Trump wins Michigan

[JakeStarkey]

They'll find boxes of ballots in the trunks of cars. Happened in Minnesota. That's what put Al Frankenstein in the Senate.

With Dems, those ballots just appear out of nowhere!

They did it in California. They changed regular voters to mail in on Election Day. That means their votes weren't counted and boxed up. They can then be swapped out with fraudulent ones and no one would ever know. Those mail in votes aren't counted until later. That's how Hillary's vote count keeps going up. Dems are masters of voter fraud.

Poor Democraps, even with all the election fraud, criminal behavior, and rigging they normally do every cycle, they still couldn't get Hillary in.

The only was done by the Trumpkens, and Hillary still got more votes than any white man ever for president.

 

[Care4all]

i don't see how this recount would help....the electronic voting machine districts, average having hillary getting 7% less in votes than ALL other voting districts with paper trail votes...

the electronic voting machines with no paper trail is what needs examining by computer scientists that can audit them....? ARE THEY GOING TO DO THAT??

 

[JakeStarkey]

I'm curious. There's all sorts of noise about a 3rd party candidate paying for recounts in three major states. This report is the FINAL result of an automatic recount due to the closeness of the result. How can she call (pay for) another recount? Isn't this a FINAL result?

Stein is calling for a hand count of the paper ballots to double check the electronic results.

It will not be granted, even CNN "experts" which are all Hillary shills have opined that those who are calling for it are on dope or other hallucinogenic drugs.

Won't be granted? On what grounds? The rules are, as long as a candidate asks for it, and is willing to pay the fees for it, and they meet the deadline to file for it... they can.

Won't be granted because A- there has to be evidence of "hacking" or "rigging" and B- the vote isn't close enough for the auto recall. C- you can't force an hand count of votes of four states costing in the tens of millions of dollars just because you lost. You lose.

You can keep lying and we can keep laughing at you.

 

[2aguy]

If you check Stein's bank account....like Bernie....you will see a nice big check from the hilary foundation....and she will also be buying a nice new house......

 

[2aguy]

They'll find boxes of ballots in the trunks of cars. Happened in Minnesota. That's what put Al Frankenstein in the Senate.

With Dems, those ballots just appear out of nowhere!

They did it in California. They changed regular voters to mail in on Election Day. That means their votes weren't counted and boxed up. They can then be swapped out with fraudulent ones and no one would ever know. Those mail in votes aren't counted until later. That's how Hillary's vote count keeps going up. Dems are masters of voter fraud.

Poor Democraps, even with all the election fraud, criminal behavior, and rigging they normally do every cycle, they still couldn't get Hillary in.

Like al gore...hilary is a democrat who can't even steal an easy election........

 

[JakeStarkey]

i don't see how this recount would help....the electronic voting machine districts, average having hillary getting 7% less in votes than ALL other voting districts with paper trail votes...

the electronic voting machines with no paper trail is what needs examining by computer scientists that can audit them....? ARE THEY GOING TO DO THAT??

Yup, and that is why the Trumpkins are screaming.

 

[JakeStarkey]

They'll find boxes of ballots in the trunks of cars. Happened in Minnesota. That's what put Al Frankenstein in the Senate.

With Dems, those ballots just appear out of nowhere!

They did it in California. They changed regular voters to mail in on Election Day. That means their votes weren't counted and boxed up. They can then be swapped out with fraudulent ones and no one would ever know. Those mail in votes aren't counted until later. That's how Hillary's vote count keeps going up. Dems are masters of voter fraud.

Poor Democraps, even with all the election fraud, criminal behavior, and rigging they normally do every cycle, they still couldn't get Hillary in.

Like al gore...hilary is a democrat who can't even steal an easy election........

Trump showed us all how to rig an election. Rig the computer-driven voting machines.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

They'll find boxes of ballots in the trunks of cars. Happened in Minnesota. That's what put Al Frankenstein in the Senate.

With Dems, those ballots just appear out of nowhere!

They did it in California. They changed regular voters to mail in on Election Day. That means their votes weren't counted and boxed up. They can then be swapped out with fraudulent ones and no one would ever know. Those mail in votes aren't counted until later. That's how Hillary's vote count keeps going up. Dems are masters of voter fraud.

Poor Democraps, even with all the election fraud, criminal behavior, and rigging they normally do every cycle, they still couldn't get Hillary in.

Like al gore...hilary is a democrat who can't even steal an easy election........

Trump showed us all how to rig an election. Rig the computer-driven voting machines.

"Rig the computer-driven voting machines."

Michigan doesn't use such computer driven voting machines.

Michigan elections official casts doubt on vote-hacking concerns

"Chris Thomas, the director of Michigan's Bureau of Elections, said Michigan doesn't use the electronic voting machines identified in the report as being the sources of potential hacking."

"We are an entire paper and optical scan state," Thomas told the on Wednesday. "Nothing is connected to the Internet."

Michigan elections official casts doubt on vote-hacking concerns

Michigan election director: No election hack evidence

Michigan election director: No election hack evidence

Leftists a few days before the election, lead by Obama said election rigging was a Conspiracy....until Hillary lost the election, now it's not a Conspiracy?

Obama: Trump's rigged election claim 'whining before the game's even over'

"President Barack Obama on Tuesday cast Donald Trump's claims of a rigged election as potentially corrosive to American democracy, insisting that the Republican presidential nominee was griping about an invented conspiracy."

Obama: Trump's rigged election claim 'whining before the games even over' - CNNPolitics.com

 

[ninja007]

Why is Jill Stein only asking for recounts in states that Trump won? Hillary won New Hampshire, Minnesota & Nevada by FEWER votes than Trump won Pennsylvania, but there will be no recount there.


Paul Joseph Watson | Facebook

 

[Roudy]

I'm curious. There's all sorts of noise about a 3rd party candidate paying for recounts in three major states. This report is the FINAL result of an automatic recount due to the closeness of the result. How can she call (pay for) another recount? Isn't this a FINAL result?

Stein is calling for a hand count of the paper ballots to double check the electronic results.

It will not be granted, even CNN "experts" which are all Hillary shills have opined that those who are calling for it are on dope or other hallucinogenic drugs.

Won't be granted? On what grounds? The rules are, as long as a candidate asks for it, and is willing to pay the fees for it, and they meet the deadline to file for it... they can.

Won't be granted because A- there has to be evidence of "hacking" or "rigging" and B- the vote isn't close enough for the auto recall. C- you can't force an hand count of votes of four states costing in the tens of millions of dollars bpjust because you lost.

You lose.

Well what a fail post. A, there doesn't have to be beforehand evidence in order to call for a hand count of the paper ballots, it's one of the provisions associated with using computer voting. B, this isn't an auto recall. And C... the candidates are the ones that have to pay for the recount.

Why are you on here posting shit about something and you don't even know the VERY basic parts of the argument?

Of course there has to be a legitimate legal reason why a vote that has been verified and certified by election officials and observers, should be recounted! They would have to show solid evidence of that the integrity of a vote has been corrupted to the point that it could change the outcome (no such evidence exists) or, the vote is simply to close, which is t the case either. You're shit outta luck. Say hello to president Trump.

 

[Roudy]

Why is Jill Stein only asking for recounts in states that Trump won? Hillary won New Hampshire, Minnesota & Nevada by FEWER votes than Trump won Pennsylvania, but there will be no recount there.


Paul Joseph Watson | Facebook

Because Hillary can't do this herself for a variety of reasons, she's hired Jill Stein. The crooked corrupt Clinton's are very good at this Mafia stuff , wheeling and dealing and quid pro quo arrangements like the one they did in the back of the plane with Attorney General Lynch.

 

[Roudy]

They'll find boxes of ballots in the trunks of cars. Happened in Minnesota. That's what put Al Frankenstein in the Senate.

With Dems, those ballots just appear out of nowhere!

They did it in California. They changed regular voters to mail in on Election Day. That means their votes weren't counted and boxed up. They can then be swapped out with fraudulent ones and no one would ever know. Those mail in votes aren't counted until later. That's how Hillary's vote count keeps going up. Dems are masters of voter fraud.

Poor Democraps, even with all the election fraud, criminal behavior, and rigging they normally do every cycle, they still couldn't get Hillary in.

The only was done by the Trumpkens, and Hillary still got more votes than any white man ever for president.

Yeah it's always the Democraos committing voter fraud, have you noticed? They can't play by the rules. The rules are it's an electoral college system, not popular, and Trump won.

 

[EverCurious]

I thought Stein was just asking for a recount to see if she'd crossed the 5% threshold that gives them $10k and a spot on the ballot. Maybe I'm wrong.

Alaska gave our Libertarian Party candidate 6% this year so he's thrilled. Veteran's Party sadly got less than 2% - their campaign up here was far too word of mouth due to money issues.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Stein is calling for a hand count of the paper ballots to double check the electronic results.

It will not be granted, even CNN "experts" which are all Hillary shills have opined that those who are calling for it are on dope or other hallucinogenic drugs.

Won't be granted? On what grounds? The rules are, as long as a candidate asks for it, and is willing to pay the fees for it, and they meet the deadline to file for it... they can.

Won't be granted because A- there has to be evidence of "hacking" or "rigging" and B- the vote isn't close enough for the auto recall. C- you can't force an hand count of votes of four states costing in the tens of millions of dollars bpjust because you lost.

You lose.

Well what a fail post. A, there doesn't have to be beforehand evidence in order to call for a hand count of the paper ballots, it's one of the provisions associated with using computer voting. B, this isn't an auto recall. And C... the candidates are the ones that have to pay for the recount.

Why are you on here posting shit about something and you don't even know the VERY basic parts of the argument?

Of course there has to be a legitimate legal reason why a vote that has been verified and certified by election officials and observers, should be recounted! They would have to show solid evidence of that the integrity of a vote has been corrupted to the point that it could change the outcome (no such evidence exists) or, the vote is simply to close, which is t the case either. You're shit outta luck. Say hello to president Trump.

Your opinion is not supported by the facts. Sux to be you.

 

[JimBowie1958]

They'll find boxes of ballots in the trunks of cars. Happened in Minnesota. That's what put Al Frankenstein in the Senate.

With Dems, those ballots just appear out of nowhere!

It's not the ballots; its the magical trunks that are the issue here.

 

[Roudy]

It will not be granted, even CNN "experts" which are all Hillary shills have opined that those who are calling for it are on dope or other hallucinogenic drugs.

Won't be granted? On what grounds? The rules are, as long as a candidate asks for it, and is willing to pay the fees for it, and they meet the deadline to file for it... they can.

Won't be granted because A- there has to be evidence of "hacking" or "rigging" and B- the vote isn't close enough for the auto recall. C- you can't force an hand count of votes of four states costing in the tens of millions of dollars bpjust because you lost.

You lose.

Well what a fail post. A, there doesn't have to be beforehand evidence in order to call for a hand count of the paper ballots, it's one of the provisions associated with using computer voting. B, this isn't an auto recall. And C... the candidates are the ones that have to pay for the recount.

Why are you on here posting shit about something and you don't even know the VERY basic parts of the argument?

Of course there has to be a legitimate legal reason why a vote that has been verified and certified by election officials and observers, should be recounted! They would have to show solid evidence of that the integrity of a vote has been corrupted to the point that it could change the outcome (no such evidence exists) or, the vote is simply to close, which is t the case either. You're shit outta luck. Say hello to president Trump.

Your opinion is not supported by the facts. Sux to be you.

Well then, why don't you show us the facts? What does it take to recount an election result that has been certified by election officials of that state?

Do you really think claiming (whining) that "certain computer scientists have found that the results defy past computer stats on voter behavior" is considered a legitimate probable cause to investigate an election process who's integrity has been observed and verified at every stage by sworn election officials of that state? Ha ha ha.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Jill Stein will call for a recount, and it will be granted.

She will call for recounts in WI and PA as well.

She better hurry, If there is going to be a challenge, they better get to it, Wisconsin’s deadline is Friday; Pennsylvania’s is Monday and Michigan’s is Wednesday, Nov. 30.

 

[Lewdog]

Jill Stein will call for a recount, and it will be granted.

She will call for recounts in WI and PA as well.

She better hurry, If there is going to be a challenge, they better get to it, Wisconsin’s deadline is Friday; Pennsylvania’s is Monday and Michigan’s is Wednesday, Nov. 30.

They've already raise enough for paying the initial costs, but they also said they have to raise the money for all the lawyer fees.

 

[Muhammed]

I'm curious. There's all sorts of noise about a 3rd party candidate paying for recounts in three major states. This report is the FINAL result of an automatic recount due to the closeness of the result. How can she call (pay for) another recount? Isn't this a FINAL result?

Stein is calling for a hand count of the paper ballots to double check the electronic results.

Stein has no chance of winning. So there is obviously an ulterior motive. Perhaps Stein is trying to commit voter fraud in favor of Hillary while giving Crooked Hillary a layer of plausible deniability if they get busted.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Won't be granted? On what grounds? The rules are, as long as a candidate asks for it, and is willing to pay the fees for it, and they meet the deadline to file for it... they can.

Won't be granted because A- there has to be evidence of "hacking" or "rigging" and B- the vote isn't close enough for the auto recall. C- you can't force an hand count of votes of four states costing in the tens of millions of dollars bpjust because you lost.

You lose.

Well what a fail post. A, there doesn't have to be beforehand evidence in order to call for a hand count of the paper ballots, it's one of the provisions associated with using computer voting. B, this isn't an auto recall. And C... the candidates are the ones that have to pay for the recount.

Why are you on here posting shit about something and you don't even know the VERY basic parts of the argument?

Of course there has to be a legitimate legal reason why a vote that has been verified and certified by election officials and observers, should be recounted! They would have to show solid evidence of that the integrity of a vote has been corrupted to the point that it could change the outcome (no such evidence exists) or, the vote is simply to close, which is t the case either. You're shit outta luck. Say hello to president Trump.

Your opinion is not supported by the facts. Sux to be you.

Well then, why don't you show us the facts? What does it take to recount an election result that has been certified by election officials of that state?

Do you really think claiming (whining) that "certain computer scientists have found that the results defy past computer stats on voter behavior" is considered a legitimate probable cause to investigate an election process who's integrity has been observed and verified at every stage by sworn election officials of that state? Ha ha ha.

Ha ha ha. You have shown us nothing but your ass. Jill Stein is financing a recount, and you simply can't show that there is any legal barrier against it.