Trump Was Asked About A Key Promise. What Followed Was Pure Gibberish

[citygator]

Literally it does not matter to his supporters what he does. As long as there is someone somewhere bothered by his incompetence they are happy.

• Letters mailed out saying we are raising tariffs isn’t negotiating better deals. They are actually worse deals
• There are zero deals in place and barely 2 or 3 general understandings to begin negotiating around general understandings.
• Corporate executives and decision makers cannot make informed decisions based on Trump just winging everything. The result will be inefficiency and cost cutting. Corporate investments are plummeting.

 

[hjmick]

Thanks…good to clear things up civilly for a change

Agreed.

 

[Correll]

Literally it does not matter to his supporters what he does. As long as there is someone somewhere bothered by his incompetence they are happy.

• Letters mailed out saying we are raising tariffs isn’t negotiating better deals. They are actually worse deals
• There are zero deals in place and barely 2 or 3 general understandings to begin negotiating around general understandings.
• Corporate executives and decision makers cannot make informed decisions based on Trump just winging everything. The result will be inefficiency and cost cutting. Corporate investments are plummeting.

View attachment 1134764
View attachment 1134764

The choice was between the left which has given up on the very idea of protecting or advancing American interests

or Trump who is at least trying.


ONly a fool would have voted for Kamala.

 

[citygator]

The choice was between the left which has given up on the very idea of protecting or advancing American interests

or Trump who is at least trying.


ONly a fool would have voted for Kamala.

Kamala would have submitted a $3T smaller deficit. How is that not in America’s interest? I think you guys were fooled by a rich liberal who cons conservatives.


Trumps not religious

Trumps not fiscally conservative

Trump doesn’t embrace conservative values.

He’s not a protector of American democracy or traditions.

He is the anti-conservative. Not sure how you can be satisfied.

 

[j-mac]

Kamala would have submitted a $3T smaller deficit. How is that not in America’s interest?

What is your proof of this claim now? It’s freaking delusional…

 

[citygator]

What is your proof of this claim now? It’s freaking delusional…

Trump added $3T to the deficit. No one debates that. The last Biden budget was $3T lower in deficit. No republican is voting for a $3T increase in the deficit submitted by a Democrat.. only if it is submitted by a Republican. We would be better off financially with a Democrat in office... as always. There has never been a time when that wasnt true in modern times.

 

[j-mac]

Trump added $3T to the deficit. No one debates that. The last Biden budget was $3T lower in deficit. No republican is voting for a $3T increase in the deficit submitted by a Democrat.. only if it is submitted by a Republican. We would be better off financially with a Democrat in office... as always. There has never been a time when that wasnt true in modern times.

So, you have no reasonable argument that a democrat in office would be more fiscally responsible than a Republican these days.

And do you know why? Two reasons.

1. It’s not the President who makes the sausage.

2. We’re talking about giant bills here. The President doesn’t have much control over what the congress produces as the final product. Other than the veto of course, and politically that’s just unreasonable, because the minority would shred him for not funding vital services.

So, it’s a dishonest argument to say a democrat would be any different these days than a republican.

 

[citygator]

So, you have no reasonable argument that a democrat in office would be more fiscally responsible than a Republican these days.

And do you know why? Two reasons.

1. It’s not the President who makes the sausage.

2. We’re talking about giant bills here. The President doesn’t have much control over what the congress produces as the final product. Other than the veto of course, and politically that’s just unreasonable, because the minority would shred him for not funding vital services.

So, it’s a dishonest argument to say a democrat would be any different these days than a republican.

I have 100% proof in that the last Democratic bill submitted by Biden DID NOT ADD $3T and EVERY democrat voted against this bill. I noticed you are not debating that Trump added $3T to the budget deficit. I suppose you think that is the fault of democrats.

 

[j-mac]

I have 100% proof in that the last Democratic bill submitted by Biden DID NOT ADD $3T and EVERY democrat voted against this bill

How about all the other bills?

. I noticed you are not debating that Trump added $3T to the budget deficit.

Trump signed it, he didn’t write it

I suppose you think that is the fault of democrats.

Strawman. I never said any such thing

 

[citygator]

How about all the other bills?

Trump signed it, he didn’t write it

Strawman. I never said any such thing

The statement I made stands. We would be $3T wealthier if Harris was elected. She wasnt .So we are not.

 

[j-mac]

The statement I made stands. We would be $3T wealthier if Harris was elected. She wasnt .So we are not.

And, my response to that silliness stands...We could just as easily be $3T poorer under Harris...

 

[Correll]

Kamala would have submitted a $3T smaller deficit. How is that not in America’s interest? I think you guys were fooled by a rich liberal who cons conservatives.


Trumps not religious

Trumps not fiscally conservative

Trump doesn’t embrace conservative values.

He’s not a protector of American democracy or traditions.

He is the anti-conservative. Not sure how you can be satisfied.

I like how you pretended to forget that we were talking about tariffs, a point that YOU brought up.

You are running away from YOUR OWN POINT, after just one post from me.


That's pathetic.


That reveals that you know that my counterpoint crushed your point.

 

[citygator]

I like how you pretended to forget that we were talking about tariffs, a point that YOU brought up.

You are running away from YOUR OWN POINT, after just one post from me.


That's pathetic.


That reveals that you know that my counterpoint crushed your point.

You can just scroll up. You specifically stated that you had a bad choice against Trump for president and I outlined one way the other choice would have been much better - budget deficits. $3T would have been worth the fact you didnt like her laugh.

 

[Correll]

You can just scroll up. You specifically stated that you had a bad choice against Trump for president and I outlined one way the other choice would have been much better - budget deficits. $3T would have been worth the fact you didnt like her laugh.

This is YOUR post, that I responded to, making the choice point. YOU made a point about tariffs and when I pointed out that your point was false, you changed the subject. Without any admission or consession on your previous point. THatt cowardice on your part.


"

• Letters mailed out saying we are raising tariffs isn’t negotiating better deals. They are actually worse deals
• There are zero deals in place and barely 2 or 3 general understandings to begin negotiating around general understandings.
• Corporate executives and decision makers cannot make informed decisions based on Trump just winging everything. The result will be inefficiency and cost cutting. Corporate investments are plummeting."