Trump states Minnesota woman “ran over” ICE agent before he shot her

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thanks for that, another video that clearly shows the officer being struck as the driver speeds away after ignoring multiple commands to get out of the car. Keep digging fool.
pknopp --- LOL, thanks for the Fake News emoji. It was your NBC news video link. Maybe you should pay attention to what you post--lying fool.
 
In none but the AI video's does he get hit let alone run over like Trump said.
Keep pushing that narrative, fool. There are too many videos from your leftist cronies that they released in their moronic rush to judgement that PROVE you wrong. Keep digging.
 
Well, if getting your earlobe nicked can count as “taking a bullet”, I guess getting bumped to the ground (and getting right back up) by a car going 5mph can count as “getting run over”
 
Yes. Trump misspoke. The lie is what the Minneapolis mayor is spreading.

NO ONE has claimed the woman ran him over with a car.

Because you don't need to actually run them over to commit the crime of turning your vehicle into a weapon. And contrary to what the clown says, you don't have to be seriously harmed in order to protect your own life.

I still can see why the left is protecting rapists, child molesters, fraudsters, and a host of other crimes and criminals.
She was not using her car as a weapon. You on the right have elected a rapist, child molester, fraudster, and a man who has committed many other crimes as the presient an you protect him.
 
Well, if getting your earlobe nicked can count as “taking a bullet”, I guess getting bumped to the ground (and getting right back up) by a car going 5mph can count as “getting run over”

He was never bumped to the ground.
 
Well, if getting your earlobe nicked can count as “taking a bullet”, I guess getting bumped to the ground (and getting right back up) by a car going 5mph can count as “getting run over”
Why don't you stand behind a podium and let someone nick your earlobe with a rifle from a hundred yards or so. Idiot.
 
15th post
That's true for both sides. Resign yourself to the fact this is a civil war. The democrat party is leading an insurrection.
It is not true for both sides, nor is the Democratic Party leading an insurrection. It's time you guys start learning the meaning of words. Protesting against unconstitutional acts by a tyrant is not an insurrection. This is not a civil war. It is a rebellion against a fascist, tyrannical administration.
 
It is not true for both sides, nor is the Democratic Party leading an insurrection. It's time you guys start learning the meaning of words. Protesting against unconstitutional acts by a tyrant is not an insurrection. This is not a civil war. It is a rebellion against a fascist, tyrannical administration.
Blocking roads and harassment isn't protesting, you dumb ****. It's a crime.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom