no bigotry to be found there, i believe.
muslims should support muslims.
There is no reason for the US military to become involved. given time and support, the IDF can destroy the terrorists. Given the resources the so called Palestinians will be lining up to leave. Trump should send travel agents, not soldiers. It's really not a very complicated or difficult plan, but it will take a few years to accomplish.
I think this is close, but not quite the right question. Let's try this instead: Might (voluntary or incentivized) ethnic cleansing that leads to peace ultimately cause less harm than on-going war?
Even a brainless bigot like you should be able to understand that removing the so called Palestinians from Gaza is not ethnic cleansing. They are not being removed because of who they are but because of what they do, ie, refuse to live in peace with Israel.
Ironically, that suggestion was made recently in an ICJ advisory opinion, and yet that didn't create this kind of outrage. Ethnically cleansing Jews seems to be acceptable.
What constitutes voluntary? Is creating and/or perpetrating a situation that is so unlivable people have no choice but to leave to survive “voluntary”? Will they be allowed to return?
So is ethnically cleansing Palestinians. Where do we go from here?
As I attempted to point out in my post, the intent is that peace with (voluntary incentivized) ethnic cleansing may be less harmful than an on-going war.
Well no, the plan, in its entirety, is to rebuild Gaza and ensure it has a thriving economy and a successful government going forward.
It will be up to the new government of Gaza, whoever that turns out to be. They should act according to the understanding that they will not be permitted to return as citizens.
The lack of $ available to Gaza has not been a limiting factor, so yeah, incentivize away. All those UNWRA funds, lets put them towards ending the fake refugee status of the people of Gaza by putting the money in their own hands to build a life that suits them.
Well, if its fair for the one, its fair for the other.
“Sending people out” and not allowing them to return is going increase radicalization if you are talking about expulsions.
Why?
Why not?
Please tell me you understand why this is a hard, hard, hard NO.
So we a bunch of people on one side wanting to expel Jews and a bunch people on the other side wanting to expel Palestinians. However it is worth noting only one side actually has the power carry an expulsion and has actually entertained ideas to do so.
I would agree in principle. But they made their decisions. Now someone else has to step in and drive this train. They have proven that they are not, at the moment, capable.
What do we do in the meantime, for the next three generations?
