Turns Out Rev. Pat Robertson Was Right About Feminism in 1992

[Weatherman2020]

Your link:

"A fund-raising letter written by the television evangelist Pat Robertson in opposition to a proposed equal rights amendment to the Iowa Constitution suggests that feminists want women to kill their children and practice witchcraft.

"The equal rights amendment, on which Iowans will vote Nov. 3, is a broadly worded measure that would bar sex discrimination.

"But Mr. Robertson's letter, distributed late last month to supporters of the evangelical organization Christian Coalition, described the proposal as part of a 'feminist agenda' that 'is not about equal rights for women.' Claims of 'Anti-Family'"

Conservatives like Robinson have an inherent fear of level playing fields, which is why he conflates sex discrimination with witchcraft.

Pat Robertson: Preacher? Prophet? Politician? Con-man? Fascist? Yes And So Are The Rest Of Those Phoney So-Called “Christians.”

Well, Shitforbrains, nobody wanted that dumbass Amendment. Because it was dumbass. Like you.

Males...so afraid of these words:
Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

Well..some are..and some aren't..getting to be..most aren't. Some women are invested in all men being misogynists under the skin..that also is a false and, dare i say it, stupid position.

Takes a real dumbass Leftard moron to think people can be discriminated upon.

Unless they are white Christians of course.

Scary Scary words.....
Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

Get back in the kitchen. You know you’re not even welcome to compete in sports.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Well, first, let me affirm my fervent approval of unlimited recreational sex! Second, as a responsible human, contraception is my equally my responsibility--thus a condom.
As for the rest:

All birth control methods have decent failure rates, even as high as 27%.

Contraception | Reproductive Health | CDC

There is no 'responsible' way to have sex. IF you cant stand having a baby, then don't ****.

 

[Lysistrata]

Why is all this bashing of the idea of equality going on all of a sudden? A male who cannot stand proudly next to an equal woman is not a man. He's a gutless coward who must try to incapacitate others through unfair means in order to feel strong. Nothing beats love, loyalty, and a commitment to always having your partner's back.

As for "unlimited recreational sex," I wish that there was some way to take a poll as to whether people are for it or against it. Examine your own lives and your own thoughts. I think that "for it" folks would greatly outnumber the men and and women who only want to have sex when they are open to a baby being the result.

If only men were polled, what do you think the outcome would be? Where are these armies of men who think that sex is just for procreation? If you are married, do you really want to be the father of six or eight or ten that you will have to support and nurture until adulthood (lots of diapers and scampering toddlers) or do you just want a cuddle with your wife?

Get real, people.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Why is all this bashing of the idea of equality going on all of a sudden? A male who cannot stand proudly next to an equal woman is not a man. He's a gutless coward who must try to incapacitate others through unfair means in order to feel strong. Nothing beats love, loyalty, and a commitment to always having your partner's back.

As for "unlimited recreational sex," I wish that there was some way to take a poll as to whether people are for it or against it. Examine your own lives and your own thoughts. I think that "for it" folks would greatly outnumber the men and and women who only want to have sex when they are open to a baby being the result.

If only men were polled, what do you think the outcome would be? Where are these armies of men who think that sex is just for procreation? If you are married, do you really want to be the father of six or eight or ten that you will have to support and nurture until adulthood (lots of diapers and scampering toddlers) or do you just want a cuddle with your wife?

Get real, people.

Let us know when a feminist is satisfied with being equal.

 

[Lysistrata]

Why is all this bashing of the idea of equality going on all of a sudden? A male who cannot stand proudly next to an equal woman is not a man. He's a gutless coward who must try to incapacitate others through unfair means in order to feel strong. Nothing beats love, loyalty, and a commitment to always having your partner's back.

As for "unlimited recreational sex," I wish that there was some way to take a poll as to whether people are for it or against it. Examine your own lives and your own thoughts. I think that "for it" folks would greatly outnumber the men and and women who only want to have sex when they are open to a baby being the result.

If only men were polled, what do you think the outcome would be? Where are these armies of men who think that sex is just for procreation? If you are married, do you really want to be the father of six or eight or ten that you will have to support and nurture until adulthood (lots of diapers and scampering toddlers) or do you just want a cuddle with your wife?
Get real, people.

Let us know when a feminist is satisfied with being equal.

I don't understand what you mean. I'm talking mutual support among heterosexuals, standing together. What is this "feminist" stuff? Heterosexuality, if you are a male, means you stand with your woman, you have her back, and the same is true the other way around. If you can stand up only with a person you have hobbled in some way, you are nothing. You don't like LGBTs, but you can't stand up for heterosexuals, either.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Why is all this bashing of the idea of equality going on all of a sudden? A male who cannot stand proudly next to an equal woman is not a man. He's a gutless coward who must try to incapacitate others through unfair means in order to feel strong. Nothing beats love, loyalty, and a commitment to always having your partner's back.

As for "unlimited recreational sex," I wish that there was some way to take a poll as to whether people are for it or against it. Examine your own lives and your own thoughts. I think that "for it" folks would greatly outnumber the men and and women who only want to have sex when they are open to a baby being the result.

If only men were polled, what do you think the outcome would be? Where are these armies of men who think that sex is just for procreation? If you are married, do you really want to be the father of six or eight or ten that you will have to support and nurture until adulthood (lots of diapers and scampering toddlers) or do you just want a cuddle with your wife?
Get real, people.

Let us know when a feminist is satisfied with being equal.

I don't understand what you mean. I'm talking mutual support among heterosexuals, standing together. What is this "feminist" stuff? Heterosexuality, if you are a male, means you stand with your woman, you have her back, and the same is true the other way around. If you can stand up only with a person you have hobbled in some way, you are nothing. You don't like LGBTs, but you can't stand up for heterosexuals, either.

I’m sick of the liars claiming women are not equal in American society.

 

[georgephillip]

“It is about a socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians.”

ROBERTSON LETTER ATTACKS FEMINISTS

Even the witches who went after Kavanaugh prove it.

Witches cast spell on Brett Kavanaugh

Your link:

"A fund-raising letter written by the television evangelist Pat Robertson in opposition to a proposed equal rights amendment to the Iowa Constitution suggests that feminists want women to kill their children and practice witchcraft.

"The equal rights amendment, on which Iowans will vote Nov. 3, is a broadly worded measure that would bar sex discrimination.

"But Mr. Robertson's letter, distributed late last month to supporters of the evangelical organization Christian Coalition, described the proposal as part of a 'feminist agenda' that 'is not about equal rights for women.' Claims of 'Anti-Family'"

Conservatives like Robinson have an inherent fear of level playing fields, which is why he conflates sex discrimination with witchcraft.

Pat Robertson: Preacher? Prophet? Politician? Con-man? Fascist? Yes And So Are The Rest Of Those Phoney So-Called “Christians.”

You can't out-level the playing field of millions of years of human biological development and sexual role by naming it a redefinable social construct, no matter how hard you try or wish you could.

You can't out-level the playing field of millions of years of human biological development and sexual role by naming it a redefinable social construct, no matter how hard you try or wish you could.

What basis for excluding 50% of humanity from the right of equal opportunity are you basing your opinion on?

Sadly, none at all. Tis you my internet acquaintance who are hell bent on labelling all women as an inherently, naturally weak group of perpetual victims. Seems eons of human biological development would beg to differ. Women have always been the strongest among us. They do not require your permission to not be victims. Women have been ruling the world from behind the curtain long before any concept of feminism was created to use them as a collective victim's group for political currency.

Women have always been the strongest among us. They do not require your permission to not be victims. Women have been ruling the world from behind the curtain long before any concept of feminism was created to use them as a collective victim's group for political currency.

"1869

"The American Equal Rights Association is wrecked by disagreements over the Fourteenth Amendment and the question of whether to support the proposed Fifteenth Amendment which would enfranchise Black American males while avoiding the question of woman suffrage entirely."

Women were chattel in the "Land of the Free" for centuries because conservative males found the concept of equality threatening, and women are still earning less today than male counterparts for doing the same jobs.

Woman Suffrage Timeline (1840-1920) — History of U.S. Woman's Suffrage

 

[Lysistrata]

Why is all this bashing of the idea of equality going on all of a sudden? A male who cannot stand proudly next to an equal woman is not a man. He's a gutless coward who must try to incapacitate others through unfair means in order to feel strong. Nothing beats love, loyalty, and a commitment to always having your partner's back.

As for "unlimited recreational sex," I wish that there was some way to take a poll as to whether people are for it or against it. Examine your own lives and your own thoughts. I think that "for it" folks would greatly outnumber the men and and women who only want to have sex when they are open to a baby being the result.

If only men were polled, what do you think the outcome would be? Where are these armies of men who think that sex is just for procreation? If you are married, do you really want to be the father of six or eight or ten that you will have to support and nurture until adulthood (lots of diapers and scampering toddlers) or do you just want a cuddle with your wife?
Get real, people.

Let us know when a feminist is satisfied with being equal.

I don't understand what you mean. I'm talking mutual support among heterosexuals, standing together. What is this "feminist" stuff? Heterosexuality, if you are a male, means you stand with your woman, you have her back, and the same is true the other way around. If you can stand up only with a person you have hobbled in some way, you are nothing. You don't like LGBTs, but you can't stand up for heterosexuals, either.

I’m sick of the liars claiming women are not equal in American society.

I don't give a flying fart about what you are "sick of." I can see that you are incapable of joining hands with your fellow heterosexuals and walking forward into the future. If you are married, does your wife know how much you disrespect her? You present yourself as quite weak.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Why is all this bashing of the idea of equality going on all of a sudden? A male who cannot stand proudly next to an equal woman is not a man. He's a gutless coward who must try to incapacitate others through unfair means in order to feel strong. Nothing beats love, loyalty, and a commitment to always having your partner's back.

As for "unlimited recreational sex," I wish that there was some way to take a poll as to whether people are for it or against it. Examine your own lives and your own thoughts. I think that "for it" folks would greatly outnumber the men and and women who only want to have sex when they are open to a baby being the result.

If only men were polled, what do you think the outcome would be? Where are these armies of men who think that sex is just for procreation? If you are married, do you really want to be the father of six or eight or ten that you will have to support and nurture until adulthood (lots of diapers and scampering toddlers) or do you just want a cuddle with your wife?
Get real, people.

Let us know when a feminist is satisfied with being equal.

I don't understand what you mean. I'm talking mutual support among heterosexuals, standing together. What is this "feminist" stuff? Heterosexuality, if you are a male, means you stand with your woman, you have her back, and the same is true the other way around. If you can stand up only with a person you have hobbled in some way, you are nothing. You don't like LGBTs, but you can't stand up for heterosexuals, either.

I’m sick of the liars claiming women are not equal in American society.

I don't give a flying fart about what you are "sick of." I can see that you are incapable of joining hands with your fellow heterosexuals and walking forward into the future. If you are married, does your wife know how much you disrespect her? You present yourself as quite weak.

Go away beta boy.

 

[georgephillip]

Why is all this bashing of the idea of equality going on all of a sudden? A male who cannot stand proudly next to an equal woman is not a man. He's a gutless coward who must try to incapacitate others through unfair means in order to feel strong. Nothing beats love, loyalty, and a commitment to always having your partner's back.

As for "unlimited recreational sex," I wish that there was some way to take a poll as to whether people are for it or against it. Examine your own lives and your own thoughts. I think that "for it" folks would greatly outnumber the men and and women who only want to have sex when they are open to a baby being the result.

If only men were polled, what do you think the outcome would be? Where are these armies of men who think that sex is just for procreation? If you are married, do you really want to be the father of six or eight or ten that you will have to support and nurture until adulthood (lots of diapers and scampering toddlers) or do you just want a cuddle with your wife?
Get real, people.

Let us know when a feminist is satisfied with being equal.

I don't understand what you mean. I'm talking mutual support among heterosexuals, standing together. What is this "feminist" stuff? Heterosexuality, if you are a male, means you stand with your woman, you have her back, and the same is true the other way around. If you can stand up only with a person you have hobbled in some way, you are nothing. You don't like LGBTs, but you can't stand up for heterosexuals, either.

I’m sick of the liars claiming women are not equal in American society.

I’m sick of the liars claiming women are not equal in American society.

Who told you women were not equal in America?

"About four-in-ten working women (42%) in the United States say they have faced discrimination on the job because of their gender.

"They report a broad array of personal experiences, ranging from earning less than male counterparts for doing the same job to being passed over for important assignments, according to a new analysis of Pew Research Center survey data."

42% of US working women have faced gender discrimination on the job

 

[Weatherman2020]

“It is about a socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians.”

ROBERTSON LETTER ATTACKS FEMINISTS

Even the witches who went after Kavanaugh prove it.

Witches cast spell on Brett Kavanaugh

Your link:

"A fund-raising letter written by the television evangelist Pat Robertson in opposition to a proposed equal rights amendment to the Iowa Constitution suggests that feminists want women to kill their children and practice witchcraft.

"The equal rights amendment, on which Iowans will vote Nov. 3, is a broadly worded measure that would bar sex discrimination.

"But Mr. Robertson's letter, distributed late last month to supporters of the evangelical organization Christian Coalition, described the proposal as part of a 'feminist agenda' that 'is not about equal rights for women.' Claims of 'Anti-Family'"

Conservatives like Robinson have an inherent fear of level playing fields, which is why he conflates sex discrimination with witchcraft.

Pat Robertson: Preacher? Prophet? Politician? Con-man? Fascist? Yes And So Are The Rest Of Those Phoney So-Called “Christians.”

You can't out-level the playing field of millions of years of human biological development and sexual role by naming it a redefinable social construct, no matter how hard you try or wish you could.

You can't out-level the playing field of millions of years of human biological development and sexual role by naming it a redefinable social construct, no matter how hard you try or wish you could.

What basis for excluding 50% of humanity from the right of equal opportunity are you basing your opinion on?

Sadly, none at all. Tis you my internet acquaintance who are hell bent on labelling all women as an inherently, naturally weak group of perpetual victims. Seems eons of human biological development would beg to differ. Women have always been the strongest among us. They do not require your permission to not be victims. Women have been ruling the world from behind the curtain long before any concept of feminism was created to use them as a collective victim's group for political currency.

Women have always been the strongest among us. They do not require your permission to not be victims. Women have been ruling the world from behind the curtain long before any concept of feminism was created to use them as a collective victim's group for political currency.

"1869

"The American Equal Rights Association is wrecked by disagreements over the Fourteenth Amendment and the question of whether to support the proposed Fifteenth Amendment which would enfranchise Black American males while avoiding the question of woman suffrage entirely."

Women were chattel in the "Land of the Free" for centuries because conservative males found the concept of equality threatening, and women are still earning less today than male counterparts for doing the same jobs.

Woman Suffrage Timeline (1840-1920) — History of U.S. Woman's Suffrage

I’m so happy the Left have made it impossible for women to compete in their silly sports games anymore.

 

[JoeB131]

Well, Shitforbrains, nobody wanted that dumbass Amendment. Because it was dumbass. Like you.

Actually, the two big arguments against the ERA at the time is that there would be women in combat and unisex restrooms.

Well. We have women in combat now and a lot of places have unisex bathrooms...

So why was that amendment dumbass again?

 

[JoeB131]

I’m so happy the Left have made it impossible for women to compete in their silly sports games anymore.

So?

Sure women are competing. It's just that Cis women are competing against Trans women now.

Of course, the chances of you encountering a Trans person are so small to be a rare event. I think I've only known one in 57 years of being around.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Why is all this bashing of the idea of equality going on all of a sudden? A male who cannot stand proudly next to an equal woman is not a man. He's a gutless coward who must try to incapacitate others through unfair means in order to feel strong. Nothing beats love, loyalty, and a commitment to always having your partner's back.

As for "unlimited recreational sex," I wish that there was some way to take a poll as to whether people are for it or against it. Examine your own lives and your own thoughts. I think that "for it" folks would greatly outnumber the men and and women who only want to have sex when they are open to a baby being the result.

If only men were polled, what do you think the outcome would be? Where are these armies of men who think that sex is just for procreation? If you are married, do you really want to be the father of six or eight or ten that you will have to support and nurture until adulthood (lots of diapers and scampering toddlers) or do you just want a cuddle with your wife?
Get real, people.

Let us know when a feminist is satisfied with being equal.

I don't understand what you mean. I'm talking mutual support among heterosexuals, standing together. What is this "feminist" stuff? Heterosexuality, if you are a male, means you stand with your woman, you have her back, and the same is true the other way around. If you can stand up only with a person you have hobbled in some way, you are nothing. You don't like LGBTs, but you can't stand up for heterosexuals, either.

I’m sick of the liars claiming women are not equal in American society.

I’m sick of the liars claiming women are not equal in American society.

Who told you women were not equal in America?

"About four-in-ten working women (42%) in the United States say they have faced discrimination on the job because of their gender.

"They report a broad array of personal experiences, ranging from earning less than male counterparts for doing the same job to being passed over for important assignments, according to a new analysis of Pew Research Center survey data."

42% of US working women have faced gender discrimination on the job

And 92% of ugly people are discriminated against. Cry me a River.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Well, Shitforbrains, nobody wanted that dumbass Amendment. Because it was dumbass. Like you.

Actually, the two big arguments against the ERA at the time is that there would be women in combat and unisex restrooms.

Well. We have women in combat now and a lot of places have unisex bathrooms...

So why was that amendment dumbass again?

Or women not being allowed to succeed in sports.

 

[initforme]

So according to pat women slowly breaking out of staying in the kitchen and into the world is a bad thing. Seems like another rich guy being clueless as to the real world of two people HAVING to work to BARELY hold on and SCRAPE by. He preaches responsibility yet........

 

[JoeB131]

Or women not being allowed to succeed in sports.

Sure they can... they just have to run faster than the tranny.

In some sports, being Cis-gender is an advantage.

"Oh, noes, I might lose in a sporting event no one watches or cares about."

 

[georgephillip]

Your link:

"A fund-raising letter written by the television evangelist Pat Robertson in opposition to a proposed equal rights amendment to the Iowa Constitution suggests that feminists want women to kill their children and practice witchcraft.

"The equal rights amendment, on which Iowans will vote Nov. 3, is a broadly worded measure that would bar sex discrimination.

"But Mr. Robertson's letter, distributed late last month to supporters of the evangelical organization Christian Coalition, described the proposal as part of a 'feminist agenda' that 'is not about equal rights for women.' Claims of 'Anti-Family'"

Conservatives like Robinson have an inherent fear of level playing fields, which is why he conflates sex discrimination with witchcraft.

Pat Robertson: Preacher? Prophet? Politician? Con-man? Fascist? Yes And So Are The Rest Of Those Phoney So-Called “Christians.”

You can't out-level the playing field of millions of years of human biological development and sexual role by naming it a redefinable social construct, no matter how hard you try or wish you could.

You can't out-level the playing field of millions of years of human biological development and sexual role by naming it a redefinable social construct, no matter how hard you try or wish you could.

What basis for excluding 50% of humanity from the right of equal opportunity are you basing your opinion on?

Sadly, none at all. Tis you my internet acquaintance who are hell bent on labelling all women as an inherently, naturally weak group of perpetual victims. Seems eons of human biological development would beg to differ. Women have always been the strongest among us. They do not require your permission to not be victims. Women have been ruling the world from behind the curtain long before any concept of feminism was created to use them as a collective victim's group for political currency.

Women have always been the strongest among us. They do not require your permission to not be victims. Women have been ruling the world from behind the curtain long before any concept of feminism was created to use them as a collective victim's group for political currency.

"1869

"The American Equal Rights Association is wrecked by disagreements over the Fourteenth Amendment and the question of whether to support the proposed Fifteenth Amendment which would enfranchise Black American males while avoiding the question of woman suffrage entirely."

Women were chattel in the "Land of the Free" for centuries because conservative males found the concept of equality threatening, and women are still earning less today than male counterparts for doing the same jobs.

Woman Suffrage Timeline (1840-1920) — History of U.S. Woman's Suffrage

I’m so happy the Left have made it impossible for women to compete in their silly sports games anymore.

I’m so happy the Left have made it impossible for women to compete in their silly sports games anymore.

Editorial cartoon: Donald Trump’s misogyny - The Boston Globe

 

[Nia88]

A person's whole argument goes out the window when you start talking about witchcraft.

 

[Lysistrata]

Why is all this bashing of the idea of equality going on all of a sudden? A male who cannot stand proudly next to an equal woman is not a man. He's a gutless coward who must try to incapacitate others through unfair means in order to feel strong. Nothing beats love, loyalty, and a commitment to always having your partner's back.

As for "unlimited recreational sex," I wish that there was some way to take a poll as to whether people are for it or against it. Examine your own lives and your own thoughts. I think that "for it" folks would greatly outnumber the men and and women who only want to have sex when they are open to a baby being the result.

If only men were polled, what do you think the outcome would be? Where are these armies of men who think that sex is just for procreation? If you are married, do you really want to be the father of six or eight or ten that you will have to support and nurture until adulthood (lots of diapers and scampering toddlers) or do you just want a cuddle with your wife?
Get real, people.

Let us know when a feminist is satisfied with being equal.

I don't understand what you mean. I'm talking mutual support among heterosexuals, standing together. What is this "feminist" stuff? Heterosexuality, if you are a male, means you stand with your woman, you have her back, and the same is true the other way around. If you can stand up only with a person you have hobbled in some way, you are nothing. You don't like LGBTs, but you can't stand up for heterosexuals, either.

I’m sick of the liars claiming women are not equal in American society.

I don't give a flying fart about what you are "sick of." I can see that you are incapable of joining hands with your fellow heterosexuals and walking forward into the future. If you are married, does your wife know how much you disrespect her? You present yourself as quite weak.

Go away beta boy.

Oh, sputtering are you?

I'm a woman, jerk. But I like real men.