So guilty until proven innocent is the new motto for American Justice.
Trump does not have to provide the public any evidence of anything at any time because it is none of your business.
But even if he did and there is no cosigner you will never accept it because you already believe he is a Manchurian Candidate for Putin, so no point of him trying to prove his innocence to those that have convicted him in public opinion...
Now where is your evidence to support your opinion that he has a cosigner and why did MSNBC back down quickly while tossing O'Donnell under the bus?
Innocent until proven guilty is in court not the public.
We have a person in a position that should know, that Trump's loans were cosigned by Russians.
Until this is verified, we do not know the truth.
Yet here you sare defending your fat assed orange buddy. Having a freakin fit. Yet you do not know shit about it.
You seem to think it is wrong that Trump would even need a cosigner. Finny chit coming from a pretend expert on bank loans.
We have a story.
Trump can ignore it or he can clear it up.
Meanwhile we all get to decide whether to believe it or not.
You think it is false based on Trump's reputation as an honest person and great businessman.
I think it could be true based on Trump's reputation as a lying **** who would accept a cosign from Russians & lie about it on government forms.
I wonder, who's view of Trump is most likely accurate?