BluesLegend
Diamond Member
One SNAP welfare entitler DEMANDED taxpayers feed her 7 kids by 7 different men. So 7 deadbeat dads can't feed the kids???
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No one goes hungry in this country.Children going hungry isnt an emergency?
That would require an inkling of responsibilityOne SNAP welfare entitler DEMANDED taxpayers feed her 7 kids by 7 different men. So 7 deadbeat dads can't feed the kids???
You actually bought that trolling report?One SNAP welfare entitler DEMANDED taxpayers feed her 7 kids by 7 different men. So 7 deadbeat dads can't feed the kids???

Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. § 2027)Sure. What the statute did you look at to come to this conclusion?
Why don’t Republicans give Democrats a CR Democrats want? That’s all it takes.Not when all it takes is 5 Democrats to defy their leadership and re-open the government.
The contingency fund already has 6 billions in it. You embarrassed yourself by pretending the fund had to be voted on.You know, with the pixy dust fairy money. Stupid F judges should have ordered Democrats to fund it.
What percentage of food stamp recipients has 7 kids?One SNAP welfare entitler DEMANDED taxpayers feed her 7 kids by 7 different men. So 7 deadbeat dads can't feed the kids???
Oddly enough 7%What percentage of food stamp recipients has 7 kids?
Source?Oddly enough 7%
~~~~~~>Democrats are not refusing this particular money to flow. They were in court asking the judge to let this money flow. Trump’s minions didn’t want it to flow.
They gave them the the exact CR that they voted for 13 times in the past 4 years. what is the problem with the CR?Why don’t Republicans give Democrats a CR Democrats want? That’s all it takes.
What an idol. The judge ordered Donald Trump‘s administration to pay this money, even during the shut down because the money was already set aside.

Look into it further yourself if you feel ruffledSource?
Why are you lying? There is no emergency funding in that statue.Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. § 2027)
Not when it s planned political ploy. NopeChildren going hungry isnt an emergency?
How about the send each state $50,000 and tell to make it last.There is no “contingency” fund per se.
But let’s pretend that the provisions of the funding for SNAP — involving approximately 5.25 billion (currently) for shortfalls — were what these judges were claiming to order the President to release were to get released. How long would that last?
About 20 days.
And the set-aside funds are for shortfalls. It provides for the secretary to then direct the states to lower the allotments to recipients. It doesn’t say diddly shit about using the funds to cover congressional inaction such as a government shutdown.
I would suppose that the judges are all about being kind to the poverty stricken — even though the law doesn’t grant any court any authority to demand that the Secretary or the President make use of funds set aside for other purposes.
Once again, federal judges aren’t legislators. And they don’t have any actual authority to do what those two just “ordered.”
What percentage of food stamp recipients has 7 kids?
Elections have consequences and one of them is that the majority doesn't have to surrender to the minority when it engages in parliamentary maneuvers.Why don’t Republicans give Democrats a CR Democrats want? That’s all it takes.
That’s correct. There isn’t. The idiot probably used ChatGPT but didn’t bother to read that section, himself.Why are you lying? There is no emergency funding in that statue.