Trump thinks he can change the Constitution via EO

[Leo123]

Of course they are retard, just like everyone is in this coutry with exception of foreign diplomats.

OK so you think Nazi Germany had the 'right' to invade other countries and claim them for Germany?

 

[AntonToo]

Birthright citizenship is for the people born here, as in just-born people, dumbass. It has nothing to do with adults who were not born here.

Invaders have no right to dump a baby and call it an American citizen dufus. How can you be so blind?

Dufus, it's not the "invaders" calling the baby born on this soil an American citizen, it is the American Constitution that calls them American citizens.

Sorry you don't like that part of the Constitution.

 

[AntonToo]

Of course they are retard, just like everyone is in this coutry with exception of foreign diplomats.

OK so you think Nazi Germany had the 'right' to invade other countries and claim them for Germany?

...moron, Nazi Germany is NOT A PERSON, it is a COUNTRY.

 

[Leo123]

Ivanna wasn't an American citizen when she gave birth to her rotten crotchfruit and that makes Dumbazz Jr, Ivanka and Eric the dipshit all anchor babies. Let's send these sorry azz facists back to Czechoslovakia.

Malaria was rushed through the process and probably only had a greencard so most likely her damaged silly crotchfruit is an anchor baby too.

The more you know.

They weren't part of an invading army marching on our borders. Take a break. Calm down.

 

[Leo123]

Of course they are retard, just like everyone is in this coutry with exception of foreign diplomats.

OK so you think Nazi Germany had the 'right' to invade other countries and claim them for Germany?

...moron, Nazi Germany is NOT A PERSON, it is a COUNTRY.

What is a country made of? You clueless fool.

 

[AntonToo]

Of course they are retard, just like everyone is in this coutry with exception of foreign diplomats.

OK so you think Nazi Germany had the 'right' to invade other countries and claim them for Germany?

...moron, Nazi Germany is NOT A PERSON, it is a COUNTRY.

What is a country made of? You clueless fool.

Look just stfu and go read up on law, all you are doing here is emberassing yourself.

 

[TheMoreYouKnow]

Ivanna wasn't an American citizen when she gave birth to her rotten crotchfruit and that makes Dumbazz Jr, Ivanka and Eric the dipshit all anchor babies. Let's send these sorry azz facists back to Czechoslovakia.

Malaria was rushed through the process and probably only had a greencard so most likely her damaged silly crotchfruit is an anchor baby too.

The more you know.

They weren't part of an invading army marching on our borders. Take a break. Calm down.

The only caravan that is a trouble to America are the fools that funnel themselves into Dictator Don's rallies. And yes, Malaria and Ivanna were invaders. You aren't very good at this.

 

[Leo123]

Dufus, it's not the "invaders" calling the baby born on this soil an American citizen, it is the American Constitution that calls them American citizens.

Sorry you don't like that part of the Constitution.

Show me the part in the Constitution where it refers to invaders having 'birthright'. Or are you referring to your neo-marxist 'living breathing' Constitution?

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. To the moron he says Trumps children are not citizens he married Ivanka, she was his wife idiot, he is an American moron!
2. Those kids are American idiot!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[Leo123]

The only caravan that is a trouble to America are the fools that funnel themselves into Dictator Don's rallies. And yes, Malaria and Ivanna were invaders. You aren't very good at this.

MAGA!! MAGA!! MAGA!! Go Trump!!! You can't prove a thing. I think I hear your mommy calling from upstairs.

 

[BluesLegend]

Of course you do but then again you probably disagreed with the same "calculus" when Trump was doing the same "fire up the base on immigration" dance during the 2016 campaign, right? Seems to have worked for him then and I suspect the Presidents political advisors are in a "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mode.

.. and there is no "Tinkering with the Constitution" going on, if he does actually do this EO (big IF) then it's just going to force SCOTUS to provide an interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which is something that is well within the purview of SCOTUS according to the current standards of judicial review, or do you not agree with SCOTUS having the authority to do judicial review?

He lost the PV and won the EC by 80,000 votes in 3 states. I hope they do try to overturn the Constitution by EO. What’s next? No more 1st Amendment?

Lib please Trump won the popular vote by 1 million votes in 49 of the 50 states, 30 states out right, and over 300 EC votes, Trump destroyed you.

No. He didn’t. And the only people that believe that are Trumpanzees.

Moot point. With a week before the election, only Trumpanzees care about the caravan. Nobody else, and that includes the majority of women, independents, seniors, minorities, and young voters do.

It’s all about healthcare, and Republicans taking it away, cutting social security and Medicare, and giving tax cuts to billionaires, that they don’t agree with, and curiously enough, Republicans are not running on.

LMAO you suck at math fool. Hillary won 4 million more votes in California, Trump won the other 49 states by 1 million votes. Tissue?

Trump won on an accumulated vote total of a mere accumulated vote total of 76K votes coming out of 3 rust belt, while HIllary Clinton won the popular vote by 3 million.

And we all know that the goal posts were moved on Hillary Clinton's side of the field.

Former FBI director James Comey broke long standing DOJ protocol on 3 different occasions. The 3rd being the worst. Comey broke long standing DOJ protocol of not releasing any information within 60 days of an election. 11 days before the election and after being warned by officials, he release information anyway while millions of Americans were voting believing that charges were imminent against Hillary Clinton. Seven days later he gave birth to his nothing burger.
Eric Holder and 100 other former Justice officials sign letter blasting Comey's 'breach of protocol'
Justice officials warned FBI that Comey’s decision to update Congress was not consistent with department policy

James Clapper, National Intelligence director is on record stating it is impossible to believe that Vladimir Putin didn't change the outcome of the election. For more details on this redirect to this post on this board by clicking this link.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

More information on the Russian adds that were inundated on Facebook and shared by millions.
Analysis | These are the most popular stealth Russian Facebook ads from each month

Making Trump the most illegitimate President to ever be sworn into office.

Its not our fault you lame asses couldn't even win your own blue states

 

[Norman]

I am getting tired of winning here. And the anti-Americans at NYT are pissed.

"We’re the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the United States for 85 years, with all of those benefits,” Mr. Trump told Axios during an interview that was released in part on Tuesday, making a false claim. “It’s ridiculous. It’s ridiculous. And it has to end.”

Trump claims he can defy Constitution and end birthright citizenship - CNNPolitics

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

I just posted the text from the Constitution itself where it details the process for amending it — and you’re still ignorant??

Amending it does not make it the "living document" the left claims it to be. They claim it can be interpreted differently because todays needs are different than they were yesterday.

Mark

Dumbshit.... it’s a living document because it can be changed.

In ONLY two ways and it can ONLY be amended, not changed.

Dumbshit, Amendments can, and do, include changes.

Oh look. Another dumb **** who doesn't understand the amendment process.

Color Me NOT surprised.

LOLOL

Moron, tell me again how amendments can’t change the Constitution...

AMENDMENT XII

Note: A portion of Article II, section 1 of the Constitution was superseded by the 12th amendment.​

 

[Faun]

Sorry bout that,

1. Finally we have a smart President who gets it!
2. Its stupid to apply that to none other than slaves who were brought in against their will.
3. Letting it apply to illegals is dumb!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Have someone explain to you what ”All persons” means.

 

[Faun]

Ok go ahead and follow the REPEAL process Constitution provides for.

You don't need a constitutional amendment. There's nothing to repeal because birthright citizenship for children of illegal immmigrants does not exist in the constitution.

ENGLISH - can you read it?

Constitution states:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

It absolutely exists - DUH.

Born or nationalized does not include invaders.

That’s right, it doesn’t. It includes their babies who are born here.

Jus soli.

 

[Darkwind]

Another ******* moron here...I guess better here than out there, shooting up jews.

The invaders are the adults

Birthright citizenship is for the people born here, as in just-born people, dumbass. It has nothing to do with adults who were not born here.

Birthright citizenship is for people born here of US citizens.

 

[Darkwind]

Amending it does not make it the "living document" the left claims it to be. They claim it can be interpreted differently because todays needs are different than they were yesterday.

Mark

Dumbshit.... it’s a living document because it can be changed.

In ONLY two ways and it can ONLY be amended, not changed.

Dumbshit, Amendments can, and do, include changes.

Oh look. Another dumb **** who doesn't understand the amendment process.

Color Me NOT surprised.

LOLOL

Moron, tell me again how amendments can’t change the Constitution...

AMENDMENT XII

Note: A portion of Article II, section 1 of the Constitution was superseded by the 12th amendment.​

Again, for those like you who have a disability to comprehend things....It does not change the Constitution. Too complex for you, I know.

Tell Me, do you still hear the lambs?

 

[Darkwind]

You don't need a constitutional amendment. There's nothing to repeal because birthright citizenship for children of illegal immmigrants does not exist in the constitution.

ENGLISH - can you read it?

Constitution states:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

It absolutely exists - DUH.

Read the whole thing numbnuts.

The question arises from the fact that illegals are NOT subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

Dumbass, Illegals, like just about everyone in the United States are ABSOLUTELY a subject to juristiction of the United States, the only ones who aren't are foreign diplomats.

An illegal can be prosecuted by the authorties of the United States - why? Because THEY'RE SUBJECT TO JURISTICTION.

A diplomat cannot be prosecuted by the authorities of the United States - why? because they aren't under our juristiciton (unless their country waives their immunity).

Invaders are NOT subject to jurisdiction mush-head.

Of course they are retard, just like everyone is in this coutry with exception of foreign diplomats.

Feckless, are you idiots, who run your mouth without knowing much of anything about the actual law.

Look at the imbicile insulting his betters. How amusing.

 

[Faun]

Ok go ahead and follow the REPEAL process Constitution provides for.

You don't need a constitutional amendment. There's nothing to repeal because birthright citizenship for children of illegal immmigrants does not exist in the constitution.

ENGLISH - can you read it?

Constitution states:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

It absolutely exists - DUH.

Read the whole thing numbnuts.

The question arises from the fact that illegals are NOT subject to the jurisdiction thereof. Illegals are subject to the jurisdiction of their home country. In order to have protections of this country, you must be a citizen and in good standing. Therefore any birth would not give birthright citizenship.

We'll see how this plays out in the courts, but Trump has the right to deport illegals and their offspring until challenged in court.

Read and learn...

§ 515.329 Person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; person subject to U.S. jurisdiction.

The terms person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and person subject to U.S. jurisdiction include:

(a) Any individual, wherever located, who is a citizen or resident of the United States;

(b) Any person within the United States as defined in § 515.330;

(c) Any corporation, partnership, association, or other organization organized under the laws of the United States or of any State, territory, possession, or district of the United States; and

(d) Any corporation, partnership, association, or other organization, wherever organized or doing business, that is owned or controlled by persons specified in paragraphs (a) or (c) of this section.

§ 515.330 Person within the United States.

(a) The term person within the United States, includes:

(1) Any person, wheresoever located, who is a resident of the United States;

(2) Any person actually within the United States;

(3) Any corporation, partnership, association, or other organization organized under the laws of the United States or of any State, territory, possession, or district of the United States; and

(4) Any corporation, partnership, association, or other organization, wherever organized or doing business, which is owned or controlled by any person or persons specified in paragraphs (a)(1) or (a)(3) of this section.​

 

[Faun]

Ok go ahead and follow the REPEAL process Constitution provides for.

You don't need a constitutional amendment. There's nothing to repeal because birthright citizenship for children of illegal immmigrants does not exist in the constitution.

ENGLISH - can you read it?

Constitution states:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

It absolutely exists - DUH.

Read the whole thing numbnuts.

The question arises from the fact that illegals are NOT subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

Dumbass, Illegals, like just about everyone in the United States are ABSOLUTELY a subject to juristiction of the United States, the only ones who aren't are foreign diplomats.

An illegal can be prosecuted by the authorties of the United States - why? Because THEY'RE SUBJECT TO JURISTICTION.

A diplomat cannot be prosecuted by the authorities of the United States - why? because they aren't under our juristiciton (unless their country waives their immunity).

Invaders are NOT subject to jurisdiction mush-head.

Oh? An illegal alien is not subject to our laws?