Am I now? Weird I think I'm still here.It's on VIDEO!!!!!!
It HAPPENED!!!!!
You are DISMISSED!!!!!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Am I now? Weird I think I'm still here.It's on VIDEO!!!!!!
It HAPPENED!!!!!
You are DISMISSED!!!!!!!
.I did. Starting at min 8 in this "not long" 45 min hot mess
It was a voting rights protest against the corrupt Democrat Party's ballot rigging and voter fraud crimes.
It looks like the Dems/FBI turned it into a riot and they purposely provoked people to enter the capital.
They removed the barriers and open the doors and waved people in, then they charged them with trespassing.
This looks like entrapment.
.Everything Higgins says is spot on and makes sense.
Listlessly you are.Am I now? Weird I think I'm still here.
If by our, you mean progressives, I totally agree.Its the way that they see the world.
Most of our posters.....are not particularly bright people.
Isn't your shift key broken by now?Listlessly you are.
You NARRATIVE IS SHATTERED.
The Capitol Police let protesters INTO the Building.
The Capitol Police ESCORTED buffalo guy INTO the SENATE CHAMBER
The Capitol Police FIRED on crowds outside!
There were HUNDREDS of cosplaying FBI dressed as MAGA inciting violence.
Your FEDSURRECTION REICHSTAG FIRE was A SET UP FRAUD to mask the FRAUD of the STOLEN ELECTION!!!!!!!
Not really. I just know when engaging someone has zero chance of getting something meaningful out of them..
Remember, you're speaking to someone with the attention span of a goldfish.
.
.Not really. I just know when engaging someone has zero chance of getting something meaningful out of them.
I general I find trolling neither interesting or worthwhile, so I quickly stop responding.
No!!!!Isn't your shift key broken by now?
Repeating bunk doesn't all of a sudden grant it validity. It's still... bunk.
And why was that guy sitting in the Speaker’s office with his feet on her desk?You kinda skipped the whole breaking into the Speaker's office, stealing from her, felony civil disorder and disrupting an official proceeding part, dincha? Threatening a police officer with electode spikes in his cane. Or his attempt to prevent the peaceful transition of power.
But hey, you got that photo you love so much. So all's well that ends well!
You mean I'm siding with the actual election results? Shocking, right?
You're siding with seditionists and men who beat police officers to try and overturn a lawful election and retain power for the guy that lost.
All because a game show host told you to. How's that working out for you and Dicky B?
8 Jan 2024 ~~ By Matt Margolis
Tucker Carlson’s Latest Bombshell About January 6 Might Make You Rethink Everything
PJ Media readers already know that the Jan. 6 Capitol riot wasn’t an insurrection, but it’s still absolutely mind-blowing just how much we’ve been lied about the events of that day.
The truth has never stopped the left from pushing the narrative that it wants, between the criminally partisan House Select Committee on Jan. 6 and Joe Biden's annual speeches making insane accusations and debunked mischaracterizations, it's almost a miracle they haven't turned Jan. 6 into a federal holiday akin to Memorial Day. According to the left, it was not only an insurrection, but as many as five Capitol Police officers died that day when there were actually zero.
Why do they continue to push these falsehoods and bogus narratives? For one thing, it's pretty much the only message Biden has (but, sadly for him, it's not working), and it's also an effective fundraising tool. According to a report from The Hill, Biden's campaign raised more than a million dollars following his January 6 anniversary speech.
Is the truth starting to sink in?
But again, we're being sold a huge barrel of lies. In an interview with Tucker Carlson on the new Tucker Carlson Network, Rep. Clay Higgins (R-La.), who has been investigating the Capitol riot, says that there were at least 200 undercover FBI assets embedded in the crowd, inside and outside of the Capitol Building.
“We believe that there were easily 200 FBI undercover assets operating in the crowd outside the Capitol, embedded into groups that entered the Capitol or provoked entry of the Capitol,” Higgins told Carlson. "Given the scope of the operation and the number of doors where entry was allowed or even encouraged — and the number of people that were actually outside the Capitol and that entered — we believe 200 [is a] conservative number."
“It’s shocking what you’re saying and confirms everyone’s worst suspicions about this,” Carlson told Higgins, clearly alarmed by this new information. “It’s clearly true.”
Higgins said that based on the evidence he's reviewed, the FBI worked with local law enforcement, including the Capitol Police. The undercover agents, Higgins said, dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol “because those were the guys that knew their way around the Capitol.”
As Carlson explained in the interview, FBI Director Wray has long refused to answer whether the FBI had assets dressed as Trump supporters at the Capitol that day.
~Snip~
Higgins believes that anti-Trumpers in the FBI orchestrated the entire thing.
“It’s a complex web of FBI assets across the country that can be activated. So, if you have authority at some of the highest levels in the FBI, it doesn’t take much,” Higgins explained.
~Snip~
In other words, according to Higgins, the evidence suggests that the Capitol riot, which has been used as a pretext to incarcerate Trump supporters without trial and to even prevent Trump from being allowed on the ballot in various states, was a set-up.
“I’m following the evidence, and to my horror, it implicates our FBI at the highest level,” Higgins said.
Commentary:
As Carlson explained in the interview, FBI Director Wray has long refused to answer whether the FBI had assets dressed as Trump supporters at the Capitol that day.
One point that Higgins made was that it is highly improbable that civilians would know how to get around the Capitol without help from people who knew where they were going..
Higgins says the evidence points to FBI undercover agents who planted the seeds of a “radical occupation” of the Capitol online before Jan. 6.
“Some of that evidence shockingly reveals that the FBI agents that were operating undercover within the online groups across the country were the first ones to plant the seeds of suggestions of a more radical occupation of the Capitol.”
Like Sullivan’s Insurgence USA? He was posting just that sort of stuff to his followers.
It wasn’t MAGA people he was inciting to go to DC. Sullivan was calling for the people who follow him, leftists or anarchists, to disguise themselves as Trump supporters when they got to DC.
This was a rather ingenious use of violent and non-violent stampeding, go spies, and agent provocateurs, to generate the appearance of aggression from initially peaceful/unarmed protesters who were by stages harassed, led and herded into the wrong place at the wrong time and had to start extricating/defending themselves. the videos I’ve seen speak for themselves.
One point that Higgins made was that it is highly improbable that civilians would know how to get around the Capitol without help from people who knew where they were going.
The government would have never voluntarily told the American people that these armed, undercover DOJ/DEA agents were walking east from the Ellipse area on January 6 during Trump's speech.
8 Jan 2024 ~~ By Matt Margolis
Tucker Carlson’s Latest Bombshell About January 6 Might Make You Rethink Everything
PJ Media readers already know that the Jan. 6 Capitol riot wasn’t an insurrection, but it’s still absolutely mind-blowing just how much we’ve been lied about the events of that day.
The truth has never stopped the left from pushing the narrative that it wants, between the criminally partisan House Select Committee on Jan. 6 and Joe Biden's annual speeches making insane accusations and debunked mischaracterizations, it's almost a miracle they haven't turned Jan. 6 into a federal holiday akin to Memorial Day. According to the left, it was not only an insurrection, but as many as five Capitol Police officers died that day when there were actually zero.
Why do they continue to push these falsehoods and bogus narratives? For one thing, it's pretty much the only message Biden has (but, sadly for him, it's not working), and it's also an effective fundraising tool. According to a report from The Hill, Biden's campaign raised more than a million dollars following his January 6 anniversary speech.
Is the truth starting to sink in?
But again, we're being sold a huge barrel of lies. In an interview with Tucker Carlson on the new Tucker Carlson Network, Rep. Clay Higgins (R-La.), who has been investigating the Capitol riot, says that there were at least 200 undercover FBI assets embedded in the crowd, inside and outside of the Capitol Building.
“We believe that there were easily 200 FBI undercover assets operating in the crowd outside the Capitol, embedded into groups that entered the Capitol or provoked entry of the Capitol,” Higgins told Carlson. "Given the scope of the operation and the number of doors where entry was allowed or even encouraged — and the number of people that were actually outside the Capitol and that entered — we believe 200 [is a] conservative number."
“It’s shocking what you’re saying and confirms everyone’s worst suspicions about this,” Carlson told Higgins, clearly alarmed by this new information. “It’s clearly true.”
Higgins said that based on the evidence he's reviewed, the FBI worked with local law enforcement, including the Capitol Police. The undercover agents, Higgins said, dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol “because those were the guys that knew their way around the Capitol.”
As Carlson explained in the interview, FBI Director Wray has long refused to answer whether the FBI had assets dressed as Trump supporters at the Capitol that day.
~Snip~
Higgins believes that anti-Trumpers in the FBI orchestrated the entire thing.
“It’s a complex web of FBI assets across the country that can be activated. So, if you have authority at some of the highest levels in the FBI, it doesn’t take much,” Higgins explained.
~Snip~
In other words, according to Higgins, the evidence suggests that the Capitol riot, which has been used as a pretext to incarcerate Trump supporters without trial and to even prevent Trump from being allowed on the ballot in various states, was a set-up.
“I’m following the evidence, and to my horror, it implicates our FBI at the highest level,” Higgins said.
Commentary:
As Carlson explained in the interview, FBI Director Wray has long refused to answer whether the FBI had assets dressed as Trump supporters at the Capitol that day.
One point that Higgins made was that it is highly improbable that civilians would know how to get around the Capitol without help from people who knew where they were going..
Higgins says the evidence points to FBI undercover agents who planted the seeds of a “radical occupation” of the Capitol online before Jan. 6.
“Some of that evidence shockingly reveals that the FBI agents that were operating undercover within the online groups across the country were the first ones to plant the seeds of suggestions of a more radical occupation of the Capitol.”
Like Sullivan’s Insurgence USA? He was posting just that sort of stuff to his followers.
It wasn’t MAGA people he was inciting to go to DC. Sullivan was calling for the people who follow him, leftists or anarchists, to disguise themselves as Trump supporters when they got to DC.
This was a rather ingenious use of violent and non-violent stampeding, go spies, and agent provocateurs, to generate the appearance of aggression from initially peaceful/unarmed protesters who were by stages harassed, led and herded into the wrong place at the wrong time and had to start extricating/defending themselves. the videos I’ve seen speak for themselves.
One point that Higgins made was that it is highly improbable that civilians would know how to get around the Capitol without help from people who knew where they were going.
The government would have never voluntarily told the American people that these armed, undercover DOJ/DEA agents were walking east from the Ellipse area on January 6 during Trump's speech.
Ahhhh..... Now we're really getting into storytelling. What a fairy tale.... From one spot in DC you actually think that it would be even remotely possible to affect the vote count in 52 different states.That would be you when you said this; "Insurrections to be actually valid in that category would require some form of attempt to take military action."
No. There's no such requirement. Not in the law, not in the common usage of the word. You made that up.
The ability to overthrow is not a requirement either. Merely the attempt.
So way to knock the stuffing out of that strawman.
Nope. Only those that attacked the capitol while they were actively counting the votes as the last stage of the election.
There's a reason MAGA picked that day to attack the capitol and call for the hanging of Mike Pence.
It wasn't a coincidence. It was an intentional attempt to overturn the election.
lolIt wasn’t MAGA people he was inciting to go to DC. Sullivan was calling for the people who follow him, leftists or anarchists, to disguise themselves as Trump supporters when they got to DC.
It wasn't an insurrection, only DNC operatives will still say it was.And for the thousandth time, they try to downplay the Insurrection.
Pretty much every day. Still.
Lol..... I mean maaaaan..... How gullible do you have to be to buy into this crap?
It wasn’t MAGA people he was inciting to go to DC. Sullivan was calling for the people who follow him, leftists or anarchists, to disguise themselves as Trump supporters when they got to DC.
And why did you guys assault and kill cops if all of that was happening?It was a voting rights protest against the corrupt Democrat Party's ballot rigging and voter fraud crimes.
It looks like the Dems/FBI turned it into a riot and they purposely provoked people to enter the capital.
They removed the barriers and open the doors and waved people in, then they charged them with trespassing.
This looks like entrapment.
There is no downside to making the most outlandish and foolish arguments ever; stating opinion as fact, and communicating the most absurd theories. The powers that be here supposedly don’t moderate on content...until they do.Going on this board most often is a class in how to make bad arguments.
You know what’s not leaking out? The Proud Boys convicted of sedition.As time goes by nobody believes it was an insurrection anymore. Truth leaks out. Government narrative bots, like you will dutifully try to paint it otherwise but it's not working.