Trump the pro choice Prez

[whutTHEYsay]

What is wrong with you.

I oppose tyranny. Why don’t you?

 

[buttercup]

reproductive rights was settled law by the Supreme Court. Every fucking Republican justice nominee told the Senate they had respect for precedent.. There was no reason to make it law thru Congress.

Then, even if they did want to, they couldn’t because of the blue dogs

Didn't read past the dishonest term "reproductive rights."

This has been stated a million times, but one more time, slowly and clearly for you...

You ALREADY have the right to reproduce. Or the right to NOT reproduce.

Once a woman is pregnant, she has already reproduced.

Therefore abortion is not about "reproductive rights." That's a BS, purposely deceptive term. If you want to be honest, abortion is about "killing rights." And not that I want to get into a debate on this right now, but there is no such thing as the right to kill an innocent human being.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

nfbw 241021 Vttpcp00123

there is no such thing as the right to kill an innocent human being.

nfbw 241021 Vttpcp00123. The right exists in many states including red states Ohio. How do you explain a fact that exists in objective reality does not exist? Are you from another dimension?

BackAgain Jul’24 Srvwgo: Society doesn’t have to have a religious based reason to oppose the slaughter of helpless, defenseless and utterly innocent human life. bckgn 230714 09720

NotfooledbyW Jul’23 Vrvwgo: I place a value on human life when it exits the womb or is capable of exiting the womb with medical professionals assistance and survives. I am a rational theist who makes that decision based on the non-religious ideal that a woman should have autonomy over her own body. •¥•. You favor government depriving me of the freedom of conscience/religion thus defined. •¥¥•. My view is the majority view but that should not matter. .•¥¥¥•. nfbw 230724 Vrvwgo09730

nfbw 241021 Vttpcp00123

 

[buttercup]

The right exists in many states including red states Ohio. How do you explain a fact that exists in objective reality does not exist? Are you from another dimension?

BackAgain Jul’24 Stvwgo: Society doesn’t have to have a religious based reason to oppose the slaughter of helpless, defenseless and utterly innocent human life. bckgn 230714 09720

NotfooledbyW Jul’23 Vtvwgo: I place a value on human life when it exits the womb or is capable of exiting the womb with medical professionals assistance and survives. I am a rational theist who makes that decision based on the non-religious ideal that a woman should have autonomy over her own body. •¥•. You favor government depriving me of the freedom of conscience/religion thus defined. •¥¥•. My view is the majority view but that should not matter. .•¥¥¥•. nfbw 230724 Vrvwgo09730

#123

Let me put it this way. There's no TRUE right to kill an innocent person. No matter what any current law says.

 

[Robert W]

Let me put it this way. There's no TRUE right to kill an innocent person. No matter what any current law says.

Democrats allege the fetus is not an innocent person. I ask them, what crime has the innocent person in the woman done to her?

 

[Papageorgio]

I oppose tyranny. Why don’t you?

You can be a tranny, I don’t care but I don’t have to call them by their preferred pronouns and men competing in women’s sports is not right. People are free to be who they want to be and they aren’t hurting anyone.

 

[Rambunctious]

I oppose tyranny. Why don’t you?

Tyranny?... like when government tells you what kind of car you will buy and drive?... or how about what school you will attend or what public utility you must use?.... how about controlling who gets on a ballot and when that fails they create fake broken laws..... you are on the side of tyrannical want to be dictators and you are too brainwashed to see it.....