Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll tell you what...What do you have to prove that the biggest narcissist we have ever seen did not say those things? Your flat refusal to accept these entirely plausible allegations says a lot about you. I am not trying to change your mind. Only you can do that. If anything I am ridiculing the attitude of the Trump true believers who will follow him no matter what he defiles.Well, some evidence that you're not lying out your ass would help....I've already stated that there is nothing that could sway your blind support for your dear leader. You are probably proud of that fact.Translation: You've got nothing.....In the end you are going to believe whatever you want. The real tragedy is that when Trump is out of office for a few years you will not admit having ever supported him.Well, asking you to give us some reason to believe you, like actual statements from witnesses (where we don't assume that you're just trying to feed us some fabricated bullshit) isn't unreasonable....Your wish for absolute verification is a lie since you probably totally accept all the totally unverified Qanon crap.How about giving us some proof of what you're claiming, since Bolton (no fan of Trump) has even publically stated that it's a lie????How about acting as if you are not a blind follower of a deeply flawed leader? The reason the Atlantic article has gained so much traction is that it rings true with what is already known. When Trump is finally out of office and the price of telling the truth is no longer so high all these people will come forward, will you still think it's a lie?How about giving us a verifiable witness????You are still defending Trump after everything he has done and said right out in the open. Doubtful there is any piece of verified information that you would accept or any action by him that would move you to withdraw your support.If you have one, post it....If we had tape of these statements coming out of his mouth you would still defend him.So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.
Not to the journalists.
Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....
If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....
Otherwise, you just have an allegation with no identifiable "witnesses"...
We don't know if they even exist, or if one of the drug-addled reporters at the Atlantic just made it up....
You don't have one, do you????
Just as I thought....
But you don't have any....
We have a Department of Education. One person cannot be expected to understand or know everything that is going on. Merely using the bully pulpit and being willing to be arbitrary and capricious is a misuse of power.It is not the job of the President to deny or disparage educational curriculum. We have a Department of Education to look into those matters and then provide guidance.Proof right wingers don't care about misuse of power.Good, but not enough. The public school system needs to be purged of all revisionist nonsense.
Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'
Please explain the "misuse of power" you describe in legal terms.
the whole USA is the president's job The idiotic
1619 program is DANGEROUS RADICAL ETHNOCENTRISM (the stuff of which fascism is made)
Only from Fox News Channel?We dont fall for unsourced lies from the liberal news mediaUnlike the fantastical right wing?
I guess you are accusing conservatives in general not me specificallyYou damned sure swallow unsourced allegations if they come from some conservative blog no one ever heard of.
this is Alice in Wonderland illogicWhat do you have to prove that the biggest narcissist we have ever seen did not say those things?
It is not the job of the President to deny or disparage educational curriculum. We have a Department of Education to look into those matters and then provide guidance.Proof right wingers don't care about misuse of power.Good, but not enough. The public school system needs to be purged of all revisionist nonsense.
Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'
Please explain the "misuse of power" you describe in legal terms.
Where is the official review of the Department of Education on this issue?It is not the job of the President to deny or disparage educational curriculum. We have a Department of Education to look into those matters and then provide guidance.Proof right wingers don't care about misuse of power.Good, but not enough. The public school system needs to be purged of all revisionist nonsense.
Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'
Please explain the "misuse of power" you describe in legal terms.
To whom does the Department of Education answer?
Where is the official review of the Department of Education on this issue?It is not the job of the President to deny or disparage educational curriculum. We have a Department of Education to look into those matters and then provide guidance.Proof right wingers don't care about misuse of power.Good, but not enough. The public school system needs to be purged of all revisionist nonsense.
Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'
Please explain the "misuse of power" you describe in legal terms.
To whom does the Department of Education answer?
How about acting as if you are not a blind follower of a deeply flawed leader? The reason the Atlantic article has gained so much traction is that it rings true with what is already known. When Trump is finally out of office and the price of telling the truth is no longer so high all these people will come forward, will you still think it's a lie?How about giving us a verifiable witness????You are still defending Trump after everything he has done and said right out in the open. Doubtful there is any piece of verified information that you would accept or any action by him that would move you to withdraw your support.If you have one, post it....If we had tape of these statements coming out of his mouth you would still defend him.So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.
Not to the journalists.
Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....
If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....
Otherwise, you just have an allegation with no identifiable "witnesses"...
We don't know if they even exist, or if one of the drug-addled reporters at the Atlantic just made it up....
You don't have one, do you????
Only to the right wing. Misuse of power to push right wing bigotry and race baiting is not the job of the President of our Republic.Where is the official review of the Department of Education on this issue?It is not the job of the President to deny or disparage educational curriculum. We have a Department of Education to look into those matters and then provide guidance.Proof right wingers don't care about misuse of power.Good, but not enough. The public school system needs to be purged of all revisionist nonsense.
Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'
Please explain the "misuse of power" you describe in legal terms.
To whom does the Department of Education answer?
Irrelevant in any case.
Only to the right wing. Misuse of power to push right wing bigotry and race baiting is not the job of the President of our Republic.Where is the official review of the Department of Education on this issue?It is not the job of the President to deny or disparage educational curriculum. We have a Department of Education to look into those matters and then provide guidance.Proof right wingers don't care about misuse of power.Good, but not enough. The public school system needs to be purged of all revisionist nonsense.
Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'
Please explain the "misuse of power" you describe in legal terms.
To whom does the Department of Education answer?
Irrelevant in any case.
There are good people on both sides.Only to the right wing. Misuse of power to push right wing bigotry and race baiting is not the job of the President of our Republic.Where is the official review of the Department of Education on this issue?It is not the job of the President to deny or disparage educational curriculum. We have a Department of Education to look into those matters and then provide guidance.Proof right wingers don't care about misuse of power.Good, but not enough. The public school system needs to be purged of all revisionist nonsense.
Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'
Please explain the "misuse of power" you describe in legal terms.
To whom does the Department of Education answer?
Irrelevant in any case.
Without a legal basis, you have no argument.
There are good people on both sides.Only to the right wing. Misuse of power to push right wing bigotry and race baiting is not the job of the President of our Republic.Where is the official review of the Department of Education on this issue?It is not the job of the President to deny or disparage educational curriculum. We have a Department of Education to look into those matters and then provide guidance.Proof right wingers don't care about misuse of power.Good, but not enough. The public school system needs to be purged of all revisionist nonsense.
Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'
Please explain the "misuse of power" you describe in legal terms.
To whom does the Department of Education answer?
Irrelevant in any case.
Without a legal basis, you have no argument.
Good, but not enough. The public school system needs to be purged of all revisionist nonsense.
Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'
Lol..That proposal was nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.
Like yellow journalism during the Industrial Revolution?Good, but not enough. The public school system needs to be purged of all revisionist nonsense.
Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'
“1619 Project Creator Admits “It Is Not A History” But a Fight “to Control the National Narrative”
Critic: 1619 Project trying to have it both ways, “it’s presented as “history” when convenient, to give it credibility (as in the curriculum description) but deemed non-history when its lack of historical rigor has been challenged.”
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AK) thrust the New York Times‘ 1619 Project back into the spotlight when he threatened to defund schools that use it in the curriculum.
The discussion led creator Hannah Jones to admit the 1619 Project is not history, but a “work of journalism.”
The 1619 Project leads one to believe the founding of America happened in 1619 when the first slave ship arrived in Virginia. The introduction states: “No aspect of the country that would be formed here has been untouched by the years of slavery that followed.” The beginning explains:
The 1619 Project is an ongoing initiative from The New York Times Magazine that began in August 2019, the 400th anniversary of the beginning of American slavery. It aims to reframe the country’s history by placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the very center of our national narrative.
…. her pet project is a work of fiction.
Even if Jones wanted the 1619 Project to be a “work in journalism” she chose the wrong term. Journalism, like history, should report the truth. Not your truth. Not alternative facts.”
1619 Project Creator Admits "It Is Not A History" But a Fight "to Control the National Narrative"
are you a paid shill?Lol..That proposal was nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.
It's pretty much a political IQ test that you just failed.
The Left teaches children to hate each otherGood, but not enough. The public school system needs to be purged of all revisionist nonsense.
Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'
Link? Or should we take right wing fantasy seriously.The Left teaches children to hate each otherGood, but not enough. The public school system needs to be purged of all revisionist nonsense.
Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'