Trump smears E. Jean Carroll on social media while sitting in courtroom

[Crepitus]

Today, while sitting in the courtroom for his second defamation trial with the same individual, his social media accounts are posting defamatory posts about her.

How dumb do you have to be?

Trump smears E. Jean Carroll on social media while sitting in courtroom

Donald Trump dared a federal judge to hold him in contempt of court by having screenshots of his sex abuse victim E. Jean Carroll's smutty jokes on Twitter posted to his social media account as he sat in the courtroom.The former president was last year found liable for sexually abusing Carroll...

www.rawstory.com

 

[IM2]

Trump is about to pay some serious money.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Today, while sitting in the courtroom for his second defamation trial with the same individual, his social media accounts are posting defamatory posts about her.

How dumb do you have to be?

Trump smears E. Jean Carroll on social media while sitting in courtroom

Donald Trump dared a federal judge to hold him in contempt of court by having screenshots of his sex abuse victim E. Jean Carroll's smutty jokes on Twitter posted to his social media account as he sat in the courtroom.The former president was last year found liable for sexually abusing Carroll...

www.rawstory.com

Judge, take that dare.

 

[DGS49]

Keep in mind that TRUTH is an effective defense to a defamation charge.

She accused him of RAPING her. He called her a liar.

A MANHATTAN jury found that he was guilty of "sexual assault," which covers everything from an inadvertent feel to rape. The Judge was quoted falsely claiming that Trump was found to have raped the woman - for which he should be disbarred.

Anyway, if Trump is PERMITTED (in a Manhattan courtroom) to prove that he did not RAPE her, he could prevail. But it's a close case, where the judge could deny him the right to contest the facts because he was found guilty in a criminal trial.

No rational human believes that Donald Trump forcibly raped this unattractive woman in the dressing room of a department store. It doesn't pass the laugh test.

 

[AMart]

It's hilarious that leftist loser marxists think Trump raped that skank.

 

[Blaster]

That old lying bitch deserves to be trashed.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Keep in mind that TRUTH is an effective defense to a defamation charge.

She accused him of RAPING her. He called her a liar.

A MANHATTAN jury found that he was guilty of "sexual assault," which covers everything from an inadvertent feel to rape. The Judge was quoted falsely claiming that Trump was found to have raped the woman - for which he should be disbarred.

Anyway, if Trump is PERMITTED (in a Manhattan courtroom) to prove that he did not RAPE her, he could prevail. But it's a close case, where the judge could deny him the right to contest the facts because he was found guilty in a criminal trial.

No rational human believes that Donald Trump forcibly raped this unattractive woman in the dressing room of a department store. It doesn't pass the laugh test.

This isn't a close case, moron. It's over and done. For the record, I believe the orange bag O' shit raped her.

 

[Blaster]

For the record, I believe the orange bag O' shit raped her.

Yuck

 

[otto105]

Keep in mind that TRUTH is an effective defense to a defamation charge.

She accused him of RAPING her. He called her a liar.

A MANHATTAN jury found that he was guilty of "sexual assault," which covers everything from an inadvertent feel to rape. The Judge was quoted falsely claiming that Trump was found to have raped the woman - for which he should be disbarred.

Anyway, if Trump is PERMITTED (in a Manhattan courtroom) to prove that he did not RAPE her, he could prevail. But it's a close case, where the judge could deny him the right to contest the facts because he was found guilty in a criminal trial.

No rational human believes that Donald Trump forcibly raped this unattractive woman in the dressing room of a department store. It doesn't pass the laugh test.

For clarity fuckup I offer this from the first judgement.

 

[Hellokitty]

Today, while sitting in the courtroom for his second defamation trial with the same individual, his social media accounts are posting defamatory posts about her.

How dumb do you have to be?

Trump smears E. Jean Carroll on social media while sitting in courtroom

Donald Trump dared a federal judge to hold him in contempt of court by having screenshots of his sex abuse victim E. Jean Carroll's smutty jokes on Twitter posted to his social media account as he sat in the courtroom.The former president was last year found liable for sexually abusing Carroll...

www.rawstory.com

Sounds like the post are things Carroll has said in the past. Liberal women want to dress up as vaginas and attack women of faith so I have no issue with TRUMP degrading her using her own words.

 

[airplanemechanic]

For clarity fuckup I offer this from the first judgement.

View attachment 888918

Funny how a civil trial (with a much lower preponderance of evidence) can find someone guilty of a criminal offense that requires a much higher guilty beyond any and all reasonable doubt.

Just FYI "sexual abuse" is not civil.

 

[Lord Long Rod]

I would have done the same thing. I can just look at that stupid fucking nut and know she is crazy.

 

[Crepitus]

Keep in mind that TRUTH is an effective defense to a defamation charge.

She accused him of RAPING her. He called her a liar.

A MANHATTAN jury found that he was guilty of "sexual assault," which covers everything from an inadvertent feel to rape. The Judge was quoted falsely claiming that Trump was found to have raped the woman - for which he should be disbarred.

Anyway, if Trump is PERMITTED (in a Manhattan courtroom) to prove that he did not RAPE her, he could prevail. But it's a close case, where the judge could deny him the right to contest the facts because he was found guilty in a criminal trial.

No rational human believes that Donald Trump forcibly raped this unattractive woman in the dressing room of a department store. It doesn't pass the laugh test.

Dude, he already lost this trial. This is to decide damages.

Which almost certainly just went up.

Again.

 

[Crepitus]

It's hilarious that leftist loser marxists think Trump raped that skank.

That's nice kid.

How about that judge?

 

[Crepitus]

This isn't a close case, moron. It's over and done. For the record, I believe the orange bag O' shit raped her.

Everyone with half a brain or more knows he did.

 

[drudge X]

Why did leftists give Biden a pass for fingering Reade?

 

[Superbadbrutha]

I wonder how many of these Trump Humpers would feel that way, if that were their mother, sister, daughter, cousin, etc.

 

[Crepitus]

Why did leftists give Biden a pass for fingering Reade?

Nobody has given anyone a "pass". You kids have never managed to back up any of your made up accusations.

It's like the whole voter fraud thing all over again, what was it Rudy said?

Oh yeah, "we have lots of accusations, we just don't have any evidence".

 

[Zincwarrior]

Keep in mind that TRUTH is an effective defense to a defamation charge.

She accused him of RAPING her. He called her a liar.

A MANHATTAN jury found that he was guilty of "sexual assault," which covers everything from an inadvertent feel to rape. The Judge was quoted falsely claiming that Trump was found to have raped the woman - for which he should be disbarred.

Anyway, if Trump is PERMITTED (in a Manhattan courtroom) to prove that he did not RAPE her, he could prevail. But it's a close case, where the judge could deny him the right to contest the facts because he was found guilty in a criminal trial.

No rational human believes that Donald Trump forcibly raped this unattractive woman in the dressing room of a department store. It doesn't pass the laugh test.

We definitely believe Mr. Grab em by the pussy did. He needs to hurry up and die. Everything is falling ap apart around him. His dad's business empire will be dissolved on the 31st.

 

[otto105]

Sounds like the post are things Carroll has said in the past. Liberal women want to dress up as vaginas and attack women of faith so I have no issue with TRUMP degrading her using her own words.

You read as an idiot.

Good job if you were aiming for that.