- Banned
- #21
What do you have against truth that makes you use the word disparagingly?And the Truther dipshittery begins anew!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What do you have against truth that makes you use the word disparagingly?And the Truther dipshittery begins anew!
Where do you get your information?He's not smart enough to even know what SETI is.
Post a linkI get mine from the Federal Network
MSM- known liars- got it-Where do I get my information? A myriad of places. I watch a little FOX news (to find out the conservative talking points), a bit of CNN, and MSNBC.
Good satire has elements of the truth – and it’s certainly true that Trump would love nothing more than to use the military to silence the press, remain in power, and establish an authoritarian dictatorship."We can't let them steal our election."
View attachment 427126
What do you have against truth that makes you use the word disparagingly?And the Truther dipshittery begins anew!
Apparently you don't like the truth? Correct? Unless it comes from an official source, no matter that the source(s) have an agenda- got it.Oh, "Truther" and "Truth" have nothing to do with each other.
Apparently you don't like the truth? Correct? Unless it comes from an official source, no matter that the source(s) have an agenda- got it.Oh, "Truther" and "Truth" have nothing to do with each other.
You, sir, are a liar. Period.Alas, 'Truthers' have nothing to do with it.
Post a linkI get mine from the Federal Network
You're as clueless as they are.Good satire has elements of the truth – and it’s certainly true that Trump would love nothing more than to use the military to silence the press, remain in power, and establish an authoritarian dictatorship."We can't let them steal our election."
View attachment 427126
Post a linkI get mine from the Federal Network
I think we must differentiate between "facts" and "truth."Apparently you don't like the truth? Correct? Unless it comes from an official source, no matter that the source(s) have an agenda- got it.Oh, "Truther" and "Truth" have nothing to do with each other.
Truth is great. Alas, 'Truthers' have nothing to do with it.
I think we must differentiate between "facts" and "truth."Apparently you don't like the truth? Correct? Unless it comes from an official source, no matter that the source(s) have an agenda- got it.Oh, "Truther" and "Truth" have nothing to do with each other.
Truth is great. Alas, 'Truthers' have nothing to do with it.
One person's "truth," is another person's "conspiracy theory," though they may both be based on the same facts, yet they be wildly interpreted differently.
Post a linkI get mine from the Federal Network
That's what I figured- 0, zilch, nada
No, what you are, is devoid of anything but the position that science can solve all questions, and it is the final arbitrator of truth, which, it is not.I think we must differentiate between "facts" and "truth."Apparently you don't like the truth? Correct? Unless it comes from an official source, no matter that the source(s) have an agenda- got it.Oh, "Truther" and "Truth" have nothing to do with each other.
Truth is great. Alas, 'Truthers' have nothing to do with it.
One person's "truth," is another person's "conspiracy theory," though they may both be based on the same facts, yet they be wildly interpreted differently.
I'm more partial to the 'in accordance with fact or reality' kind of Truth.
And in that, Truthers are sorely lacking.
No, what you are, is devoid of anything but the position that science can solve all questions, and it is the final arbitrator of truth, which, it is not.I think we must differentiate between "facts" and "truth."Apparently you don't like the truth? Correct? Unless it comes from an official source, no matter that the source(s) have an agenda- got it.Oh, "Truther" and "Truth" have nothing to do with each other.
Truth is great. Alas, 'Truthers' have nothing to do with it.
One person's "truth," is another person's "conspiracy theory," though they may both be based on the same facts, yet they be wildly interpreted differently.
I'm more partial to the 'in accordance with fact or reality' kind of Truth.
And in that, Truthers are sorely lacking.
The default position you assume, is the only path to "truth" is through "logical positivism," which, of course, is a fallacy. You cannot disregard the philosophical outlook of the entire rest of, not only western civilization, but also eastern civilization, just because they do not share your POV on truth.
Don't be absurd.