The Stolen Election - The Evidence
On television and in the movies, circumstantial evidence is usually 'blown off' as near nothing. While direct evidence is portrayed as damning. Inference is the key as circumstantial evidence relies on inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. In effect, circumstantial evidence allows for more than one interpretation and explanation of fact. All forensic evidence supplied on testimony by an expert witness is usually treated as circumstantial evidence.
Cases Won on Circumstantial Evidence
It requires the totality of circumstances to construct an inference, not the obviousness of the conclusion to establish circumstantial evidence. So, the majority of those convicted have been by a majority if not entirely by circumstantial evidence. Guilt or innocence is established by circumstantial evidence through reasoning. In most cases those who commit criminal acts tend to avoid conditions that would provide direct evidence. Criminal activities are generally done in secret, not openly. In the submission of circumstantial evidence, it depends on the attorney of either side to weave various bits and pieces into an understandable whole, or if defending to punch holes into the logical inference. If reasoning is the rational for establishing circumstantial evidence it is logical to expect reasoning to be used to refute it as well.
The totality of circumstances regarding the 2020 Election construct an inference that there was overwhelming fraud, and through reasoning, in a court of law, a prosecutor could convince a jury that the election was stolen.
Throughout this page I will post various evidence, videos, documentaries, etc. Some are supportive, and some could prove all by themselves that the election was stolen. The totality of circumstantial evidence will allow us to come to the reasonable conclusion that the election was stolen.
1. The Documentary 2000 Mules
Website: 2000 Mules | Official Site
- "Highly respected Dinesh D'Souza, working together with Catherine Engelbrecht of True the Vote, just released a trailer to their new movie, "2,000 Mules," that shows the world exactly how the 2020 Presidential Election was Rigged and Stolen. The movie exposes the lies of the Democrats, RINOs, and Fake News who say it was the "most secure election in history." It was, perhaps, the least secure in history. The ballot box was stuffed, and stuffed like never beforeâ€”and it's all on video. Ballots were trafficked and sold in a massive operation in each Swing State. The evidence is so damning, what will the cowards who sat and did nothing about the stolen election say now? The way our votes were taken away is a disgrace to our Nation. It must be fixed" - Donald J. Trump
Using verified tracking technology, people carrying fake ballots were tracked leaving Democrat offices and going to ballot drop-off boxes to stuff them. The evidence is damning. According to Rasmussen Reports, the documentary, which investigates evidence of widespread cheating in the 2020 presidential election, is hitting home with voters who have seen the film. As of June 03, 2022, a Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey found that 77% of those Likely U.S. voters who have seen "2000 Mules" say the movie strengthened their conviction that there was systematic and widespread election fraud in the 2020 election. Only 19% of those who have seen the documentary say their belief in election fraud was weakened. As of June 03, 2022, only 15% of voters had seen "2000 Mules." Nineteen percent (19%) of Republicans, 14% of Democrats and 11% of voters not affiliated with either major party report having watched "2000 Mules." Awareness of the new documentary was much more widespread, with 41% of voters saying they've heard about "2000 Mules." That includes 50% of Republicans, 36% of Democrats and 38% of unaffiliated voters.
2. Pennsylvania court: Secretary of state lacked authority to change deadline 2 days before Election Day
Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar violated the law and allowed proof of identification for mail in ballots to be provided up until Nov. 12. State law said that voters have until six days after the election, which was Nov. 9. to cure problems regarding a lack of proof of identification. Had the law been followed, Trump would have won, and many illegitimate ballots would not have been counted as legitimate. Pennsylvania's court decided that the Secretary of state lacked authority to change deadline 2 days before Election Day. Furthermore, Trump expected the action from the Supreme Court regarding whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court acted properly in granting the three-day extension for accepting mail-in ballots, and SCOTUS dropped the ball, not for the first or last time. This is one of those evidences which alone prove that Donald Trump was actually elected president.
3. Conflicting Data
The claim is that Biden won 81+m votes, but despite this they lost house seats in the bluest of areas like New York and California. How could the biggest win in history not affect the down ballot races and not translate anywhere close to Biden's votes?
Trump won African-American majority counties 9% to Biden's 8%, he won Hispanic-majority counties by 39% to Biden's 19%, and Trump set GOP records with minority voters not seen since the 1960's. How are these things possible with Bidens massive win?
Trump INCREASED his votes between elections, by over 10.5m, which is second or third historically, and that almost never happens. Obama lost close to 4-5 million and was re-elected.
How did Biden win the most amount of votes ever on record, yet win the election with the fewest amount of counties won, also a record?
How did Trump lose the election, while carrying 99% of all Bellwether counties by an average of a 16-point margin? That many Bellwether counties being wrong on an election outcome is a statistical anomaly not ever seen on record.
Referring to the beginning of this page, the totality of this evidence is reaching a point where we can make a reasonable inference.
That is the basis plus the first three points. The website makes seven points, depending on how you divide it up. Suffice to say that is can no longer be reasonably said that Biden got the votes they claimed he got. Its just not possible. To say that Biden one is to spit on basic math.