Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 69,687
- 50,387
- 3,565
I agree with IcebergThere isn’t any hate in my post. I simply shared my opinion and for some reason you got you all pissy about it.
all you care about is does trump win or does he lose?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree with IcebergThere isn’t any hate in my post. I simply shared my opinion and for some reason you got you all pissy about it.
while i do agree "free enterprise" needs to be left alone, that simply isn't how it works.This is an direct attack on American history and an indirect attack on our present and futurein the overall scheme of things, pork is old school and simply how it's done anymore.With libs everything is inside politics
they dont care what happens as long as they win
trump is standing up for a principle
sec 230 needs to go and new rules need to match the times. but the domination will sooner or later be addressed by the DOJ.
Stating a veto override is embarrassing to a president isn’t an attack, it’s stating a fact. I think if President Trump vetos the bill it will get overridden. It’s apart of the topic at hand, even if you would rather discuss other aspects of it.because i'm tired of people attacking trump instead of issues. i'd rather talk about Sec 230, merits, should it go, should it go this way, should it be replaced and so on.There isn’t any hate in my post. I simply shared my opinion and for some reason you got you all pissy about it.Oh lord, just stop.A veto override in the waning days of President Trump's administration would be rather embarrassing.
you and so many others never talk the issues, just hate the people.
far too many people in here (both sides yes) hear a name and have a pavlovs dog reaction and attack the person and totally ignore the actual topic.
I agree with IcebergThere isn’t any hate in my post. I simply shared my opinion and for some reason you got you all pissy about it.
all you care about is does trump win or does he lose?
it doesn't. What is embarrassing is wanting to line the pockets of those who support you over helping the American people. Something Pelosi's house has been doing for four years. That is embarrassing.In no way is it any more embarrassing than every veto ever signed by a Dermocrat.A veto override in the waning days of President Trump's administration would be rather embarrassing.
It's always a bit of an embarrassment to be overridden. A veto override in your lame duck period adds a little more to it in my opinion.
Just another Trumpyhissyfit. I say let him veto it, and let's see how many Banana Republicans he really has.
What an embarrassment that Bunch is.
Trump Threatens To Veto Defense Authorization Act Unless It Fully Terminates Section 230
President Donald Trump threatened to veto the National Defense Authorization Act unless the budget bill includes language that would terminate Section 230.dailycaller.com
not sure how this is related to each other but for far too long we've been putting add ons to bills simply to force them through.
S230 needs to go and social media needs new rules but not sure I like it done this way.
Trump Threatens To Veto Defense Authorization Act Unless It Fully Terminates Section 230
President Donald Trump threatened to veto the National Defense Authorization Act unless the budget bill includes language that would terminate Section 230.dailycaller.com
not sure how this is related to each other but for far too long we've been putting add ons to bills simply to force them through.
S230 needs to go and social media needs new rules but not sure I like it done this way.
Kinda interesting that the article mentions Section 230 and prints Rump's twats about it --- yet never explains what "Section 230" IS. Wonder why they're trying to keep a lid on it.
47 U.S. Code § 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material
Ruh roh. Rumpypants shitting his pants over the prospect that he mightn't have his own megaphone to spout bullshit without it being challenged, so he's gonna throw yet another tantrum from Tiny Desk. WAAAAH.
Hard to believe any sentient human could have ever voted for this shit. And it's not like it wasn't well known from the beginning:
Fucking asshole spoiled little runt who can't handle any kind of contradiction at all about anything. Didn't even have the stones to go to a White House Correspondent's Dinner. Not a single one. First Resident since I think Coolidge. Good riddance to this asshole motherfucker and his contempt for the Constitution, fuck him and fuck him again. Let him wallow in LOSER misery for the rest of his worthless life, and I hope it hurts. A LOT. Get the FUCK out of the people's house, LOSER.
you mean we're not today???Just another Trumpyhissyfit. I say let him veto it, and let's see how many Banana Republicans he really has.
What an embarrassment that Bunch is.
You don't even understand the issue, foreigner. Why should big tech be shielded from liability in a bill that provides for defense?
That's just just giving shithead foreigners like the Chinese, Russians, and Iranians a "back door" to wage cyber-warfare against the US.
I'm sure glad people like you aren't in charge of protecting and defending this country, we'd be in a world of shit.
Trump Threatens To Veto Defense Authorization Act Unless It Fully Terminates Section 230
President Donald Trump threatened to veto the National Defense Authorization Act unless the budget bill includes language that would terminate Section 230.dailycaller.com
not sure how this is related to each other but for far too long we've been putting add ons to bills simply to force them through.
S230 needs to go and social media needs new rules but not sure I like it done this way.
Kinda interesting that the article mentions Section 230 and prints Rump's twats about it --- yet never explains what "Section 230" IS. Wonder why they're trying to keep a lid on it.
47 U.S. Code § 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material
Ruh roh. Rumpypants shitting his pants over the prospect that he mightn't have his own megaphone to spout bullshit without it being challenged, so he's gonna throw yet another tantrum from Tiny Desk. WAAAAH.
Hard to believe any sentient human could have ever voted for this shit. And it's not like it wasn't well known from the beginning:
Fucking asshole spoiled little runt who can't handle any kind of contradiction at all about anything. Didn't even have the stones to go to a White House Correspondent's Dinner. Not a single one. First Resident since I think Coolidge. Good riddance to this asshole motherfucker and his contempt for the Constitution, fuck him and fuck him again. Let him wallow in LOSER misery for the rest of his worthless life, and I hope it hurts. A LOT. Get the FUCK out of the people's house, LOSER.
Trump Threatens To Veto Defense Authorization Act Unless It Fully Terminates Section 230
President Donald Trump threatened to veto the National Defense Authorization Act unless the budget bill includes language that would terminate Section 230.dailycaller.com
not sure how this is related to each other but for far too long we've been putting add ons to bills simply to force them through.
S230 needs to go and social media needs new rules but not sure I like it done this way.
Kinda interesting that the article mentions Section 230 and prints Rump's twats about it --- yet never explains what "Section 230" IS. Wonder why they're trying to keep a lid on it.
47 U.S. Code § 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material
Ruh roh. Rumpypants shitting his pants over the prospect that he mightn't have his own megaphone to spout bullshit without it being challenged, so he's gonna throw yet another tantrum from Tiny Desk. WAAAAH.
Hard to believe any sentient human could have ever voted for this shit. And it's not like it wasn't well known from the beginning:
Fucking asshole spoiled little runt who can't handle any kind of contradiction at all about anything. Didn't even have the stones to go to a White House Correspondent's Dinner. Not a single one. First Resident since I think Coolidge. Good riddance to this asshole motherfucker and his contempt for the Constitution, fuck him and fuck him again. Let him wallow in LOSER misery for the rest of his worthless life, and I hope it hurts. A LOT. Get the FUCK out of the people's house, LOSER.
like i said - people come in and can't talk the issue, they must attack trump.
Trump Threatens To Veto Defense Authorization Act Unless It Fully Terminates Section 230
President Donald Trump threatened to veto the National Defense Authorization Act unless the budget bill includes language that would terminate Section 230.dailycaller.com
not sure how this is related to each other but for far too long we've been putting add ons to bills simply to force them through.
S230 needs to go and social media needs new rules but not sure I like it done this way.
Kinda interesting that the article mentions Section 230 and prints Rump's twats about it --- yet never explains what "Section 230" IS. Wonder why they're trying to keep a lid on it.
47 U.S. Code § 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material
Ruh roh. Rumpypants shitting his pants over the prospect that he mightn't have his own megaphone to spout bullshit without it being challenged, so he's gonna throw yet another tantrum from Tiny Desk. WAAAAH.
Hard to believe any sentient human could have ever voted for this shit. And it's not like it wasn't well known from the beginning:
Fucking asshole spoiled little runt who can't handle any kind of contradiction at all about anything. Didn't even have the stones to go to a White House Correspondent's Dinner. Not a single one. First Resident since I think Coolidge. Good riddance to this asshole motherfucker and his contempt for the Constitution, fuck him and fuck him again. Let him wallow in LOSER misery for the rest of his worthless life, and I hope it hurts. A LOT. Get the FUCK out of the people's house, LOSER.
like i said - people come in and can't talk the issue, they must attack trump.
What's your topic here Smelly? What's the frickin' FIRST WORD IN YOUR TITLE???
Trump Threatens To Veto Defense Authorization Act Unless It Fully Terminates Section 230
President Donald Trump threatened to veto the National Defense Authorization Act unless the budget bill includes language that would terminate Section 230.dailycaller.com
not sure how this is related to each other but for far too long we've been putting add ons to bills simply to force them through.
S230 needs to go and social media needs new rules but not sure I like it done this way.
Kinda interesting that the article mentions Section 230 and prints Rump's twats about it --- yet never explains what "Section 230" IS. Wonder why they're trying to keep a lid on it.
47 U.S. Code § 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material
Ruh roh. Rumpypants shitting his pants over the prospect that he mightn't have his own megaphone to spout bullshit without it being challenged, so he's gonna throw yet another tantrum from Tiny Desk. WAAAAH.
Hard to believe any sentient human could have ever voted for this shit. And it's not like it wasn't well known from the beginning:
Fucking asshole spoiled little runt who can't handle any kind of contradiction at all about anything. Didn't even have the stones to go to a White House Correspondent's Dinner. Not a single one. First Resident since I think Coolidge. Good riddance to this asshole motherfucker and his contempt for the Constitution, fuck him and fuck him again. Let him wallow in LOSER misery for the rest of his worthless life, and I hope it hurts. A LOT. Get the FUCK out of the people's house, LOSER.
like i said - people come in and can't talk the issue, they must attack trump.
What's your topic here Smelly? What's the frickin' FIRST WORD IN YOUR TITLE???
and here we go with the personal attacks now at me.
that comes in next when you ask them to talk issues, not people.
so if "Biden wants to allow mass immigration" is a story, we can trash biden and ignore the actual topic?
Just another Trumpyhissyfit. I say let him veto it, and let's see how many Banana Republicans he really has.
What an embarrassment that Bunch is.
You don't even understand the issue, foreigner. Why should big tech be shielded from liability in a bill that provides for defense?
That's just just giving shithead foreigners like the Chinese, Russians, and Iranians a "back door" to wage cyber-warfare against the US.
I'm sure glad people like you aren't in charge of protecting and defending this country, we'd be in a world of shit.
That’s the thing. This isn’t about free speech. You want to speak online? It’s trivially easy. But a domain for $7. Rent a host server. Put your speech up on the internet.people say you have options. really? name an option that has anywhere near the clout as twitter, facebook and google (anderoid, youtube, search engine) all of these have sworn to not let an R win again, or at least Trump.
see - we agree on ONE point that it needs to be it's own bill.Right or wrong, s230 does NOT belong in a Defense spending bill.
That's bull crap Swamp creature shenanigans.... that neither side should do.... It's crooked to slip it in a must pass Defense bill...
argue the merits for or against 230, on the floor, and vote on the removal or on the keeping of it.