This motion by the Bragg hacks should have been denied summarily. Instead, as expected, a NYC liberal Democrat Parody judge not only entertained it, but is granting it:
Trump appeared on a video feed at a Manhattan courtroom where a judge warned him that evidence from pretrial discovery is strictly prohibited.
apple.news
Because he is accused the ruling seeks to silence his right to free speech on the absurd ground that sharing stuff given to the defense by the prosecution might be perceived as “threatening” to witnesses.
Give us a fucking break. Bragg is trying his case in the press. That was unethical from jump street. And now he’s afraid that the accused (who is presumed innocent in the eyes of the law) might get to share his own side with the public.
Who is likely to feel “threatened?” The disbarred scumbag criminally convicted perjurer, Cohen? Bullshit.
Name anybody, who isn’t already known to the world as a prosecution witness in this case, who might feel “threatened” if Trump discusses discovery material on Truth Social?