Try Googling "Was the assassin's bullet recovered from Charlie Kirk's neck".

MarathonMike

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
60,855
Reaction score
91,057
Points
3,645
Location
The Southwestern Desert
I'm not buying into another "shooter from the grassy knoll" conspiracy BUT.........it is very strange that a google search questioning if the bullet was recovered from Charlie Kirk's body yields ZERO hits. Maybe you will have better luck, and if you do please share what you find. Thanks and Happy New Year!
 
I'm not buying into another "shooter from the grassy knoll" conspiracy BUT.........it is very strange that a google search questioning if the bullet was recovered from Charlie Kirk's body yields ZERO hits. Maybe you will have better luck, and if you do please share what you find. Thanks and Happy New Year!
What would stop a high powered bullet in the neck.....nothing I know
 
I'm not buying into another "shooter from the grassy knoll" conspiracy BUT.........it is very strange that a google search questioning if the bullet was recovered from Charlie Kirk's body yields ZERO hits. Maybe you will have better luck, and if you do please share what you find. Thanks and Happy New Year!
Based on credible reporting and official sources, there is no confirmed public evidence that the assassin’s bullet that struck Charlie Kirk in the neck has been recovered or publicly documented. Here are the key points from verified information:

  • Fatal shot specifics: Charlie Kirk was fatally shot in the neck during an event at Utah Valley University. Authorities recovered a rifle they believe was used in the shooting and bullet casings (some with engraved messages), but news reports do not confirm recovery of the actual projectile that struck him. (euronews)
  • No official confirmation of bullet recovery: Public reporting mentions recovered ammunition casings and the rifle, but no authoritative source (law enforcement, hospital, or official medical examiner) has publicly stated that the bullet was removed from Kirk’s body or found at the scene. A social platform summary (not official) likewise indicated that as of mid-September 2025, the fatal bullet had not been confirmed as recovered. (X (formerly Twitter))
  • Medical details not publicly released: Detailed medical findings—such as whether the bullet was lodged in his body or removed during autopsy—have not been formally published by authorities or in official statements. (MED-TAC International Corp.)
Summary: There is no verified public report confirming that the actual bullet that struck Charlie Kirk’s neck was recovered. What has been reported and confirmed are the recovery of the weapon and related casings, but not recovery of the projectile itself in either public investigative disclosures or official medical releases. (euronews)

If you want, I can provide a concise timeline of the investigation and what specific evidence has been publicly confirmed.

Yet we know from the layout of the site that there was a building behind the pavilion that would have easily caught the bullet in some manner. Wedged into a concrete wall, the floor of the building, the grass behind the pavilion, though the trajectory suggests it when futher back.
 
I'm not buying into another "shooter from the grassy knoll" conspiracy BUT.........it is very strange that a google search questioning if the bullet was recovered from Charlie Kirk's body yields ZERO hits.

Here's what I get:

Shortly after the incident, I got this photo off the web which was supposed to be an x-ray of Kirk showing the bullet in him.


Screen Shot 2025-09-17 at 8.59.15 AM.webp
 
I'm not buying into another "shooter from the grassy knoll" conspiracy BUT.........it is very strange that a google search questioning if the bullet was recovered from Charlie Kirk's body yields ZERO hits. Maybe you will have better luck, and if you do please share what you find. Thanks and Happy New Year!
Yea, no. Don't go down the rathole of Stupid.
 
What would stop a high powered bullet in the neck.....nothing I know

No one can say without an autopsy report. The bullet might have been loaded with less powder than normal, it might have been altered to break apart or tumble once inside the body.

Stranger things have happened--- the bullet might have entered the body, tumbled, hit something and was deflected to the side stopping it from going straight through?

It seems certain that:
  1. Kirk was killed with a rifle.
  2. The bullet did not exit out back of Kirk.
  3. No other shooter has been seen, suggested, nor recorded as a possible suspect.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom