Trump threatens ‘harsh measures’ if convicted GOP election denier Tina Peters not freed

[struth]

Lets go with that. What if someone is convicted of firebombing a state courthouse and the President demanded that person be released or there would be 'harsh measures' against the state?

Why would a president do that? Are you comparing firebombing a court house to denying an election?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Because democrats are fascist.

Only democrats are allowed to deny election results.

Your posts seem to be very much like a bug ridden cheap AI program.

 

[Zincwarrior]

How's the straw clutching? lmao

Greg

No its called discussing a hypothetical. Lets discuss!

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Why would a president do that? Are you comparing firebombing a court house to denying an election?

Trump has asserted that she is innocent. He's not asking for judicial review or a retrial or anything like that, he's demanding her release under threats of financial pressure period. That's not how the law works here, someone needs to remind him.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Why would a president do that? Are you comparing firebombing a court house to denying an election?

Again I am taking the worst case scenario to discuss the hypothetical.

 

[struth]

Again I am taking the worst case scenario to discuss the hypothetical.

The worst case is when you lock people up for simply denying an election

That’s words

Arson of a church is well a crime

 

[Zincwarrior]

Trump has asserted that she is innocent. He's not asking for judicial review or a retrial or anything like that, he's demanding her release under threats of financial pressure period. That's now how the law works here, someone needs to remind him.

Yes this is what I want to discuss, on this here discussion board.

Lets assume for purposes that she is utterly innocent, but the evidence remains sufficient to convict, and her 4th/5th Amendment rights weren't violated.

 

[gtopa1]

No its called discussing a hypothetical. Lets discuss!

Nah; the Issues are her Rights and over the top punishment (Ist and 8th). I'll await the appeals and FBI Investigations.

Greg

 

[struth]

Trump has asserted that she is innocent. He's not asking for judicial review or a retrial or anything like that, he's demanding her release under threats of financial pressure period. That's not how the law works here, someone needs to remind him.

He’s not allowed to say he thinks she’s innocent?

What law are you referring to? The law that says it’s ok to lock someone up for simply denying an election? Well, your fascism isn’t American

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

The worst case is when you lock people up for simply denying an election

You were saying...

 

[Zincwarrior]

The worst case is when you lock people up for simply denying an election

That’s words

Arson of a church is well a crime

Yes I would hold that to be obvious.

 

[struth]

Yes I would hold that to be obvious.

So why did you make the comparison?

 

[struth]

View attachment 1152396

View attachment 1152397

You were saying...

View attachment 1152396

View attachment 1152397

You were saying...

I was saying the OP said and the charges highlight she was locked up for denying and election and questioning its security


Wow

Colorado is looking like Venezuela

 

[Zincwarrior]

Nah; the Issues are her Rights and over the top punishment (Ist and 8th). I'll await the appeals and FBI Investigations.

Greg

OK now we're getting somewhere. You would wait on her appeals, and have the FBI attempt to charge I guess the prosecutor?

He’s not allowed to say he thinks she’s innocent?

He's asserting free her, or else the state will suffer.

So why did you make the comparison?

as I said twice so far, to have the discussion about what a President should be able to do. I don't give a rip if she is innocent or guilty. I want to discuss what is appropriate for a President to do. Further, we should make the President a Democrat - lets say Obama did this insteads.

 

[Blisterfinger]

She was convicted. She has no right to commit crime.

It's looking more and more like a stolen election in 2020. The woman is a great Patriot ,Similar to Trump.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

I was saying the OP said and the charges highlight she was locked up for denying and election and questioning its security


Wow

Colorado is looking like Venezuela

She was found guilty of three counts of attempting to influence a public servant and one count of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, I can't see any charge pertaining to "denying the election", where did you read that? on a magat twitter post?

 

[Twisted Gypsy Child]

Zinco; INVESTIGATE with the FBI if he identifies a possible miscarriage of Justice and go the Appeals Route. It is also under appeal.

Ticktin, a Florida-based attorney and longtime friend of President Donald Trump, said he was willing to drop several claims the magistrate judge said were not yet handled by the State Court of Appeals and should be. The petitioners are still hoping to claim in federal court that Peters' sentencing in a state court was a violation of her 1st Amendment rights because they claim the judge at her trial factored in the potential that not putting Peters in jail would allow her to speak publicly about the election security.

No bond for former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters as backers go to federal court

Lawyers for convicted former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters on Tuesday tried to get a federal court in Denver to let her out on bond as they appeal her case in the Colorado State Court of Appeals.

www.cbsnews.com

So if the election was secure then why stop Peter's talking about it?

Greg

woops

Peters, a former Mesa County clerk, was found guilty by a jury in 2024 on seven counts, including four felonies, for helping to facilitate access to the county’s voting equipment in search of voter fraud that she and her allies were unable to prove following the 2020 election.

 

[struth]

OK now we're getting somewhere. You would wait on her appeals, and have the FBI attempt to charge I guess the prosecutor?

He's asserting free her, or else the state will suffer.

as I said twice so far, to have the discussion about what a President should be able to do. I don't give a rip if she is innocent or guilty. I want to discuss what is appropriate for a President to do. Further, we should make the President a Democrat - lets say Obama did this insteads.

Isn’t that what people do when they protest?

You don’t care that she’s innocent or guilty? Wow

And you don’t think a president should fight for imprisoned people that are innocent?

Wow

 

[Twisted Gypsy Child]

It's looking more and more like a stolen election in 2020. The woman is a great Patriot ,Similar to Trump.

I have been hearing that for years and so far a nothing burger

 

[The Duke]

Trump threatened harsh measures against Colorado, if it doesn't free convicted felon Tina Peters. What does USMB think? Should a President threaten a state unless it releases comsome convicted of a felony abusing her position to benefit that President?

Trump threatens ‘harsh measures’ if convicted GOP election denier Tina Peters not freed​

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5463191-donald-trump-tina-peters-freedom/