BackAgain
Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Ignore the point. Typical of you."Did you direct him to do those actions."
That would lead nobody astray.
The innocent person would didn't do it says no. The criminal pleads the 5th.
No, you and your orange lard and master did not figure out a life hack, ya sniveling crybaby.
1. The transcript shows that he wasn’t just asked “yes/no” questions.
In any event. 2. Your idiotic analysis is even clearer evidence of the lack of value you place in the Constitution. It is unlikely that any contrary argument would have any chance of penetrating your skull.
But, just to be clear, the 5th Amendment does NOT require that you actually would be implicating yourself. It suffices if it “might tend to” incriminate you.
And with a kind of rogue prosecutor such as the highly politically-partisan and politically-driven hack of an AG up in NY, you’d have to be a dipshit moron NOT to be aware of how SHE “might” manipulate anything you say.
Oh well. Except for the fact that you were entirely wrong, that was a really insipid posting effort, Farty.