of his usual one-sided promises to Americans and would later find out that congress or the SCOTUS rejected his plan…….The question then is this: HOW would someone like Trump react to the ensuing criticism?
___________________________________-

1. Does not merit a response.

2. Trump does deals. He has stacked out a position that illegals need to go home. It has changed the whole nature of the debate. Just from Trump having a set of balls...and daring to say illegals need to go home...he has blown up the notion that it was cool for Obama to be letting in as many illegals as possible...to be put on the Federal Plantation...and turned into reliable Democrat/Socialist voters.

Obama is for what is good for the Democratic Party...and Trump is for what is good for America.

So, we all know we can't deport all illegal aliens. Trump knows that too. But that is his starting position....and it beats the hell out of the whining we get from Boehner, McConnell, Bush, Romney, McCain...fuck them...they are as bad as the real enemy...the Socialist in the White House.
Why can't we deport all illegal aliens? That claim is total bullshit. It's an excuse for doing nothing conceived by the open borders mafia.
Believe it or not, these 2 questions are, from my perspective, legitimate ones that require a certain amount of stipulation by anyone who wishes to respond.


  1. There is always the possibility that Trump will eventually withdraw from the race; if so, given his bombastic and egotistical persona, what do you think his stated reason will be?

  2. By some remote chance that Trump does win the oval office, and given the real fact that we do still have 3 branches of government, there would be many, many instances when and where Trump will have made one of his usual one-sided promises to Americans and would later find out that congress or the SCOTUS rejected his plan…….The question then is this: HOW would someone like Trump react to the ensuing criticism?
For the first one I suspect he would say something along the lines of he could be more effective and do more good outside of politics for the second I suspect he would use the bully pulpit of the Presidency to try and embarrasse and shame his critics into going along with him something more than a few Presidents have tried over the years.


Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
 
Your questions illustrate why Trump is wholly unqualified to be president – he has no understanding of, or respect for, the Constitution and its case law, nor does he have any concept of responsible governance, and the same can be said of most of his supporters.
replace the word "trump" with "obama" and you're right on the money.
Obama isn't running. Why would you accept something in Trump you don't accept in Obama?
What does trump support that Obama supports?

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
 
Believe it or not, these 2 questions are, from my perspective, legitimate ones that require a certain amount of stipulation by anyone who wishes to respond.


  1. There is always the possibility that Trump will eventually withdraw from the race; if so, given his bombastic and egotistical persona, what do you think his stated reason will be?

  2. By some remote chance that Trump does win the oval office, and given the real fact that we do still have 3 branches of government, there would be many, many instances when and where Trump will have made one of his usual one-sided promises to Americans and would later find out that congress or the SCOTUS rejected his plan…….The question then is this: HOW would someone like Trump react to the ensuing criticism?

I think Trump will use about the same excuse as Ross Pirot did after he screwed Bush 1 out of re-election 4 days prior to the election. Probably something about other business matters, or personal family matters. Maybe medical with himself that no one else will be able to prove--who knows, but I believe it's probably already written in the plan to get Hillary elected. Our Trojan Horse--Donald Trump.

If by some miracle that Donald Trump stays in this race--(which I seriously doubt) and wins the Presidency--someone better keep an eye on the U.S. Treasury--LOL

The good news is these Pinata's are selling like hot cakes in Mexico. They've made the number 1 Pinata sale. See Donald has already made a difference in the Mexican economy.

donald-trump-pinata-1.jpg

This one is full of candy--not B.S--LOL
Trump is going to win the nomination and then the election. He will tear any coceivable Dim candidate to pieces in a debate

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
 
Well, he probably won't call his opponents "racists" like the current admin..

Question

Who has Obama called a racist? I know that other democrats has played the race card, but I do not recall Obama calling someone in particular a racist. Can you show us when? Where is the news story in which Obama described someone as a racist?
 
obama is an anti white marxist who believes in the cloward-pivens strategy along with a dose of alinsky activism to undermine the country.
That's it. Double down on the nuttiness. If that's a sign of things to come this cycle, it'll be Hillary in a cake walk. :mm:
You're doubling down on craven sevility, gullibility and dick sucking.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
 
Why can't we deport all illegal aliens? That claim is total bullshit. It's an excuse for doing nothing conceived by the open borders mafia

I'm kind-of-reminded as to how right wingers might do the above.......


japanposter.jpg
 
Under a Trump administration, we can expect some young Latina to someday write, "The Diary of Anna Sanchez"....or something along those lines, as jack-booted ICE thugs drag she and her family away from some hiding place.
Right, because being returned ed to Mexico to live is the equivalent of being gassed and shoved into an oven.

You open borders numskulls are beyond d belief.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
 
Believe it or not, these 2 questions are, from my perspective, legitimate ones that require a certain amount of stipulation by anyone who wishes to respond.


  1. There is always the possibility that Trump will eventually withdraw from the race; if so, given his bombastic and egotistical persona, what do you think his stated reason will be?

  2. By some remote chance that Trump does win the oval office, and given the real fact that we do still have 3 branches of government, there would be many, many instances when and where Trump will have made one of his usual one-sided promises to Americans and would later find out that congress or the SCOTUS rejected his plan…….The question then is this: HOW would someone like Trump react to the ensuing criticism?

1. He need to withdraw. READ HIS FUCKING BOOK.
This is about leverage and with side is going to pay him off.

 
Under a Trump administration, we can expect some young Latina to someday write, "The Diary of Anna Sanchez"....or something along those lines, as jack-booted ICE thugs drag she and her family away from some hiding place.
Right, because being returned ed to Mexico to live is the equivalent of being gassed and shoved into an oven.

You open borders numskulls are beyond d belief.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

That is rich coming from guy who couldn't resist comparing Democrats to NAZIs for the last number of years.
 
I think Trump would probably spend a LOT of time negotiating with Congress and achieving support before he announced a particular initiative. He has a strong track record of that M.O.

Good response......but, lets review his plan to round up all illegal aliens and his further proposal to repatriate even babies born in the U.S. ....without stating my own opinion on that, let me just state that such a plan IS contrary to the 14th amendment, and Trump's plan could very well be banned by the Supreme Court.

the 14th wasn't ratified legally anyway...The south was governed by provisionary military gvt. after the war of northern aggression.

Dude,

Ye lost, suck it up....
 
Believe it or not, these 2 questions are, from my perspective, legitimate ones that require a certain amount of stipulation by anyone who wishes to respond.


  1. There is always the possibility that Trump will eventually withdraw from the race; if so, given his bombastic and egotistical persona, what do you think his stated reason will be?

  2. By some remote chance that Trump does win the oval office, and given the real fact that we do still have 3 branches of government, there would be many, many instances when and where Trump will have made one of his usual one-sided promises to Americans and would later find out that congress or the SCOTUS rejected his plan…….The question then is this: HOW would someone like Trump react to the ensuing criticism?

I think Trump will use about the same excuse as Ross Pirot did after he screwed Bush 1 out of re-election 4 days prior to the election. Probably something about other business matters, or personal family matters. Maybe medical with himself that no one else will be able to prove--who knows, but I believe it's probably already written in the plan to get Hillary elected. Our Trojan Horse--Donald Trump.

If by some miracle that Donald Trump stays in this race--(which I seriously doubt) and wins the Presidency--someone better keep an eye on the U.S. Treasury--LOL

The good news is these Pinata's are selling like hot cakes in Mexico. They've made the number 1 Pinata sale. See Donald has already made a difference in the Mexican economy.

donald-trump-pinata-1.jpg

This one is full of candy--not B.S--LOL
Trump is going to win the nomination and then the election. He will tear any coceivable Dim candidate to pieces in a debate

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
I'll hold you to it. LOL. He will tear them to pieces In a debate? He's an international embarrassment.
 
Why can't we deport all illegal aliens? That claim is total bullshit. It's an excuse for doing nothing conceived by the open borders mafia

I'm kind-of-reminded as to how right wingers might do the above.......


japanposter.jpg
FDR's policies remind you of right wingers?

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Not what he meant, he referred to right wingers doing something similiar, in the 21st century.
 
I think Trump would probably spend a LOT of time negotiating with Congress and achieving support before he announced a particular initiative. He has a strong track record of that M.O.

Good response......but, lets review his plan to round up all illegal aliens and his further proposal to repatriate even babies born in the U.S. ....without stating my own opinion on that, let me just state that such a plan IS contrary to the 14th amendment, and Trump's plan could very well be banned by the Supreme Court.


Worcester v. Georgia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In a popular quotation that is believed to be apocryphal, President Andrew Jackson reportedly responded: "John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!" This derives from Jackson's comments on the case in a letter to John Coffee, "...the decision of the Supreme Court has fell still born, and they find that they cannot coerce Georgia to yield to its mandate," (that is, the Court's opinion because it had no power to enforce its edict).[1]

The ruling in Worcester ordered that Worcester be freed, and Georgia complied after several months. In 1833, the newly elected governor, Wilson Lumpkin, offered to pardon Worcester and Butler if they ceased their activities among the Cherokee. The two complied and were freed (under the authority of a January 14, 1833 general proclamation, not a formal pardon).[2] They never returned to Cherokee land.

The federal government and the Cherokee were not party to the suit. Worcester imposed no obligations on Jackson; there was nothing for him to enforce.[3][4] The Court did not ask federal marshals to carry out the decision, as had become standard.[5] Worcester may be seen as a prudential decision, for avoiding the possibility of political conflict between the Court and the Executive, while still delivering what appeared to be a pro-Indian decision.[6]

As a tribal sovereignty precedent[edit]
Marshall's language in Worcester may have been motivated by his regret that his earlier opinions inFletcher and Johnson had been used as a justification for Georgia's actions. Justice Story considered it similarly, writing in a letter to his wife dated March 4, 1832: "Thanks be to God, the Court can wash their hands clean of the iniquity of oppressing the Indians and disregarding their rights."[7] Because Jackson proceeded with Cherokee removal,Worcester did not aid indigenous rights at the time.

Worcester has been cited in several later opinions on the subject of tribal sovereignty in the United States.

lets review his plan to round up all illegal aliens and his further proposal to repatriate even babies born in the U.S. ....without stating my own opinion on that, let me just state that such a plan IS contrary to the 14th amendment.

Wow... Yeah, let's not state your opinion, okay? First of all, Trump has never said "round up all illegal aliens" ...EVER! So you've began your "non-opinionated" statement with an outright lie. If you were worth anything, Trump could sue you for slander.

Secondly... You don't know what is or isn't contrary to the 14th, you are not on the Supreme Court, you don't represent the entire Supreme Court and no such case has been presented to the Supreme Court as of this time.... So what the fuck, Mr. Non-opinion.

I'm not even sure the SCOTUS has jurisdiction over this.
 
Well, he probably won't call his opponents "racists" like the current admin..

Question

Who has Obama called a racist? I know that other democrats has played the race card, but I do not recall Obama calling someone in particular a racist. Can you show us when? Where is the news story in which Obama described someone as a racist?

I dunno..I said the current admin., didn't I?
..go look up some of holder's comments, for instance.."racial animus"...that's how an "intelligent" negro says white people are "racists" without pointing a finger...He advocated affirmative action (Positive Discrimination) should be permanent..
holder was/is so wrapped up in race and exacting racial revenge that he stopped even trying to cover it in the latter part of his term.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top