Trump threatens ‘harsh measures’ if convicted GOP election denier Tina Peters not freed

She was found guilty of three counts of attempting to influence a public servant and one count of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, I can't see any charge pertaining to "denying the election".
I don’t care that she was…the Central Park five were found guilty, Nelson Mandela was found guilty, the Scottsboro Boys, etc
 
Because I am trying to have a discussion over what a President should be able to do.


Define fight.
I think a president should call out injustice whenever he or she can

Why don’t you?
 
Its not just here in the USA, he's also been coercing the Brazilian Government and the Israeli government to do as he says and cease prosecuting Bolsonaro and Nazinyahu, the man is unhinged, totally loopy and a disaster waiting to happen.
 
I think a president should call out injustice whenever he or she can

Why don’t you?
So use his bully pulpit. Thats a time honored tradition. :thup:
How do you square that with threatening 'harsh measures?'
 
iu
more evidence Duke :(

Peters, a former Mesa County clerk, was found guilty by a jury in 2024 on seven counts, including four felonies, for helping to facilitate access to the county’s voting equipment in search of voter fraud that she and her allies were unable to prove following the 2020 election.
 
Its not just here in the USA, he's also been coercing the Brazilian Government and the Israeli government to do as he says and cease prosecuting Bolsonaro and Nazinyahu, the man is unhinged, totally loopy and a disaster waiting to happen.
And what are your thoughts on the hypothetical?
 
Its not just here in the USA, he's also been coercing the Brazilian Government and the Israeli government to do as he says and cease prosecuting Bolsonaro and Nazinyahu, the man is unhinged, totally loopy and a disaster waiting to happen.
Remember when the Demafasict interfered in the Israeli election to try and stop Bing? In fact they used tax dollars via USAid to do that and help hamas


I do…fascist hate Jews
 
I don’t care that she was…the Central Park five were found guilty, Nelson Mandela was found guilty, the Scottsboro Boys, etc
And in which of those cases did the then president publicly assert their innocence? You seem to be confused.

Those cases are miscarriages of justice, the election fraud case is not, trump is asserting her innocence not her possible innocence due to some judicial error or mishap. If he's concerned about the veracity of her trial he would say so.

He's just waffling as usual, she won't be released and that's then end of it.
 
So use his bully pulpit. Thats a time honored tradition. :thup:
How do you square that with threatening 'harsh measures?'
What else would you do to someone if they were imprisoning someone injusticely?

Did we not have harsh measure on South Africa when they wouldn’t release Mandela? And he actually did commit acts of violence
 
So use his bully pulpit. Thats a time honored tradition. :thup:
How do you square that with threatening 'harsh measures?'
What else would you do to someone if they were imprisoning someone injusticely?

Did we not have harsh measure on South Africa when they wouldn’t release Mandela? And he actually did commit acts of violence
 
15th post
Trump threatened harsh measures against Colorado, if it doesn't free convicted felon Tina Peters. What does USMB think? Should a President threaten a state unless it releases comsome convicted of a felony abusing her position to benefit that President?

Trump threatens ‘harsh measures’ if convicted GOP election denier Tina Peters not freed​

Hmmmm.
Peters, 68, was convicted of three counts of attempting to influence a public official; conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation; official misconduct; violation of duty; and failure to comply with an order of the Secretary of State.

Prosecutors reminded the jurors that Peters had surveillance cameras turned off in the secure tabulation room before she brought in a former pro surfer named Conan Hayes to copy information from the hard drives on that system. She used an encrypted messaging system with her small band of co-conspirators. She had some of those conspirators start using burner phones so their conversations could not be monitored by law enforcement. She bragged about having a “hidey hole” in her house where she placed a phone that was initially overlooked by law officers who searched her house.

So much for the former party of Law and Justice.
Screw Donny for his childish vindictive behavior in this matter. The president should have no control over state courts and the juries, made up of people living in the state.
 
I think the election of 2024 is great evidence the prior one was stolen
Evidence that no court would allow. Kind of like the evidence the Terrible Trump lawyer had? None.
 
Back
Top Bottom