Trump threatens ‘harsh measures’ if convicted GOP election denier Tina Peters not freed

[gtopa1]

What should he do, if anything, to Colorado?

Zinco; INVESTIGATE with the FBI if he identifies a possible miscarriage of Justice and go the Appeals Route. It is also under appeal.

Ticktin, a Florida-based attorney and longtime friend of President Donald Trump, said he was willing to drop several claims the magistrate judge said were not yet handled by the State Court of Appeals and should be. The petitioners are still hoping to claim in federal court that Peters' sentencing in a state court was a violation of her 1st Amendment rights because they claim the judge at her trial factored in the potential that not putting Peters in jail would allow her to speak publicly about the election security.

No bond for former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters as backers go to federal court

Lawyers for convicted former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters on Tuesday tried to get a federal court in Denver to let her out on bond as they appeal her case in the Colorado State Court of Appeals.

www.cbsnews.com

So if the election was secure then why stop Peter's talking about it?

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

What rights? I don't know if she has appealed. Thats expensive.

She most definitely HAS appealed. I would even suggest Civil Rights Actions comin' round the bend!!

No bond for former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters as backers go to federal court

Lawyers for convicted former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters on Tuesday tried to get a federal court in Denver to let her out on bond as they appeal her case in the Colorado State Court of Appeals.

www.cbsnews.com

Greg

 

[Zincwarrior]

Stopfunding,

Stopping funding to a state for someone convicted of multiple felonies benefitting you? Interesting.

investigate the executive branch that is holding her for civil rights violations, lots of things the feds can do to a state

What civil rights violations?

 

[TheGreatSatan]

What was her crime?

 

[Zincwarrior]

She most definitely HAS appealed. I would even suggest Civil Rights Actions comin' round the bend!!

No bond for former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters as backers go to federal court

Lawyers for convicted former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters on Tuesday tried to get a federal court in Denver to let her out on bond as they appeal her case in the Colorado State Court of Appeals.

www.cbsnews.com

Greg

If she has appealed then that appeal will be adjudicated.

 

[struth]

Stopping funding to a state for someone convicted of multiple felonies benefitting you? Interesting.


What civil rights violations?

You said she was locked up for denying the election

On what planet besides Venezuela is that ok??

 

[TheGreatSatan]

I agree, but the punishment must fit the crime. And has she completred the appeals process? Let's see if her RIGHTS have been violated; that's FEDERAL Offenses. Sic em, Kash!!!

Of course if you're NOT into really enforcing the LAW then that is another matter.

Greg

Compromised Kash isn't playing for our team and Dan is a coward.

 

[Zincwarrior]

What was her crime?

Convicted of four felonies.

Tina Peters, former Mesa County clerk, sentenced to 9 years in prison over voting systems breach | Colorado Newsline

Judge Matthew Barrett cited Peters’ lack of remorse, and the fact she has “remained quite defiant” during his remarks before announcing the sentence.

coloradonewsline.com

On August 12, a Mesa County jury found her guilty of three felony counts of attempting to influence a public servant, one felony count of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, one misdemeanor count of official misconduct, one misdemeanor count of violation of duty in elections, and one misdemeanor count of failure to comply with the secretary of state. She was acquitted on two felony counts of criminal impersonation and one count of identity theft.

 

[struth]

Convicted of four felonies.

Tina Peters, former Mesa County clerk, sentenced to 9 years in prison over voting systems breach | Colorado Newsline

Judge Matthew Barrett cited Peters’ lack of remorse, and the fact she has “remained quite defiant” during his remarks before announcing the sentence.

coloradonewsline.com

On August 12, a Mesa County jury found her guilty of three felony counts of attempting to influence a public servant, one felony count of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, one misdemeanor count of official misconduct, one misdemeanor count of violation of duty in elections, and one misdemeanor count of failure to comply with the secretary of state. She was acquitted on two felony counts of criminal impersonation and one count of identity theft.

Your OP said it was for denying any election

Sounds like trumped up charges

She’s CO Mandela

 

[Zincwarrior]

Your OP said it was for denying any election

Sounds like trumped up charges

She’s CO Mandela

She is a self avowed election denier. However the convictions are more mundane. I am more interested in what you feel about a President threatening a state unless it releases (again...how?) a convicted felon serving their sentence on state charges.

 

[struth]

She is a self avowed election denier. However the convictions are more mundane. I am more interested in what you feel about a President threatening a state unless it releases (again...how?) a convicted felon serving their sentence on state charges.

Why are we locking people up for denying an election? What happened to the first amendment?

 

[gtopa1]

Stopping funding to a state for someone convicted of multiple felonies benefitting you? Interesting.


What civil rights violations?

"not putting Peters in jail would allow her to speak publicly about the election security."

1St Amendment RIGHTS.

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

She is a self avowed election denier. However the convictions are more mundane. I am more interested in what you feel about a President threatening a state unless it releases (again...how?) a convicted felon serving their sentence on state charges.

She's NOT denying there was an election; she's saying it was not secure. She DEMONSTRATED that it wasn't secure. Now how long should those who violated her rights get if she got NINE YEARS?? IF convicted.

Goose; meet gander!!

Greg

 

[Zincwarrior]

Why are we locking people up for denying an election? What happened to the first amendment?

We aren't. See #28.

Again, I am more interested in what you feel about a President threatening a state unless it releases (again...how?) a convicted felon serving their sentence on state charges.

 

[struth]

She's NOT denying there was an election; she's saying it was not secure. She DEMONSTRATED that it wasn't secure. Now how long should those who violated her rights get if she got NINE YEARS?? IF convicted.

Goose; meet gander!!

Greg

Burn a church, loot a small own business, firebomb a court house…you are just a peaceful protester and trump is a dictator for even sending the police

Question the security of a ballot box, then it’s prison times in a demafacist state

 

[Zincwarrior]

Burn a church, loot a small own business, firebomb a court house…you are just a peaceful protester and trump is a dictator for even sending the police

Question the security of a ballot box, then it’s prison times in a demafacist state

Lets go with that. What if someone is convicted of firebombing a state courthouse and the President demanded that person be released or there would be 'harsh measures' against the state?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Meh just pardon her like Potato did

He can't.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Why are we locking people up for denying an election? What happened to the first amendment?

Because democrats are fascist.

Only democrats are allowed to deny election results.

 

[San Souci]

Great news
It is as though God has popped down and decided to clean the streets of rubbish .

Be careful Pink Cabbage .

Much more of your silliness and he will turn you into a human turd and have you shipped to the Deep State kitchen for cooking and being eaten by your fellow Troll Bots .

All Democrats are scum

 

[gtopa1]

Lets go with that. What if someone is convicted of firebombing a state courthouse and the President demanded that person be released or there would be 'harsh measures' against the state?

How's the straw clutching? lmao

Greg