Trump's Stochastic Terrorism

Synthaholic

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
85,708
Reaction score
79,441
Points
3,605
Stochastic terrorism is political violence that has been instigated by hostile public rhetoric that is directed at a group or an individual. Unlike incitement to terrorism, stochastic terrorism is accomplished by using indirect, vague, or coded language that allows the instigator to plausibly disclaim responsibility for the resulting violence.

That's the definition. Trump and Vance are clearly guilty of this.

1726582900496.webp
 
Stochastic terrorism is political violence that has been instigated by hostile public rhetoric that is directed at a group or an individual. Unlike incitement to terrorism, stochastic terrorism is accomplished by using indirect, vague, or coded language that allows the instigator to plausibly disclaim responsibility for the resulting violence.

That's the definition. Trump and Vance are clearly guilty of this.

View attachment 1013646

This was debunked yesterday, dipshit, They were all hoaxes, more likely than not perpetrated by someone like you (or actually you).

In the meantime, how do you like being on Dick Cheney's and Vlad Putin's side in this election? :dance:
 
33 bomb threats. 33 hoaxes. 33 democrat actions. That's the incitement. Meanwhile the Americans of Springfield try to get word to any Americans that might hear.



There used to be a Radio Free Europe and a Radio Free America. We need to resurrect a method to expose what's really happening in towns targeted for destruction.
 
and of course, all the rhetoric from the left fueling assassination attempts on Trump are fake right?

This is a WEIRD position you Republicans have put us in. You are a threat to our democracy. Trying to rig elections. Project 2025. Some crazy shit coming if Trump wins. A president who doesn't care about the laws? Sounds like Putin.

We don't want this. But I think we will beat him at the ballot booth. This Vivek/Nikki supporter was nuts. Told you so. Anyone who likes those two is nuts.
 
This is a WEIRD position you Republicans have put us in. You are a threat to our democracy. Trying to rig elections. Project 2025. Some crazy shit coming if Trump wins. A president who doesn't care about the laws? Sounds like Putin.

We don't want this. But I think we will beat him at the ballot booth. This Vivek/Nikki supporter was nuts. Told you so. Anyone who likes those two is nuts.

You should call in a few more fake bomb threats, Nazi.

 
Stochastic terrorism is political violence that has been instigated by hostile public rhetoric that is directed at a group or an individual. Unlike incitement to terrorism, stochastic terrorism is accomplished by using indirect, vague, or coded language that allows the instigator to plausibly disclaim responsibility for the resulting violence.

That's the definition. Trump and Vance are clearly guilty of this.

View attachment 1013646
OP's (Synthaholic) leftist shill lie of the day, check!

You've done your lying for the day, now **** off.
 
Stochastic terrorism is political violence that has been instigated by hostile public rhetoric that is directed at a group or an individual. Unlike incitement to terrorism, stochastic terrorism is accomplished by using indirect, vague, or coded language that allows the instigator to plausibly disclaim responsibility for the resulting violence.

That's the definition. Trump and Vance are clearly guilty of this.

View attachment 1013646

It's a made up term to suppress speech you don't like under the assumption someone else will do something bad because of it.
 
15th post
All terms are made up, dipshit.

All terms the left uses sure the hell are.

It's a way of trying to silence your opposition by claiming what someone you don't like says may could might maybe will if cause someone to may could would if can do something bad.

It's trying to lower the bar for incitement without actually having to prove incitement.

Par for the course for the weasel left.
 
All terms the left uses sure the hell are.

It's a way of trying to silence your opposition by claiming what someone you don't like says may could might maybe will if cause someone to may could would if can do something bad.

It's trying to lower the bar for incitement without actually having to prove incitement.

Par for the course for the weasel left.
Yes, "The Left" made up the term in 2002 in order to use it against Diaper Donny in 2024.


You really are one stupid ************.
 
Back
Top Bottom