Trump's performance so far?

[AntonToo]

Trump is the final bulwark keeping us from slipping into a full-blown DEPENDENCE on Gov't!

Government spending is a big chunk of the US GDP.

Trump has DOUBLED the deficit in order to artificially juice the GDP. And now he has submitted the biggest government spending budget in human history, with a trillion dollar deficit.

It doesn't get more FULL BLOWN DEPENDENT on government that that, skippy.

Wake the fuck up.

Federal Debt under Obama was 9 trillion for 8 years. Trump coming in under a trillion his first year is a good start, comparatively.

Totally ignorant argument.

Obama had trillion dollar deficts during GREAT RECESSION and it kept going down, Trump's deficits keep going up and he will have trillion dollar deficits in a GOOD economy, 1.5 Trillion dollar deficits if economy so much as hickups.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Progs sure detest the guy, but they're only doing what they're told. From an objective standpoint, is Trump a good or bad POTUS?

Objective: The economy is going great. Jobs are plentiful, the market is good.
Subjective: But he colluded with Russia, I know he did.

Dummy it's NOT AN OBJECTIVE that Trump CAUSED the economy. Between the tax cutting and trade wars his presidency more likely has had right about nuetral effect.

You rightwingers call today's economic growth as "great" but yesterday you were calling just about the same growth under Obama s "disaster".

1% GDP growth is not the same as 3%. Obama was the first and only president in history to not have a year of 3% growth. So he was historically BAD.

 

[TheDude]

So far in only two years.

Economic Policy - A
Jobs - A
Energy Policy - A
Border Security - B (A if he gets the wall)
National Security - B+ N. Korea going well, but needs to get us out of foreign wars

PC killer: A+

 

[The Purge]

I see our ABNORMAL COMMUNISTS are back, interesting how they flock for protection from facts!

 

[AntonToo]

Progs sure detest the guy, but they're only doing what they're told. From an objective standpoint, is Trump a good or bad POTUS?

Objective: The economy is going great. Jobs are plentiful, the market is good.
Subjective: But he colluded with Russia, I know he did.

Dummy it's NOT AN OBJECTIVE that Trump CAUSED the economy. Between the tax cutting and trade wars his presidency more likely has had right about nuetral effect.

You rightwingers call today's economic growth as "great" but yesterday you were calling just about the same growth under Obama s "disaster".

1% GDP growth is not the same as 3%. Obama was the first and only president in history to not have a year of 3% growth. So he was historically BAD.

Ignoramus, why don’t you look shit up before opening your mouth and citing false facts?

Obama best year was 2.9%, and 5.1% best Quarter (annualized). Trump first year was 2.7% and 4.1% best Quarter.

So take your 1% and shove it up your ass, mmmk?

 

[TheDude]

Progs sure detest the guy, but they're only doing what they're told. From an objective standpoint, is Trump a good or bad POTUS?

Objective: The economy is going great. Jobs are plentiful, the market is good.
Subjective: But he colluded with Russia, I know he did.

Dummy it's NOT AN OBJECTIVE that Trump CAUSED the economy. Between the tax cutting and trade wars his presidency more likely has had right about nuetral effect.

You rightwingers call today's economic growth as "great" but yesterday you were calling just about the same growth under Obama s "disaster".

1% GDP growth is not the same as 3%. Obama was the first and only president in history to not have a year of 3% growth. So he was historically BAD.

Ignoramus, why don’t you look shit up before opening your mouth and citing false facts?

Obama best year was 2.9%, and 5.1% best Quarter (annualized). Trump first year was 2.7% and 4.1% best Quarter.

So take your 1% and shove it up your ass, mmmk?

All BS aside, GDP grew at an annual average of 1.5 on O'bummer's watch. Not exactly remarkable. But Obama was say an anomaly as a leader, and Obamacare slowed recovery. If not for historically low interest rates, we never would have experienced a recovery on O'bummer's watch.

As for Trump's watch, it's going to come in at about 2.9 annually. So far anyway.

 

[Claudette]

His performance so far??

Outstanding.