Trump tells supporters they're "PAST supporters" and "I don’t want their support anymore!"

[jc456]

It means everything in the court of public opinion.

Hell outside of the state of New York it means more than everything. Everybody understands what's taking place, nobody's being fooled by it and the only ones who have a sour opinion are the ones who always had a sour opinion.

I said from the outset this will end up at the United States supreme Court and that's exactly where it's heading. The state of New York won't be able to pull its legal shenanigans there.

In fact I'm quite certain that the extent of this illegitimate law fair was one of the big factors in Trump's reelection.

her entire testimony was made up. repeating a lie exactly is one of the hardest things to do. Her testimony had so many holes in it where one thing didn't back up another thing she said under oath. Under fking oath!!!!!

 

[justoffal]

There is no federal question.

There most certainly is.... Once every final appeal has been exhausted at the state supreme court level it is then qualifies as a SCOTUS case. You can hide your head under your pillow all you want.
That crazy ***** is never going to see a penny.

 

[justoffal]

her entire testimony was made up. repeating a lie exactly is one of the hardest things to do. Her testimony had so many holes in it where one thing didn't back up another thing she said under oath. Under fking oath!!!!!

I know.... I'm expecting that eventually the New York supreme Court will dissolve the entire thing.
If they don't then it can be appealed to the supreme Court of the United States.

 

[postman]

well it was a fact and not opinion. Read the final documents.

Actually from Trump's appeal, the courts judgement was Trump committed rape.

 

[jc456]

There most certainly is.... Once every final appeal has been exhausted at the state supreme court level it is then qualifies as a SCOTUS case. You can hide your head under your pillow all you want.
That crazy ***** is never going to see a penny.

 

[jc456]

Actually from Trump's appeal, the courts judgement was Trump committed rape.

no one cares what they had to say. SCOTUS will correct her lies quickly. post 205

 

[postman]

It means everything in the court of public opinion.

Hell outside of the state of New York it means more than everything. Everybody understands what's taking place, nobody's being fooled by it and the only ones who have a sour opinion are the ones who always had a sour opinion.

I said from the outset this will end up at the United States supreme Court and that's exactly where it's heading. The state of New York won't be able to pull its legal shenanigans there.

In fact I'm quite certain that the extent of this illegitimate law fair was one of the big factors in Trump's reelection.

As I said, there is no federal question.
Trump has been trying to get it to the federal courts for years, without success.

 

[jc456]

As I said, there is no federal question.
Trump has been trying to get it to the federal courts for years, without success.

post 205

 

[postman]

There most certainly is.... Once every final appeal has been exhausted at the state supreme court level it is then qualifies as a SCOTUS case. You can hide your head under your pillow all you want.
That crazy ***** is never going to see a penny.

It can only go to federal court is there is a federal question.
The federal court is supposed to give great deference to the state court system as to the interpretation and carrying out of their sovereign laws.

Only if those laws conflict with the Constitution or federal law, does it enter the jurisdiction of article 3 courts.

 

[postman]

no one cares what they had to say. SCOTUS will correct her lies quickly. post 205

And how is the supreme court to do that, when they can only rule on the law, and not the facts.

 

[postman]

her entire testimony was made up. repeating a lie exactly is one of the hardest things to do. Her testimony had so many holes in it where one thing didn't back up another thing she said under oath. Under fking oath!!!!!

That is for a state court to decide, not a federal court.

 

[justoffal]

It can only go to federal court is there is a federal question.
The federal court is supposed to give great deference to the state court system as to the interpretation and carrying out of their sovereign laws.

Only if those laws conflict with the Constitution or federal law, does it enter the jurisdiction of article 3 courts.

Mark my words.... The level of corruption apparent in all the kangaroo proceedings in New York state will definitely raise questions. I'm still waiting for the New York supreme Court to correct the entire thing because that's what I believe will happen.
If they don't it will almost certainly land in front of the scotus.

 

[jc456]

That is for a state court to decide, not a federal court.

any case can go to the SCOTUS

 

[justoffal]

That is for a state court to decide, not a federal court.

Not exactly.... Evidence of judicial misconduct can be an often has in the past set off federal investigations into state proceedings. I believe New York state leads the league in these investigations.

 

[jc456]

And how is the supreme court to do that, when they can only rule on the law, and not the facts.

you will see.

 

[justoffal]

you will see.

Construed facts represent a breakage of judicial law that's how. You don't get to lie your ass off, have it verified by a judge who doesn't give a shit and then have it stick as if it was the truth.

 

[postman]

Mark my words.... The level of corruption apparent in all the kangaroo proceedings in New York state will definitely raise questions. I'm still waiting for the New York supreme Court to correct the entire thing because that's what I believe will happen.
If they don't it will almost certainly land in front of the scotus.

The supreme court rules on law, not on facts. They are a court of very limited original jurisdiction (ex: 11th amendment)

 

[justoffal]

The supreme court rules on law, not on facts. They are a court of very limited original jurisdiction (ex: 11th amendment)

It is illegal to frame somebody with false facts.
That is a breakage of Federal judicial law.
It will end up in front of the supreme Court unless the New York supreme Court corrects this ridiculous circus that happened beneath its jurisdiction.

 

[postman]

any case can go to the SCOTUS

Only if there is a constitutional question, or conflict with federal law.

 

[JanetTheGreat]

Well, I'm definitely a past supporter then. I can't morally support someone who lies and gaslights his own followers, however, his policies themselves, I agree with, though there is some disagreement with the massive spending he has done.