Turley on Hunter Biden Plea Deal: ‘This Is Going to Look Like You Ticketed the Getaway Driver After a Bank Robbery’

Turley on Hunter Biden Plea Deal:

‘This Is Going to Look Like You Ticketed the Getaway Driver After a Bank Robbery’

20 Jun 2023 ~~ By Jeff Poor

Tuesday, during an appearance on FNC’s “America’s Newsroom” after the announcement of the plea deal for Hunter Biden, son of President Joe Biden, Fox News legal analyst and George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley warned the perception of the agreement would not be well received by many.
According to Turley, given the avoidance of jail and the lack of a mention of serious charges, the deal would reinforce the belief that there is a double standard within federal law enforcement.
“This plea deal has the makings of an avoidance of any jail time,” he said. “But more importantly, it was an evasion of the more serious allegations facing Hunter Biden and the Biden family. So, it is historic in the sense that the president’s son is going to plead guilty to criminal acts. It’s going to be very controversial for critics. I think for many, this is going to look like you ticketed the getaway driver after a bank robbery.”


Commentary:

The question remains, who is going to do a damn thing about any of this insanity and crime syndicate protection? The DOJ and the FBI are just as corrupt as the Biden’s and the media will protect all of them.
This is a blatant in your face use of the Two-Tiered System of Justice used by Marxist Democrat, Deep State insider's bureaucrats in Washington.
Its getting tiring, but what did everyone expect? Everyone knows the FSB/DOJ and Stasi/FBI are compromised and corrupt leftists. They are not going to send one of their own to jail. Jail is reserved for their political opponents. We are third world country now.
Compare the following:
In comparison Paul Manafort did significantly less Hunter and got thrown in isolation/prison.
Certainly, no matter what evidence of corruption the Republicans turn up, the corrupt Garland FSB/DOJ and Stasi/FBI will NEVER bring charges against the Biden's. Banana Republic “justice.”


The RW Outrage Machine only cares about driving clicks and responses.

No matter what the Law says, it's never enough! Because the rubes can never be satisfied!

LOL
 
1. It happened. FBI agent Elvis Chan worked with the oligarchs to censor the laptop story and cover up the crimes described in the laptop still being investigated by the House.
“I think you guys got played,” Jordan told Roth. “… I think you guys wanted [the story] to be taken down, I think you meet with these guys every week, we know that’s been established in the Twitter files, you had weekly meetings with Mr. Chan in the run-up to the election. They send you all kinds of emails, they send you documents on the super-secret James Bond Teleporter, you get information on that. I think you guys wanted to take it down. I think you guys got played by the FBI. And that’s the scary part.”

2. The laptop info describes the crimes, the evidence is out there to be collected. The money trail, the whistleblower (Bobulinsky), the money laundering shell companies, etc.

3. On FNC they had three black artists who went to prison for the same crimes. Blacks are being used by the democrats, 2nd class citizens doesn't begin to cover the urban plantation pecking order.
You’re being played by right wing media who doesn’t care about accuracy and truth.
 
You’re being played by right wing media who doesn’t care about accuracy and truth.
I believe Elon Musk who spent $44b to try to save the US from the deep state taking over Twitter..
You can believe the deep state, the MSM, the FBI Gestapo, and the hi-tech oligarchs.
 
I believe Elon Musk who spent $44b to try to save the US from the deep state taking over Twitter..
You can believe the deep state, the MSM, the FBI Gestapo, and the hi-tech oligarchs.
I wouldn’t. Elon Musk is far from honest. He bought Twitter because he got talked into it by a bunch if his Twitter suck ups and couldn’t get out of the deal when he realized it was a stupid idea.
 
Famous rapper's lawyer blasts Hunter Biden's sweetheart deal after his client received prison for same crime
21 Jun 2023 ~~ By Chris Enloe

The lawyer for a prominent rapper is speaking out over Hunter Biden's sweetheart plea deal that allows him to avoid prison for illegally possessing a firearm.
In 2019, rapper Kodak Black pleaded guilty to providing false information on a federal form when purchasing multiple firearms.
Black pleaded guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6), using false statements to obtain a firearm. Biden was charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) and 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2). The latter statute says that anyone who who "knowingly violates" several subsections of 18 U.S.C. § 922, including (a)(6), can be imprisoned for up to 10 years.
Thus in the eyes of the law, Black and Biden committed the same crime. They both provided false information on federal forms to acquire firearms despite being legally disqualified from making those purchases.
Yet Black was sentenced to nearly four years in federal prison for his crime. Biden, on the other hand, was given pre-trial diversion and the opportunity to expunge the charge from his record after 24 months.
Attorney Bradford Cohen, who represents Black, called out the glaring disparity in outcomes.
"There's no such thing as not getting jail time on a gun charge, on any kind of gun charge," Cohen told Fox News. "I've never seen anyone where this offense was charged and they didn't get some sort of prison sentence. And in fact, most of the time in federal court, you very rarely see people get anything but a prison sentence."
Cohen cited the college admissions scandal as evidence that federal authorities rarely let offenders off without spending time behind bars.
"So, in this Felicity Huffman case, to give the woman two weeks in prison, you know that you actually have to surrender yourself going for two weeks, change her clothes out to all this stuff, for literally 14 days. And this guy gets absolutely nothing? I've just never seen it happen," Cohen said.
"A federal crime is supposed to be a federal crime," he explained. "And federal crimes are supposed to be very serious federal crimes, and that's why you look at prison sentences."
Earlier in the day, Cohen suggested Biden's plea deal showed there are two tiers of justice in America.
Cohen wrote on Instagram, "2 tiers of justice? Kodak was charged for the same crime. Got over 3 years. Mr. Biden will not serve a day. Feels right? Do FBI agents and federal authorities take cases personally?"
Rapper Lil Wayne similarly faced significant prison time — up to 10 years — after he pleaded guilty to illegally possessing a firearm, charged under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), the same subsection as Biden.
Wayne, however, never spent time in prison for the crime because Donald Trump pardoned him. Trump also commuted Black's sentence before leaving office.
To be fair, Black and Wayne were repeat offenders with prior criminal histories. Biden, by contrast, does not, which mitigates potential criminal penalties. But to Cohen's point, it's jarring that federal prosecutors would let the gun crime slip away altogether.

Commentary:
Hunter has become the poster boy for leftist white privilege and despotism.
Joey Xi will be out again tomorrow blasting people that have guns and saying the “Rich” don’t pay their taxes. Well, he's partially right, Hunter certainly tried to Not pay is fair share.
Yeah... other than violating the Mann Act, FARA Reulations, prostitution, molesting his teen niece, human sex trafficking, raping a Chinese girl on video, cocaine, bribery in Asia AND in Europe.
Other than that, Hunter is squeaky clean.

**********​
 
Last edited:

Black men are being jailed ‘years’ for ‘same crimes’ as Hunter Biden: Rep. Wesley Hunt​

21 Jun 2023 ~~ By Steve Nelson

Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-Texas) said Wednesday that he was outraged by first son Hunter Biden’s probation-only plea deal for tax and gun crimes, saying that black men are serving prison sentences for similar offenses.
“The American people are sick and tired of this two-tiered justice system and as a black man, I’m tired of seeing this kind of discretion used to favor people like Hunter Biden because he’s white and the son of a president,” Hunt said during a House Judiciary Committee hearing. Apache helicopter pilot, and one of four black House Republicans added a jab at Hunter’s father: “I guess selective justice shouldn’t come as a surprise … after all, Joe Biden was one of the authors of the ’94 crime bill, one of my all time favorites. We can see what that has done to black men across this country.”


Commentary:
The optics for Hunter and te Bidens are still bad, because so many arrests of minorities in large cities where drugs and guns often go hand in hand have been incarcerated.
 
This is all about the RW Outrage Machine and Donald Trump.

The RW Outrage Machine needs enemies. It needs enemies because its viewers need enemies. Outrage keeps viewers engaged. Outrage generates clicks. Outrage makes the RW Outrage Machine bank. And today’s enemy is Hunter Biden.

But Hunter Biden cut a deal with a Trump appointed prosecutor. And, of course, the RW Outrage Machine is outraged! It wouldn’t be anything but! Concluding that the deal was fair isn’t what its viewers want. It’s viewers want to be outraged!

Trump, of course, could have also cut a deal. But that won’t happen. Because cutting a deal is totally off brand. Trump’s a fighter! The Deep State is out to get him! And you! Trump’s fighting The Deep State which is out to get you! Cutting a deal with The Deep State means he’s no longer fighting! For you!

So the RW Outrage Machine keeps its viewers in an alternative reality echo chamber media bubble, where Trump - and its viewers - are perpetual victims while their enemies - Democrats, progressives, The Deep State - somehow always get away with things.

It’s very very profitable.
 
I wouldn’t. Elon Musk is far from honest. He bought Twitter because he got talked into it by a bunch if his Twitter suck ups and couldn’t get out of the deal when he realized it was a stupid idea.
1. Elon proved that the FBI Gestapo was managing the and covering up the laptop crimes, even paying the oligarchs to censor the laptop story from social media.
2. That is fascism. When the government controls the propaganda networks and censors free speech.
3. So you are a fascist.

p.s. prove Elon Musk isn't honest. Releasing the Twitter files proves he is a patriot. Unlike the thugs in the FBI Gestapo.
 
1. Elon proved that the FBI Gestapo was managing the and covering up the laptop crimes, even paying the oligarchs to censor the laptop story from social media.
2. That is fascism. When the government controls the propaganda networks and censors free speech.
3. So you are a fascist.

p.s. prove Elon Musk isn't honest. Releasing the Twitter files proves he is a patriot. Unlike the thugs in the FBI Gestapo.
Elon didn’t prove anything. The Twitter files story was revealed to be largely fabricated and Elon Musk admitted he didn’t do the research to determine if it was true or not.

Taibbi had to agree to numerous unnamed conditions to get access which was never made public in its entirety to allow any actual journalists to review.

It’s easy to point out Musk’s lies.


It’s also easy to demonstrate Musk likes promoting fringe conspiracy stories.

 
Elon didn’t prove anything. The Twitter files story was revealed to be largely fabricated and Elon Musk admitted he didn’t do the research to determine if it was true or not.
Taibbi had to agree to numerous unnamed conditions to get access which was never made public in its entirety to allow any actual journalists to review.

It’s easy to point out Musk’s lies. (secured funding?)

It’s also easy to demonstrate Musk likes promoting fringe conspiracy stories. (Pelosi?}
1. If you can prove the Twitter files story was fabricated prove it. So far my links trump your typing.

Twitter “just freelanced” its baseless decision to censor The Post’s bombshell Hunter Biden laptop scoop in the run up to the 2020 election — with top-level workers at the social media giant agreeing that controversial decision was “f–ked,” damning insider communications released by CEO Elon Musk Friday reveal.
A trove of communications leaked this month from behind the scenes of Twitter has revealed in new detail the company's relationships with a number of government officials and agencies such as the FBI.
Known as the "Twitter files," these threads have unveiled conversations that show security officials were in contact with the social media giant before its takeover by the company's new CEO Elon Musk. Promoted by Musk, the conversations have been presented in chapters by a team of freelance journalists in an attempt to shine a light on the company's decision-making, including the suppression of news stories and the suspension of public figures like Donald Trump.

2. Musk lied about having funding lined up to take Tesla private not about the Twitter files, duh. This thread is about politics.

3. Pelosi's husband? Again, prove that the Twitter files are not true. You can't.
 
1. If you can prove the Twitter files story was fabricated prove it. So far my links trump your typing.

Twitter “just freelanced” its baseless decision to censor The Post’s bombshell Hunter Biden laptop scoop in the run up to the 2020 election — with top-level workers at the social media giant agreeing that controversial decision was “f–ked,” damning insider communications released by CEO Elon Musk Friday reveal.
A trove of communications leaked this month from behind the scenes of Twitter has revealed in new detail the company's relationships with a number of government officials and agencies such as the FBI.
Known as the "Twitter files," these threads have unveiled conversations that show security officials were in contact with the social media giant before its takeover by the company's new CEO Elon Musk. Promoted by Musk, the conversations have been presented in chapters by a team of freelance journalists in an attempt to shine a light on the company's decision-making, including the suppression of news stories and the suspension of public figures like Donald Trump.

2. Musk lied about having funding lined up to take Tesla private not about the Twitter files, duh. This thread is about politics.

3. Pelosi's husband? Again, prove that the Twitter files are not true. You can't.
Medhi Hassan did a good job disproving the Twitter files.


You won’t find the government telling Twitter to take down the laptop story. You can find the Biden campaign telling Twitter to take down nude photos which were a clear violation of Twitter’s policy. Taibbi ignored this very important detail. It’s a lie by omission.

 
5cc498293987de2a358a712b1fdc3e05.jpg
 
Medhi Hassan did a good job disproving the Twitter files.

You won’t find the government telling Twitter to take down the laptop story. You can find the Biden campaign telling Twitter to take down nude photos which were a clear violation of Twitter’s policy. Taibbi ignored this very important detail. It’s a lie by omission.
The twitter files were not disproven. There was nothing there except some bullshit argument about a replacement disinformation board.

The issue is the FBI's Elvis Chan working with Twitter and FB to censor the laptop story similar to the 51 national security experts lying that the laptop was "Russian disinformation."
Neither Musk nor Taibbi recanted the Twitter files.
 
The twitter files were not disproven. There was nothing there except some bullshit argument about a replacement disinformation board.

The issue is the FBI's Elvis Chan working with Twitter and FB to censor the laptop story similar to the 51 national security experts lying that the laptop was "Russian disinformation."
Neither Musk nor Taibbi recanted the Twitter files.
That’s because neither Musk or Taibbi are particularly honest.

There were serious factual errors in the reporting and lies of omission. This has been proven. You want to ignore and minimize it, but you can’t.

Elvis Chan never told Twitter to suppress the laptop story. That’s simply a fact.

The 51 former intelligence officials have a right to provide their opinion on the matter. They didn’t lie, they stated their suspicion based on the facts that were known. What is your issue with them? That they used their freedom of speech to say something you don’t like?
 
That’s because neither Musk or Taibbi are particularly honest. There were serious factual errors in the reporting and lies of omission. This has been proven. You want to ignore and minimize it, but you can’t. Elvis Chan never told Twitter to suppress the laptop story. That’s simply a fact.

The 51 former intelligence officials have a right to provide their opinion on the matter. They didn’t lie, they stated their suspicion based on the facts that were known. What is your issue with them? That they used their freedom of speech to say something you don’t like?
1. You type words without proving anything. My assertions can be verified using google

2. Blinken coordinated the 51 traitors to call the laptop crimes "Russian Disinformation".
 
You type words without proving anything. My assertions can be verified using google
You apparently didn’t read your articles.

“Although the contents of the documents Chan sentare unknown, the timing is suspect and was in keeping with the FBI’s efforts to squelch free speech on the platform on grounds of guarding against “foreign interference in elections,” Shellenberger said.”

Your allegation isn’t based on facts.

Blinken coordinated the 51 traitors to call the laptop crimes "Russian Disinformation".

Again, your own article.
“The letter stated that these former intelligence officials, based on their past experience, had serious concerns that the laptop had the potential to be linked to Russian disinformation efforts.


But it also did not make a determination on if the reported contents of the laptop were genuine, and said they had no evidence to link Russia with the story.”

You have a habit of half truths.
 
You apparently didn’t read your articles.

“Although the contents of the documents Chan sent are unknown, the timing is suspect and was in keeping with the FBI’s efforts to squelch free speech on the platform on grounds of guarding against “foreign interference in elections,” Shellenberger said.”
Your allegation isn’t based on facts.

Again, your own article.
“The letter stated that these former intelligence officials, based on their past experience, had serious concerns that the laptop had the potential to be linked to Russian disinformation efforts.
But it also did not make a determination on if the reported contents of the laptop were genuine, and said they had no evidence to link Russia with the story.” You have a habit of half truths.
1. Depends where you read. Your quote doesn't prove anything.
"Chan argued in court that a letter from Meta stated that he was not the person from the FBI who conveyed communications to the company about the Hunter Biden laptop. But that claim was disputed by the AGs who maintain that a counsel for Meta in a September 2022 phone call verbally identified Chan as the FBI official directly involved in the communications between the Big Tech platform and the law enforcement agency on President Joe Biden’s son’s laptop."

2. Blinken coordinated the lie. The voters got scammed. The US got 4-years of senile Joe.

Spies who lie: 51 ‘intelligence’ experts refuse to apologize for discrediting true Hunter Biden story​

 
1. Depends where you read. Your quote doesn't prove anything.
"Chan argued in court that a letter from Meta stated that he was not the person from the FBI who conveyed communications to the company about the Hunter Biden laptop. But that claim was disputed by the AGs who maintain that a counsel for Meta in a September 2022 phone call verbally identified Chan as the FBI official directly involved in the communications between the Big Tech platform and the law enforcement agency on President Joe Biden’s son’s laptop."

2. Blinken coordinated the lie. The voters got scammed. The US got 4-years of senile Joe.

Spies who lie: 51 ‘intelligence’ experts refuse to apologize for discrediting true Hunter Biden story​

My quote proves the story isn’t based on facts, but suspicion.

We have yet to see a single verifiable fact that Elvis Chan or anyone at the FBI told anyone in social media to reduce the visibility of the NY Post story.
 
This is all about the RW Outrage Machine and Donald Trump.

The RW Outrage Machine needs enemies. It needs enemies because its viewers need enemies. Outrage keeps viewers engaged. Outrage generates clicks. Outrage makes the RW Outrage Machine bank. And today’s enemy is Hunter Biden.

But Hunter Biden cut a deal with a Trump appointed prosecutor. And, of course, the RW Outrage Machine is outraged! It wouldn’t be anything but! Concluding that the deal was fair isn’t what its viewers want. It’s viewers want to be outraged!

Trump, of course, could have also cut a deal. But that won’t happen. Because cutting a deal is totally off brand. Trump’s a fighter! The Deep State is out to get him! And you! Trump’s fighting The Deep State which is out to get you! Cutting a deal with The Deep State means he’s no longer fighting! For you!

So the RW Outrage Machine keeps its viewers in an alternative reality echo chamber media bubble, where Trump - and its viewers - are perpetual victims while their enemies - Democrats, progressives, The Deep State - somehow always get away with things.

It’s very very profitable.
~~~~~~
Your OP is a total smoking pile of Bull Scatology.
 
My quote proves the story isn’t based on facts, but suspicion.
We have yet to see a single verifiable fact that Elvis Chan or anyone at the FBI told anyone in social media to reduce the visibility of the NY Post story.
Typing more bullshit with no links. Thanks for playing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top