Trumps Lawyers Reply To DOJ Motion With Textbook Definition Of Ridiculous

skews13

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2017
9,482
11,922
2,265
Wednesday evening it was the turn of Trump’s crack legal team, who sent Cannon their reply to the DOJ motion. That reply kept up the tone of past Trump filings by reflecting a state of high dudgeon. But beyond the wailing and chest-thumping over how the DOJ got everything wrong, the Trump response is notable in that it had only two real things to say.

The first was that they simply didn’t have time to explain how the Justice Department statements were incorrect.

The second was a confession.

Actually, the Trump reply begins with an argument that the right of privacy means that a suspect under investigation can’t have their home searched without permission, even if law enforcement has a search warrant, and even if they inform the homeowner in advance. And that anything the government finds that is evidence of a crime can’t be taken, no matter what. So there.


:laugh:
 

:laugh:
The question isn't whether it;s true or not, it's whether Trump can convince his crowds that it's true.

And then when the crowd has been convinced, can Trump convince them to turn to violence.

So far this is straight out of Hitler's playbook.

Conventional lawful methods can't stop the rise of fascism. The crowd's minds are already made up and no logical argument will change their minds.
 
Wednesday evening it was the turn of Trump’s crack legal team, who sent Cannon their reply to the DOJ motion. That reply kept up the tone of past Trump filings by reflecting a state of high dudgeon. But beyond the wailing and chest-thumping over how the DOJ got everything wrong, the Trump response is notable in that it had only two real things to say.

The first was that they simply didn’t have time to explain how the Justice Department statements were incorrect.

The second was a confession.

Actually, the Trump reply begins with an argument that the right of privacy means that a suspect under investigation can’t have their home searched without permission, even if law enforcement has a search warrant, and even if they inform the homeowner in advance. And that anything the government finds that is evidence of a crime can’t be taken, no matter what. So there.


:laugh:
TV tell you that?
 
Wednesday evening it was the turn of Trump’s crack legal team, who sent Cannon their reply to the DOJ motion. That reply kept up the tone of past Trump filings by reflecting a state of high dudgeon. But beyond the wailing and chest-thumping over how the DOJ got everything wrong, the Trump response is notable in that it had only two real things to say.

The first was that they simply didn’t have time to explain how the Justice Department statements were incorrect.

The second was a confession.

Actually, the Trump reply begins with an argument that the right of privacy means that a suspect under investigation can’t have their home searched without permission, even if law enforcement has a search warrant, and even if they inform the homeowner in advance. And that anything the government finds that is evidence of a crime can’t be taken, no matter what. So there.


:laugh:
Wow skews.....you know college football started last night, right? Maybe stop looking at photos of Trump, take your hand out of your pants, and watch some games for a change.....
 
The question isn't whether it;s true or not, it's whether Trump can convince his crowds that it's true.

And then when the crowd has been convinced, can Trump convince them to turn to violence.

So far this is straight out of Hitler's playbook.

Conventional lawful methods can't stop the rise of fascism. The crowd's minds are already made up and no logical argument will change their minds.
Right out of the 2016 playbook . Your a liar .
 
Wednesday evening it was the turn of Trump’s crack legal team, who sent Cannon their reply to the DOJ motion. That reply kept up the tone of past Trump filings by reflecting a state of high dudgeon. But beyond the wailing and chest-thumping over how the DOJ got everything wrong, the Trump response is notable in that it had only two real things to say.

The first was that they simply didn’t have time to explain how the Justice Department statements were incorrect.

The second was a confession.

Actually, the Trump reply begins with an argument that the right of privacy means that a suspect under investigation can’t have their home searched without permission, even if law enforcement has a search warrant, and even if they inform the homeowner in advance. And that anything the government finds that is evidence of a crime can’t be taken, no matter what. So there.


:laugh:
Trump tells his lawyers to "put that in" because as a "stable genius" he knows eveything about everything. And of course his crack legal team does if if they want to get paid. They probably won't either way.

The lawyers look like a bunch of jerkoffs because they're taking orders from the biggest jerkoff in history.
 
Wednesday evening it was the turn of Trump’s crack legal team, who sent Cannon their reply to the DOJ motion. That reply kept up the tone of past Trump filings by reflecting a state of high dudgeon. But beyond the wailing and chest-thumping over how the DOJ got everything wrong, the Trump response is notable in that it had only two real things to say.

The first was that they simply didn’t have time to explain how the Justice Department statements were incorrect.

The second was a confession.

Actually, the Trump reply begins with an argument that the right of privacy means that a suspect under investigation can’t have their home searched without permission, even if law enforcement has a search warrant, and even if they inform the homeowner in advance. And that anything the government finds that is evidence of a crime can’t be taken, no matter what. So there.


:laugh:
I didn't begin with that at all and there was no confession. Your cutting and pasting skills far outpace your critical thinking skills.
 

Forum List

Back
Top