Trump's false narrative about fighting crime. It's a Dictators tactic to get rid of the opposition

Crime? What about President Johnson and Vietnam war, deliberately trying to sink the USS Liberty as an excuse to nuke Egypt; Kennedy assassination cover up; Neo Con Artist Republicans murdering their way through Iraq, conducting the 911 thing, burnings of "heretics" in Waco, Texas, etc. etc.
The USA in alliance with anti-Christ fake Israel and the Super Rich conduct their crimes all around the world.
 

Trump’s DC rhetoric echoes history of racist narratives about urban crime

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has taken control of D.C.’s law enforcement and ordered National Guard troops to deploy onto the streets of the nation’s capital, arguing the extraordinary moves are necessary to curb an urgent public safety crisis.

Even as district officials questioned the claims underlying his emergency declaration, the Republican president promised a “historic action to rescue our nation’s capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.” His rhetoric echoed that used by conservatives going back decades who have denounced cities, especially those with majority non-white populations or led by progressives, as lawless or crime-ridden and in need of outside intervention.

Trump's false narrative about fighting crime is simply and excuse to go after Black Mayors and specifically in Democratic Blue States.

View attachment 1156313
For example, Houston's crime rate has increased by 20% but it is a Red State and the Mayor is white (John Whitmore). Chicago's crime rate has decreased by over 30% but it is a Blue State and its Mayor is Black (Brandon Johnson).

View attachment 1156318

This Trump narrative is not only racist but political. He is using the word "crime" (something that all people relate to and want it to stop) to go after Blue States. He is using lies because he knows that people in general (especially Trump cult members) are not interested in researching facts but in believing the leader they chose.

He doesn't care about combating crime but about preventing the coming elections from turning around against him. He knows his followers will believe, support, and act on his words.

Here is more proof of what this OP is stating:

Trump suggests more cities need National Guard but crime stats tell a different story

Using the National Guard is a military maneuver that is used by Dictators to seize power. That is exactly what Trump is trying to do:

View attachment 1156334
I live in the Chicagoland area. Want me to tell you the truth about crime or are you busy writing more fiction?
 

Trump’s DC rhetoric echoes history of racist narratives about urban crime

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has taken control of D.C.’s law enforcement and ordered National Guard troops to deploy onto the streets of the nation’s capital, arguing the extraordinary moves are necessary to curb an urgent public safety crisis.

Even as district officials questioned the claims underlying his emergency declaration, the Republican president promised a “historic action to rescue our nation’s capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.” His rhetoric echoed that used by conservatives going back decades who have denounced cities, especially those with majority non-white populations or led by progressives, as lawless or crime-ridden and in need of outside intervention.

Trump's false narrative about fighting crime is simply and excuse to go after Black Mayors and specifically in Democratic Blue States.

View attachment 1156313
For example, Houston's crime rate has increased by 20% but it is a Red State and the Mayor is white (John Whitmore). Chicago's crime rate has decreased by over 30% but it is a Blue State and its Mayor is Black (Brandon Johnson).

View attachment 1156318

This Trump narrative is not only racist but political. He is using the word "crime" (something that all people relate to and want it to stop) to go after Blue States. He is using lies because he knows that people in general (especially Trump cult members) are not interested in researching facts but in believing the leader they chose.

He doesn't care about combating crime but about preventing the coming elections from turning around against him. He knows his followers will believe, support, and act on his words.

Here is more proof of what this OP is stating:

Trump suggests more cities need National Guard but crime stats tell a different story

Using the National Guard is a military maneuver that is used by Dictators to seize power. That is exactly what Trump is trying to do:

View attachment 1156334
Who is this opposition that he is getting rid of
 

Trump’s DC rhetoric echoes history of racist narratives about urban crime

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has taken control of D.C.’s law enforcement and ordered National Guard troops to deploy onto the streets of the nation’s capital, arguing the extraordinary moves are necessary to curb an urgent public safety crisis.

Even as district officials questioned the claims underlying his emergency declaration, the Republican president promised a “historic action to rescue our nation’s capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.” His rhetoric echoed that used by conservatives going back decades who have denounced cities, especially those with majority non-white populations or led by progressives, as lawless or crime-ridden and in need of outside intervention.

Trump's false narrative about fighting crime is simply and excuse to go after Black Mayors and specifically in Democratic Blue States.

View attachment 1156313
For example, Houston's crime rate has increased by 20% but it is a Red State and the Mayor is white (John Whitmore). Chicago's crime rate has decreased by over 30% but it is a Blue State and its Mayor is Black (Brandon Johnson).

View attachment 1156318

This Trump narrative is not only racist but political. He is using the word "crime" (something that all people relate to and want it to stop) to go after Blue States. He is using lies because he knows that people in general (especially Trump cult members) are not interested in researching facts but in believing the leader they chose.

He doesn't care about combating crime but about preventing the coming elections from turning around against him. He knows his followers will believe, support, and act on his words.

Here is more proof of what this OP is stating:

Trump suggests more cities need National Guard but crime stats tell a different story

Using the National Guard is a military maneuver that is used by Dictators to seize power. That is exactly what Trump is trying to do:

View attachment 1156334
According to your graph, murders in Houston are up

Trump’s DC rhetoric echoes history of racist narratives about urban crime

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has taken control of D.C.’s law enforcement and ordered National Guard troops to deploy onto the streets of the nation’s capital, arguing the extraordinary moves are necessary to curb an urgent public safety crisis.

Even as district officials questioned the claims underlying his emergency declaration, the Republican president promised a “historic action to rescue our nation’s capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.” His rhetoric echoed that used by conservatives going back decades who have denounced cities, especially those with majority non-white populations or led by progressives, as lawless or crime-ridden and in need of outside intervention.

Trump's false narrative about fighting crime is simply and excuse to go after Black Mayors and specifically in Democratic Blue States.

View attachment 1156313
For example, Houston's crime rate has increased by 20% but it is a Red State and the Mayor is white (John Whitmore). Chicago's crime rate has decreased by over 30% but it is a Blue State and its Mayor is Black (Brandon Johnson).

View attachment 1156318

This Trump narrative is not only racist but political. He is using the word "crime" (something that all people relate to and want it to stop) to go after Blue States. He is using lies because he knows that people in general (especially Trump cult members) are not interested in researching facts but in believing the leader they chose.

He doesn't care about combating crime but about preventing the coming elections from turning around against him. He knows his followers will believe, support, and act on his words.

Here is more proof of what this OP is stating:

Trump suggests more cities need National Guard but crime stats tell a different story

Using the National Guard is a military maneuver that is used by Dictators to seize power. That is exactly what Trump is trying to do:

View attachment 1156334
Houston is up in violent crimes? You have proof because all you have is homicides.

Why do you try to mislead all the time?
 
According to your graph, murders in Houston are up

Houston is up in violent crimes? You have proof because all you have is homicides.

Why do you try to mislead all the time?
Are you saying that Trump has been LYING about crime being up and him fighting it?
 
I am saying you are lying about Houston, and so your example is based on a lie as usual.
That is not what the Houston Chronicle is saying:

1758733561883.webp

Houston Chronicle

Houston seeing rise in homicides in 2025, records show
 
Watch my interviews of people on the street in Chicago and tell me if crime is down. People are afraid to go outside in every non white neighborhood.
Like I said in the OP, it is Trump that has stimulated hate for the opposite party since day 1 of his presidencies, so you should not be surprised that hate is returned.
 
Like I said in the OP, it is Trump that has stimulated hate for the opposite party since day 1 of his presidencies, so you should not be surprised that hate is returned.
And its so sad that we have been politically conditioned to Hate our neighbors,
Only because they favor positions that are feed through propaganda.
Instead of working together for balance of power.
 
For May? Not even a half a year in? lol! You also stated violent crimes were up 20% as well, both are not correct by latest stats but you know that, but it doesn’t serve your agenda.
I proved your statement false. Crime is up in Houston this year. Your post does not prove the information wrong.
 
I proved your statement false. Crime is up in Houston this year. Your post does not prove the information wrong.
No you haven’t because this is way more current that your crap and it is the opposite of your BS, you just did not use the most updated stats because it proved you wrong again.


Murders down by -7.8%. Violent crime is down by -16.6% and violent wasn’t up over 20% at anytime during the year. Murder in March was up 20% but violent crimes were was not up, but you knew that, but it didn’t fit your spin.

So you are wrong, you even tried to double down on your lies. I am trying to figure out if you are just sloppy or dishonest. Maybe you can tell us all. Apology accepted.
 
No you haven’t because this is way more current that your crap and it is the opposite of your BS, you just did not use the most updated stats because it proved you wrong again.


Murders down by -7.8%. Violent crime is down by -16.6% and violent wasn’t up over 20% at anytime during the year. Murder in March was up 20% but violent crimes were was not up, but you knew that, but it didn’t fit your spin.

So you are wrong, you even tried to double down on your lies. I am trying to figure out if you are just sloppy or dishonest. Maybe you can tell us all. Apology accepted.
Thanks for the link as I always appreciate data, statistics and facts and in this link it does seem you provided it.

Having said that, the information I provided was not personal experience but quoting data from the sources that were providing it. As such, both of us need to be contacting and debating the sources and not calling each other right or wrong (liar or truth supplier) because we have both quoted those services.

Which one of those sources are correct? Difficult to know because when politics are involved, lies are what is often given and as such, neither you nor I will be able to confirm which sources is correct
 
Thanks for the link as I always appreciate data, statistics and facts and in this link it does seem you provided it.

Having said that, the information I provided was not personal experience but quoting data from the sources that were providing it. As such, both of us need to be contacting and debating the sources and not calling each other right or wrong (liar or truth supplier) because we have both quoted those services.

Which one of those sources are correct? Difficult to know because when politics are involved, lies are what is often given and as such, neither you nor I will be able to confirm which sources is correct
That is a great theory, sadly, you burnt that bridge with me long ago.
 
15th post
That is a great theory, sadly, you burnt that bridge with me long ago.
You certainly are entitled to your opinion. As far as bridges are concerned, I feel the same way about you.

Oh, and by the way. The fact is that I actually gave you credit for supplying data, statistics and facts in my last post.

You have never done the same for me, even though I always supply links to data, statistics and facts. It is a one-way street for you.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom