Trump prosecutors putting up a fight to keep cameras out of courtroom

[Father O'Blivion]

Trump prosecutors putting up a fight to keep cameras out of courtroom​

Trump prosecutors putting up a fight to keep cameras out of courtroom - Washington Examiner

Special counsel Jack Smith urged a federal judge on Friday to bar media outlets from televising the election subversion case against former President Donald Trump in Washington, DC. Last month, attorneys for a coalition of news organizations, including NBCUniversal, asked United States District...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

4 Nov 2023 ~~ By Eden Villalovas

Special counsel Jack Smith urged a federal judge on Friday to bar media outlets from televising the election subversion case against former President Donald Trump in Washington, DC.
Last month, attorneys for a coalition of news organizations, including NBCUniversal, asked United States District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan to make an exception to the longstanding rule that prohibits broadcasting and photographing criminal proceedings in federal courts under the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure.
Prosecutors are trying to uphold the rule that states, “the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings” or broadcasting those proceedings unless a judge rules otherwise.
House Democrats have also pushed for live broadcasting of the court proceedings in the criminal cases against Trump. The former president's defense attorney John Lauro agrees, telling Fox News Sunday in August he “would love to see that.”
“I personally would love to see that,” Lauro said. “I’m convinced the Biden administration does not want the American people to see the truth. And they acted on it by filing this protective order, which is an effort to keep important information about this case from the press.”
Chutkan gave Trump a week to respond to the media request, which he has yet to do, but Smith’s court filing notes that the former president’s counsel “has requested that government counsel convey that he takes no position with respect to these Applications.”
On Aug. 1, Trump was indicted in connection to his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Smith’s years long investigation...
~Snip~
Despite the Justice Department rejecting calls for his trials to be televised, a large majority, 71%, think television cameras should be allowed in the courtroom for this specific trial, according to a Quinnipiac University poll conducted shortly after Trump’s indictment.


Commentary:
The big question that the public asks is; What is the Judge and prosecution afraid of?
Sunshine never hurt anything. It makes everything cleaner and open eyed.
Just what is the DoJ, Smith and Chutkan trying to hide from the public?
Are they hiding the sham and how unjust their courtroom is?
Is it their idea that what people can’t see and hear they can get their Quisling Media to frame the false narrative?
Remember the Sixth Amendment:
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense".

Reporters are allowed. Transcripts are available.

What is being hidden?

 

[Doc7505]

Reporters are allowed. Transcripts are available.

What is being hidden?

~~~~~~
Exactly! What are the prosecutors hiding?
What exculpatory information have they refused to give the Defense?

 

[Father O'Blivion]

~~~~~~
Exactly! What are the prosecutors hiding?
What exculpatory information have they refused to give the Defense?

What does that question have to do with TV cameras in the courtroom?

 

[Superbadbrutha]

I am native american,,

youre the one that constantly complains like a little girl,,
I just figure you going back to yoyr homeland would make you happy,,

Sure you are, never heard you tell white folks to go back to Europe.

Native Americans are treated bad in this country, so you are just a ass kisser.

 

[progressive hunter]

Sure you are, never heard you tell white folks to go back to Europe.

Native Americans are treated bad in this country, so you are just a ass kisser.

so do you want me to start you a go fund me or not??

you sure arent happy here,,,

 

[Superbadbrutha]

so do you want me to start you a go fund me or not??

you sure arent happy here,,,

I c your sell out ass is real happy.

 

[progressive hunter]

I c your sell out ass is real happy.

sure am,,

thanks to white people we have warm homes and internet,,

if they never showed up I would still be freezing my ass off and bored to death,,

how do you feel about the chinese and russians colonizing africa right now??
does that bother you??

 

[Superbadbrutha]

sure am,,

thanks to white people we have warm homes and internet,,

if they never showed up I would still be freezing my ass off and bored to death,,

how do you feel about the chinese and russians colonizing africa right now??
does that bother you??

Actually thanks to Alice Parker you have a warm home, btw she is a black woman.

 

[progressive hunter]

Actually thanks to Alice Parker you have a warm home, btw she is a black woman.

she built houses??

 

[Superbadbrutha]

she built houses??

No she just invented the furnace that keeps them warm. You did say warm, didn't you?

 

[progressive hunter]

No she just invented the furnace that keeps them warm. You did say warm, didn't you?

and if not for white people she wouldnt be here to invent them,,

doesnt have anything to do with why I dont have a problem if they stay here,,

 

[Superbadbrutha]

and if not for white people she wouldnt be here to invent them,,

doesnt have anything to do with why I dont have a problem if they stay here,,

You're right, she would have been in Africa inventing them.

 

[progressive hunter]

You're right, she would have been in Africa inventing them.

did they have industrial abilities there??

not sure you can smelt steel in a woven basket,,

but I do agree,, democratas should have picked their own cotten and left blacks in africa,,

 

[Superbadbrutha]

did they have industrial abilities there??

not sure you can smelt steel in a woven basket,,

Probably as many as Native Americans had, see these folks have civilizations set up before the white man came on the scene. Of course you do know that. Wow a boot licking Native American.

 

[progressive hunter]

Probably as many as Native Americans had, see these folks have civilizations set up before the white man came on the scene. Of course you do know that. Wow a boot licking Native American.

some of us did,, some of us just wandered around attacking other tribes and taking their lands,, and enslaving them if we thiught it would benefit us,,

 

[Superbadbrutha]

some of us did,, some of us just wandered around attacking other tribes and taking their lands,, and enslaving them if we thiught it would benefit us,,

Kind of like what the Vikings were doing, btw they were white. Like they were doing in Europe for centuries as well.

 

[progressive hunter]

Kind of like what the Vikings were doing, btw they were white. Like they were doing in Europe for centuries as well.

kinda like what everyone was doing back then,,

 

[toobfreak]

They don't want tRump to turn it into a circus.

Really? Wouldn't that play right into their hands making it easier to discredit him? No, they are afraid of the public seeing this sham trial.

 

[WEATHER53]

kinda like what everyone was doing back then,,

You can’t judge 70-170 years ago based on todays far more advanced social mores.
Non thinking libs do that All The Time

 

[Batcat]

Trump prosecutors putting up a fight to keep cameras out of courtroom​

Trump prosecutors putting up a fight to keep cameras out of courtroom - Washington Examiner

Special counsel Jack Smith urged a federal judge on Friday to bar media outlets from televising the election subversion case against former President Donald Trump in Washington, DC. Last month, attorneys for a coalition of news organizations, including NBCUniversal, asked United States District...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

4 Nov 2023 ~~ By Eden Villalovas

Special counsel Jack Smith urged a federal judge on Friday to bar media outlets from televising the election subversion case against former President Donald Trump in Washington, DC.
Last month, attorneys for a coalition of news organizations, including NBCUniversal, asked United States District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan to make an exception to the longstanding rule that prohibits broadcasting and photographing criminal proceedings in federal courts under the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure.
Prosecutors are trying to uphold the rule that states, “the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings” or broadcasting those proceedings unless a judge rules otherwise.
House Democrats have also pushed for live broadcasting of the court proceedings in the criminal cases against Trump. The former president's defense attorney John Lauro agrees, telling Fox News Sunday in August he “would love to see that.”
“I personally would love to see that,” Lauro said. “I’m convinced the Biden administration does not want the American people to see the truth. And they acted on it by filing this protective order, which is an effort to keep important information about this case from the press.”
Chutkan gave Trump a week to respond to the media request, which he has yet to do, but Smith’s court filing notes that the former president’s counsel “has requested that government counsel convey that he takes no position with respect to these Applications.”
On Aug. 1, Trump was indicted in connection to his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Smith’s years long investigation...
~Snip~
Despite the Justice Department rejecting calls for his trials to be televised, a large majority, 71%, think television cameras should be allowed in the courtroom for this specific trial, according to a Quinnipiac University poll conducted shortly after Trump’s indictment.


Commentary:
The big question that the public asks is; What is the Judge and prosecution afraid of?
Sunshine never hurt anything. It makes everything cleaner and open eyed.
Just what is the DoJ, Smith and Chutkan trying to hide from the public?
Are they hiding the sham and how unjust their courtroom is?
Is it their idea that what people can’t see and hear they can get their Quisling Media to frame the false narrative?
Remember the Sixth Amendment:
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense".

If the prosecutors have a strong case they should have no fears of cameras.