Tulsi Gabbard next under the bus?

[pknopp]

So now you are a Tulsi lover?

She has now countered Obama's lies and Trump's lies. One does have to give her credit there.

 

[JoeB131]

Trump is correct. Pretty much everyone knows where they were headed but you. Again, what is the purpose of enriching uranium to almost weapons grade? There is no reason other than:

1. getting themselves ready to make a bomb

2. as a negotiating tactic

Either way, they gambled and lost. When you play with fire you get burned. They continued claiming they weren't going to make a bomb while continually enriching uranium to almost weapons grade. Iraq also played the game of making everyone think they had weapons of mass destruction and paid a heavy price for it. In the end, the world is better off now than before we attacked Iraq. Same will be true of Iran.

Iran has been supposedly on the cusp of getting the Bomb for 30 years now, to hear the Zionists tell it.

Frankly, attacking Iran makes it more likely that they will get the bomb, not less.

Because if you aren't willing to follow it up with ground troops, eventually, you run out of those very expensive bombs.

 

[JoeB131]

She has now countered Obama's lies and Trump's lies. One does have to give her credit there.

For what, being a loon?

The thing is, most of the Intel Community would be happy to see her go, so expect them to start sandbagging her as the war ramps up.

 

[JoeB131]

Because overall he is doing a great job. ...

Really?

YOu didn't see Tammy Duckworth rip him a new one? It was epic.

 

[pknopp]

For what, being a loon?

The thing is, most of the Intel Community would be happy to see her go, so expect them to start sandbagging her as the war ramps up.

"Intel community' is a oxymoron so............

 

[Independent thinker]

Iran has been supposedly on the cusp of getting the Bomb for 30 years now, to hear the Zionists tell it.

Frankly, attacking Iran makes it more likely that they will get the bomb, not less.

Because if you aren't willing to follow it up with ground troops, eventually, you run out of those very expensive bombs.

Over 30 years they have gotten closer and closer and are now at the precipice. That's why Israel attacked. They got tired of the world just letting Iran get closer and closer. Even Iran admits and brags about enriching uranium to a hair width away from weapons grade.

 

[citygator]

Trump appointed Gabbard and Hegseth to Troll the left, but now it is becoming apparent they aren't up to the job.

So we are about to go to war with a DNI and SecDef who don't know what they are doing and the President doesn't really listen to anymore.

Well said.

 

[JoeB131]

"Intel community' is a oxymoron so............

Not at all.

They are good at their jobs.

It's what the elected officials do with that information that's the problem.

 

[Lesh]

Over 30 years they have gotten closer and closer and are now at the precipice. That's why Israel attacked. They got tired of the world just letting Iran get closer and closer. Even Iran admits and brags about enriching uranium to a hair width away from weapons grade.

Saddam made the same kinds of claims

How’d that work out?

 

[Independent thinker]

Saddam made the same kinds of claims

How’d that work out?

Exactly the point! It worked out much better for the world. Except, in this case, we have inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities which prove Iran has been enriching uranium to higher and higher levels, far higher than for peaceful purposes. Are you a fact denier?

 

[JoeB131]

Over 30 years they have gotten closer and closer and are now at the precipice. That's why Israel attacked. They got tired of the world just letting Iran get closer and closer. Even Iran admits and brags about enriching uranium to a hair width away from weapons grade.

Guy, come ******* on.

Nuclear bombs were the cutting-edge technology of 1945. It took the US less than 5 years to build the first one when it had never been done before. No country has taken 30 years between "Hey, we need to get a bomb" and "Well, we got a bomb now!"

The idea that Iran has been incrementally doing this for 30 years is just... absurd.

Israel attacked because they were afraid Witkopf was going to cut a new deal with Iran.

 

[Billiejeens]

Lovers quarrel still going on.

I was wondering what Axelrod thought about it.

Wait -

 

[Billiejeens]

You looking for me?


View attachment 1126374

I hope that's the guy.

 

[pknopp]

Guy, come ******* on.

Nuclear bombs were the cutting-edge technology of 1945. It took the US less than 5 years to build the first one when it had never been done before. No country has taken 30 years between "Hey, we need to get a bomb" and "Well, we got a bomb now!"

The idea that Iran has been incrementally doing this for 30 years is just... absurd.

Israel attacked because they were afraid Witkopf was going to cut a new deal with Iran.

Noted......the first person Israel targeted and killed was the guy Iran had in charge of the negotiations.

 

[Independent thinker]

Guy, come ******* on.

Nuclear bombs were the cutting-edge technology of 1945. It took the US less than 5 years to build the first one when it had never been done before. No country has taken 30 years between "Hey, we need to get a bomb" and "Well, we got a bomb now!"

The idea that Iran has been incrementally doing this for 30 years is just... absurd.

Israel attacked because they were afraid Witkopf was going to cut a new deal with Iran.

It has been proven that over the years they have continued enriching uranium to higher and higher levels, until it reached the point of just a hair width away from weapons grade. That's a fact. Are you a fact denier? What would be the purpose of enriching uranium to higher and higher levels?

 

[Billiejeens]

For what, being a loon?

The thing is, most of the Intel Community would be happy to see her go, so expect them to start sandbagging her as the war ramps up.

The intel community and THE USA do not have the same goals.

 

[JoeB131]

The intel community and THE USA do not have the same goals.

Go out and ask your fellow Americans if they want a war with Iran.

Ask them if they want their sons and daughters coming back in boxes.

I'm guessing most of them would say, no.

The Intel Community and the American People are on the same page here.

The only question is, can TACO turn off Fox News and stop listening to AIPAC long enough to hear common sense.

 

[berg80]

Over 30 years they have gotten closer and closer and are now at the precipice. That's why Israel attacked. They got tired of the world just letting Iran get closer and closer. Even Iran admits and brags about enriching uranium to a hair width away from weapons grade.

What's a regime to do when its own DNI contradicts the narrative it is spinning on Iran? One option would be to acknowledge the distance between the narrative and the IC assessment. Another would be to do what it did. Edit Gabbard's congressional testimony to make it appear the IC is in agreement with the regime on Iran's nuclear program.

Donald Trump insists that Iran is on the brink of developing a nuclear weapon, despite repeated statements to the contrary from his own intelligence officials. But rather than listen, the U.S. president is twisting reality to suit his plans.

The White House posted a video Wednesday of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee in March. Gabbard was delivering the Annual Threat Assessment from the U.S. intelligence community.

“In the past year, we’ve seen an erosion of a decades-long taboo in Iran on discussing nuclear weapons in public, likely emboldening nuclear weapons advocates within Iran’s decision-making apparatus,” Gabbard says in the clip. “Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile is at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons.”

But the clip conveniently leaves out what Gabbard said just a few moments before that soundbite. As shown in Gabbard’s full testimony, the text of which is available on the Office of the Director of National Intelligence website, she actually says Iran is not close to developing a nuclear weapon.
Trump Edits Tulsi Gabbard’s Words to Suit His Iran Policy

 

[Independent thinker]

What's a regime to do when its own DNI contradicts the narrative it is spinning on Iran? One option would be to acknowledge the distance between the narrative and the IC assessment. Another would be to do what it did. Edit Gabbard's congressional testimony to make it appear the IC is in agreement with the regime on Iran's nuclear program.

Donald Trump insists that Iran is on the brink of developing a nuclear weapon, despite repeated statements to the contrary from his own intelligence officials. But rather than listen, the U.S. president is twisting reality to suit his plans.

The White House posted a video Wednesday of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee in March. Gabbard was delivering the Annual Threat Assessment from the U.S. intelligence community.

“In the past year, we’ve seen an erosion of a decades-long taboo in Iran on discussing nuclear weapons in public, likely emboldening nuclear weapons advocates within Iran’s decision-making apparatus,” Gabbard says in the clip. “Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile is at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons.”

But the clip conveniently leaves out what Gabbard said just a few moments before that soundbite. As shown in Gabbard’s full testimony, the text of which is available on the Office of the Director of National Intelligence website, she actually says Iran is not close to developing a nuclear weapon.
Trump Edits Tulsi Gabbard’s Words to Suit His Iran Policy

Iran was on the brink. Pretty much everyone in the world knows it, including the IAEA.

 

[Rawley]

Guy, come ******* on.

Nuclear bombs were the cutting-edge technology of 1945. It took the US less than 5 years to build the first one when it had never been done before. No country has taken 30 years between "Hey, we need to get a bomb" and "Well, we got a bomb now!"

The idea that Iran has been incrementally doing this for 30 years is just... absurd.

Israel attacked because they were afraid Witkopf was going to cut a new deal with Iran.

So the IAEA are Jew loving liars?