Trump's answer upon hearing the totalitarian Mullahcracy steps up executions of young women

[Alweysrite!]

The restrictions on women in society l. Women were designed to follow and serve, not to lead. Our century long delusion otherwise has severely harmed our society.

You must be in Afghanistan

 

[Alweysrite!]

I don’t think I suggested we had. I most definitely suggested we should, as we should take on many of the other Iranian policies towards women in general.

You are out of your mind

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I presume Pope Leo will ignore this reference.

REPORTER: Iran is going to execute four more protesters, including the first woman protester. What do you tell Iran?

TRUMP: Tell that to the Pope. pic.twitter.com/K3jTlaMVX0— Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) April 16, 2026

Really shows what a pile of shit he is.

 

[Alweysrite!]

Really shows what a pile of shit he is.

You constantly show what a real pile of shit you are

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You constantly show what a real pile of shit you are

Criticize their Rape God, and the cultists attack... reflexively... ^^

 

[Alweysrite!]

Criticize their Rape God, and the cultists attack... reflexively... ^^

Sounds like you need to go back to your sacrifices and bloodletting, heathen.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Sounds like you need to go back to your sacrifices and bloodletting, heathen.

Oh my, low IQ cultist said mean things, because he is having a tantrum for Daddy. Oh no.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I see we have a new bait and report troll.

 

[struth]

Really shows what a pile of shit he is.

Personally, I think the execution of women is shitty

But not surprised to see you deflect to Trump and ignore what your pals in Iran are doing tk their own people

 

[struth]

Criticize their Rape God, and the cultists attack... reflexively... ^^

Speaking of rape, you defend your pals executing teenage rape victims for being raped

Zeinab was a teenage victim of domestic violence, Iran executed her

It’s a scenario that is all too familiar to many women and girls. But because Sekaanvand lived in Iran, her story took an even darker turn.

www.amnesty.org

You protect those animals

 

[Alweysrite!]

Oh my, low IQ cultist said mean things, because he is having a tantrum for Daddy. Oh no.

I'm pretty sure my cult is definitely better and more intelligent than your Cult. Your constant bitching and moaning accomplishes nothing.

 

[Anathema]

I bet you're a very lonely guy, none of that is true at all.

Not at all. I can’t get a minute of quiet in my own home. Mostly because of female drama of one sort or another.

All of it is true; it just doesn’t fit the narrative you woke fuckers prefer.,

Just curious, what planet do you live on?

Earth, unfortunately.

You must be in Afghanistan

Nope. Massachusetts; though it looks more and more like Afghanistan every year.

You are out of your mind

Actuallybinhavectge mental health paperwork that says otherwise. Unstable but not insane.

 

[OldFlame]

Not at all. I can’t get a minute of quiet in my own home. Mostly because of female drama of one sort or another.

All of it is true; it just doesn’t fit the narrative you woke fuckers prefer.,

Earth, unfortunately.

Nope. Massachusetts; though it looks more and more like Afghanistan every year.

Actuallybinhavectge mental health paperwork that says otherwise. Unstable but not insane.

Do the females in your home realize that you have no respect for them and believe them to be intellectually inferior?

 

[Alweysrite!]

Not at all. I can’t get a minute of quiet in my own home. Mostly because of female drama of one sort or another.

All of it is true; it just doesn’t fit the narrative you woke fuckers prefer.,

Earth, unfortunately.

Nope. Massachusetts; though it looks more and more like Afghanistan every year.

Actuallybinhavectge mental health paperwork that says otherwise. Unstable but not insane.

You are definitely a nut job. Luckily you take a very minority position for our country. Now go keep your women in order

 

[Doc7505]

If we are supposedly NOT interested in regime change, then their treatment of women is a non-issue so far as I’m concerned.

If we ARE interested in changing the political atmosphere of Iran then I’ll say that I believe Iran treats women far more appropriately (not nicely) than we treat our women here in the west.

<~~~~~~~~~~>
Iran’s appointment as vice-chair of the UN Commission for Social Development has sparked global outrage due to its ongoing repression of women and human rights violations.
Criticism of Iran's Human Rights Record
Despite its new role, Iran's history regarding women's rights is deeply troubling. The country has been criticized for:

• Systematic oppression of women: Laws and policies in Iran have long restricted women's rights in various areas, including marriage, divorce, and employment.
• Gender-based violence: The Iranian government has failed to protect women from violence and discrimination, leading to claims of a gender apartheid system.
• Poor global rankings: Iran ranks poorly in global gender equality indices, indicating a significant gap in women's rights compared to other nations.

When do we start executing women for not wearing hijab or burka?
Iran is set to execute its first female protester, Bita Hemmati, in connection with the anti-regime demonstrations that began in January 2026. She is among an estimated 1,600 individuals sentenced to death by the Iranian government in the past year.


Read more:

Execution of 1,050 People and Crackdown on 30,000 Women for Not Wearing the Hijab - Iran Focus

According to human rights sources, the Iranian regime executed at least 1,050 people in the Persian Calendar year 1403 (March 21, 2024 to March 21, 2025). Additionally, over 30,000 women faced punitive measures for not adhering to the regime’s mandatory hijab rules. During this period, at least...

iranfocus.com

xxxxxxxxxx​

Jayran Zaheri Hanged in Isfahan Prison; 14 Women Executed in Two Months

At dawn on Monday, September 29, 2025, Jayran Zaheri, a female prisoner was hanged along with three men in the

wncri.org

 

[Doc7505]

Assassinating diplomats and leaders not involved in a battle has long been against international norms for centuries.

When Israel bombed and killed folks involved in diplomacy, that made this argument irrelevant & a joke.

<~~~~~~~~~~>
The long-standing prohibition against the assassination of diplomats and leaders not involved in battle is rooted in the principles of state sovereignty established centuries ago. However, recent actions by states indicate a troubling trend towards the erosion of these norms, challenging the framework that has historically governed international relations.
During WWII, there were notable assassination attempts on the leaders of both sides. The Nazis plotted to assassinate Allied leaders like Franklin D. Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, and Joseph Stalin, while there were also multiple attempts to kill Adolf Hitler by German military officials and conspirators.

 

[Alweysrite!]

I do too.

The point here, is it is their nation, their laws, and their sovereignty. Using as an excuse that we don't like how they run their nation as an excuse for war is just as much bullshit.

Far more innocents would die in a war than we believe are being unjustly put to death. Governments, no matter where, don't really care about people, they just use them as an excuse to act more authoritarian.



If folks take this to its logical conclusion, then the entire planet could declare war on America for our allowing citizens to be armed.
Only a handful of other nations allow their citizens to own guns, and the hurdle for them to be armed is much higher than it is here.

I'm willing to bet far more people die of gun violence than Iran has killed by being oppressive, I have no doubt. But our nation has made the decision that an armed population is the only security of liberty. Their nation has decided that an oppressive theocracy is the only guarantee of public morality.

You're turning a blind eye to human rights violations is really quite disturbing. I think you should really shut up while you're ahead.

 

[MisterBeale]

You're turning a blind eye to human rights violations is really quite disturbing. I think you should really shut up while you're ahead.

So you honestly do think we could effect regime change while killing less than that few hundred innocents that the regime already slaughtered?

 

[Alweysrite!]

So you honestly do think we could effect regime change while killing less than that few hundred innocents that the regime already slaughtered?



View attachment 1246422

I was talking about your turning a blind eye to human rights violations dumbass. It's despicable

 

[Anathema]

<~~~~~~~~~~>
Iran’s appointment as vice-chair of the UN Commission for Social Development has sparked global outrage due to its ongoing repression of women and human rights violations.
Criticism of Iran's Human Rights Record
Despite its new role, Iran's history regarding women's rights is deeply troubling. The country has been criticized for:

• Systematic oppression of women: Laws and policies in Iran have long restricted women's rights in various areas, including marriage, divorce, and employment.
• Gender-based violence: The Iranian government has failed to protect women from violence and discrimination, leading to claims of a gender apartheid system.
• Poor global rankings: Iran ranks poorly in global gender equality indices, indicating a significant gap in women's rights compared to other nations.

When do we start executing women for not wearing hijab or burka?
Iran is set to execute its first female protester, Bita Hemmati, in connection with the anti-regime demonstrations that began in January 2026. She is among an estimated 1,600 individuals sentenced to death by the Iranian government in the past year.

Obviously we have differences on what a himan is and how they should be treated. I don’t consider women to be anywhere near of equal value to men. I never have and never will. I’m not a fan of the hijab or Gurkha, but I have no issue with a government demanding them or any other form of dress for their citizens.