I'm a sheep? Sorry, who am I following?
Thank you, sir! I know we don't always agree. But I appreciate people who actually pay attention
A vote for Johnson is a vote for Hillary.
I'd just like one time what advantage there's ever been for voting for a guarantee loser third party candidate. Can someone explain what ever difference it's made. Ever change anything? Nope. Wasted vote, guaranteed.
So because a third party candidate hasn't won the presidency, none ever will, so don't bother?
With candidates as disliked at this year's presidential offerings from the big 2, it seems like the perfect time for people to try and look past that kind of thinking. Even just giving the major parties a scare and causing them to change their ways would be a victory.
I asked what value they've ever provided except guarantee a win for the dems. Ever!
Wait, are you now suggesting that only people who normally vote Republican vote third party?
If you want to continue with the ridiculous notion that anyone who votes for a third party candidate is helping one of the major party candidates, what about Ralph Nader? Plenty have said he cost Gore the presidency, that's not guaranteeing a win for Dems.
And how do you know that no changes have ever occurred due to strong third party showings? Perhaps George Wallace getting a number of electoral votes gave the major parties pause, perhaps Perot garnering 19% of the popular vote caused some reflection in party meetings, even some changes in strategy or proposed policy.
I'll repeat : Are you saying that because a third party candidate hasn't won the presidency, none ever will, so don't bother?