Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'

[Billy_Kinetta]

Good, but not enough. The public school system needs to be purged of all revisionist nonsense.

Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'

 

[Taz]

Blacks hated being here as slaves so much that they won't go back to Africa.

 

[Not2BSubjugated]

Good, but not enough. The public school system needs to be purged of all revisionist nonsense.

Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'

Agreed that the America is the great satan shit needs to go, but holy fuck am I thrilled to hear this, coupled with the order to purge Critical Race Theory HR training from federal organizations. If the left quietly capitulates, it'll be a solid first step in prying our nation free of this Hotel Rwanda reenactment. I find that to be highly unlikely.

If they make noise about it, it'll force CRT, Social Justice, Intersectionalism, The Fallen One, Beelzebub, Wandering Star - oh shit, I'm mixing up my polyonymous evils. Anyway, it'll force this race war ideology into mainstream conversation where it'll be nigh impossible for lefty media/social media to obscure the fact that it's antithetical to the civil rights mantle that they've draped over it.

 

[JLW]

Lol..That proposal was nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.

 

[Not2BSubjugated]

Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.

Pretty good deflection, even if I believed anonymous sources over the named ones who have attested to being present at the time in question and hearing Trump say no such thing.

Anyway, comparing these two things seems to me to indicate that you lefties have gotten so much mileage out of shutting people down for past incidents of naughty language, that some of you have honestly forgotten that deeds are infinitely more significant than offhand utterances.

 

[Obiwan]

Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.

Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....

 

[Penelope]

Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.

Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....

Not to the journalists.

 

[Obiwan]

Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.

Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....

Not to the journalists.

If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....

Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....

 

[occupied]

Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.

Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....

Not to the journalists.

If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....

Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....

Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.

 

[Obiwan]

Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.

Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....

Not to the journalists.

If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....

Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....

Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.

So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????

If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....

 

[Mac-7]

Not to the journalists.

“Journalists?”

no one cares what the lib reporters think

 

[BlueGin]

Lol..That proposal was nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.

Nobody believes that Trump hate soldiers more than democrats do. Get real. The democrat Marxists want to defund them...right along with the police,ICE and firefighters.

 

[occupied]

Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.

Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....

Not to the journalists.

If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....

Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....

Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.

So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????

If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....

If we had tape of these statements coming out of his mouth you would still defend him.

 

[Obiwan]

Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.

Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....

Not to the journalists.

If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....

Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....

Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.

So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????

If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....

If we had tape of these statements coming out of his mouth you would still defend him.

If you have one, post it....

Otherwise, you just have an allegation with no identifiable "witnesses"...

We don't know if they even exist, or if one of the drug-addled reporters at the Atlantic just made it up....

 

[Mac-7]

Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.

Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....

Not to the journalists.

If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....

Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....

Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.

So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????

If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....

If we had tape of these statements coming out of his mouth you would still defend him.

You dont have tape

and the liberal journalists have NO credibility remaining

 

[occupied]

Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.

Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....

Not to the journalists.

If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....

Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....

Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.

So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????

If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....

If we had tape of these statements coming out of his mouth you would still defend him.

If you have one, post it....

Otherwise, you just have an allegation with no identifiable "witnesses"...

We don't know if they even exist, or if one of the drug-addled reporters at the Atlantic just made it up....

You are still defending Trump after everything he has done and said right out in the open. Doubtful there is any piece of verified information that you would accept or any action by him that would move you to withdraw your support.

 

[Obiwan]

Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.

Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....

Not to the journalists.

If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....

Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....

Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.

So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????

If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....

If we had tape of these statements coming out of his mouth you would still defend him.

If you have one, post it....

Otherwise, you just have an allegation with no identifiable "witnesses"...

We don't know if they even exist, or if one of the drug-addled reporters at the Atlantic just made it up....

You are still defending Trump after everything he has done and said right out in the open. Doubtful there is any piece of verified information that you would accept or any action by him that would move you to withdraw your support.

How about giving us a verifiable witness????

You don't have one, do you????

 

[danielpalos]

Good, but not enough. The public school system needs to be purged of all revisionist nonsense.

Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'

Proof right wingers don't care about misuse of power.

 

[Blues Lifer]

Lol..That proposal was nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.

Nobody believes that Trump hate soldiers more than democrats do. Get real. The democrat Marxists want to defund them...right along with the police,ICE and firefighters.

Pretty much this. I don't believe that military bullshit. Even if I did, I would chalk it up to Trump lacking a filter and not thinking it out with the sensitivity it deserves. So ugly stuff, but many say ugly stuff that they later agree is not ultimately how they feel.

The Left has been so foul, nasty, and destructive.. that even if the Trump comment had legs, it would still be so minor, in comparison.

 

[occupied]

Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.

Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....

Not to the journalists.

If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....

Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....

Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.

So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????

If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....

If we had tape of these statements coming out of his mouth you would still defend him.

If you have one, post it....

Otherwise, you just have an allegation with no identifiable "witnesses"...

We don't know if they even exist, or if one of the drug-addled reporters at the Atlantic just made it up....

You are still defending Trump after everything he has done and said right out in the open. Doubtful there is any piece of verified information that you would accept or any action by him that would move you to withdraw your support.

How about giving us a verifiable witness????

You don't have one, do you????

How about acting as if you are not a blind follower of a deeply flawed leader? The reason the Atlantic article has gained so much traction is that it rings true with what is already known. When Trump is finally out of office and the price of telling the truth is no longer so high all these people will come forward, will you still think it's a lie?