Trump Seeks Permission to Hire Foreign Workers---WORST P-E-OTUS EVER

[Luddly Neddite]

Prove it's a lie, dupe. Or STFU.

I didn't claim it was a lie. My point is that it doesn't prove anything.


THat a business that has some undefined relationship with Donald Trump is filing a request to use imported migrant farm workers does not prove that Trump is not serious about his immigration platform.

It's his vineyard. And you're just as big a hypocrite as he is.

1. Just because it has his name on it, does not mean it is his. He has made a business asset of his personal brand. Funny you managed to miss that.

2. Even if he owns a significant portion of the farm, that doesn't mean he is personally in CHARGE of it.

3. Even if he is in charge of it at this point in time, he has not specified that migrant farm work is going to be banned under his new policy.

4. "Hypocrite"? So, you are arguing that if he uses immigrant labor and then bans the future use of immigrant labor that that is hypocritical of him?

If so, that means that we were NOT fooled. We still get the policy we want.

When you have to go on and on, it's because you lost, loser.

4 bullet points is hardly gong on and on.

Your response challenged none of my points, thus they all stand.



1. Just because it has his name on it, does not mean it is his. He has made a business asset of his personal brand. Funny you managed to miss that.

2. Even if he owns a significant portion of the farm, that doesn't mean he is personally in CHARGE of it.

3. Even if he is in charge of it at this point in time, he has not specified that migrant farm work is going to be banned under his new policy.

4. "Hypocrite"? So, you are arguing that if he uses immigrant labor and then bans the future use of immigrant labor that that is hypocritical of him?

If so, that means that we were NOT fooled. We still get the policy we want

1. Just because it has his name on it, does not mean it is his.

Novel defense.

I would not put my name on anything I was not ready to take responsibility for. But then, I'm not a lying trump.

 

[Chuz Life]

Why else do those type visas exist, if they are not for opportunities such as this?

Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[Luddly Neddite]

When Mexico whipped his fat ass. What a hot mess he is.

 

[depotoo]

Backed down from what? He isn't even sworn in yet. You have no idea what will transpire, what leverage he may use.

What a bunch of douchebags these Trumps are:

Trump vineyard seeks Labor Department approval to hire foreign workers
Trump vineyard seeks Labor Department approval to hire foreign workers

Uday Hussein Trump shown here in VA vineyard. Qusay Hussein Trump runs the office.

""""Federal ethics experts for former Democratic and Republican administrations warned Thursday that President-elect Donald Trump is creating a major conflict of interest by allowing his Virginia vineyard to seek special temporary visas for foreign workers.

Trump, who is president of the Charlottesville vineyard that applied this month for H2 visas for six foreign workers, will soon run the U.S. government, which determines whether to grant those visas.

“This is a powerful example of why Donald Trump needs to make a definitive break, not just with his operational interests but his ownership interests, by appointing an independent trustee to liquidate all that,” said Norm Eisen, a visiting fellow at the Brookings Institution who was chief White House ethics lawyer for President Obama from 2009 to 2011.

He called the situation “a classic conflict of interest.”

What is the normal approval rate for these requests?

And? O let millions come through illegally. Trump is actually asking for permission. O didnt.

Lies.

Not surprised that the RWNJ traitors are in favor of hiring illegals and foreigners.

Morons.

Actual picking of farm produces is such a crap job, that it is one that I am willing to see done by imported Third World labor, provided they get shipped back out afterwards, and never become citizens or get the right to vote.


BUT, it is a tiny percentage of the immigration issue.

BUILD THE WALL.

Won't happen. He already backed down from Mexico's president.

with a bobby pin in his hair !!!!
and TAPED tie !!!!

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Why else do those type visas exist, if they are not for opportunities such as this?

Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Its the constant lies and hypocrisy from the trumps. If you haven't yet seen it, look at the link in my sig.

 

[Correll]

I didn't claim it was a lie. My point is that it doesn't prove anything.


THat a business that has some undefined relationship with Donald Trump is filing a request to use imported migrant farm workers does not prove that Trump is not serious about his immigration platform.

It's his vineyard. And you're just as big a hypocrite as he is.

1. Just because it has his name on it, does not mean it is his. He has made a business asset of his personal brand. Funny you managed to miss that.

2. Even if he owns a significant portion of the farm, that doesn't mean he is personally in CHARGE of it.

3. Even if he is in charge of it at this point in time, he has not specified that migrant farm work is going to be banned under his new policy.

4. "Hypocrite"? So, you are arguing that if he uses immigrant labor and then bans the future use of immigrant labor that that is hypocritical of him?

If so, that means that we were NOT fooled. We still get the policy we want.

When you have to go on and on, it's because you lost, loser.

4 bullet points is hardly gong on and on.

Your response challenged none of my points, thus they all stand.



1. Just because it has his name on it, does not mean it is his. He has made a business asset of his personal brand. Funny you managed to miss that.

2. Even if he owns a significant portion of the farm, that doesn't mean he is personally in CHARGE of it.

3. Even if he is in charge of it at this point in time, he has not specified that migrant farm work is going to be banned under his new policy.

4. "Hypocrite"? So, you are arguing that if he uses immigrant labor and then bans the future use of immigrant labor that that is hypocritical of him?

If so, that means that we were NOT fooled. We still get the policy we want

1. Just because it has his name on it, does not mean it is his.

Novel defense.

I would not put my name on anything I was not ready to take responsibility for. But then, I'm not a lying trump.

Branding normally isn't considered lying. MOst consumers are sophisticated enough to understand that.

Do you realize that Walt Disney is not in charge of his company anymore?

 

[Correll]

Why else do those type visas exist, if they are not for opportunities such as this?

Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Its the constant lies and hypocrisy from the trumps. If you haven't yet seen it, look at the link in my sig.

So which is it? LIes are hypocrisy?

Is he "LYING" about his plans for immigration,

or is he being a "hypocrite"?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

What a bunch of douchebags these Trumps are:

Trump vineyard seeks Labor Department approval to hire foreign workers
Trump vineyard seeks Labor Department approval to hire foreign workers

Uday Hussein Trump shown here in VA vineyard. Qusay Hussein Trump runs the office.

""""Federal ethics experts for former Democratic and Republican administrations warned Thursday that President-elect Donald Trump is creating a major conflict of interest by allowing his Virginia vineyard to seek special temporary visas for foreign workers.

Trump, who is president of the Charlottesville vineyard that applied this month for H2 visas for six foreign workers, will soon run the U.S. government, which determines whether to grant those visas.

“This is a powerful example of why Donald Trump needs to make a definitive break, not just with his operational interests but his ownership interests, by appointing an independent trustee to liquidate all that,” said Norm Eisen, a visiting fellow at the Brookings Institution who was chief White House ethics lawyer for President Obama from 2009 to 2011.

He called the situation “a classic conflict of interest.”

Why you want a job pruning trees?

.

DAY-UM.

You RWNJ traitors have been yammering for years about how you don't want illegals and foreigners getting American jobs. All these lying flip-flops are gonna give you whip lash.

 

[Correll]

What a bunch of douchebags these Trumps are:

Trump vineyard seeks Labor Department approval to hire foreign workers
Trump vineyard seeks Labor Department approval to hire foreign workers

Uday Hussein Trump shown here in VA vineyard. Qusay Hussein Trump runs the office.

""""Federal ethics experts for former Democratic and Republican administrations warned Thursday that President-elect Donald Trump is creating a major conflict of interest by allowing his Virginia vineyard to seek special temporary visas for foreign workers.

Trump, who is president of the Charlottesville vineyard that applied this month for H2 visas for six foreign workers, will soon run the U.S. government, which determines whether to grant those visas.

“This is a powerful example of why Donald Trump needs to make a definitive break, not just with his operational interests but his ownership interests, by appointing an independent trustee to liquidate all that,” said Norm Eisen, a visiting fellow at the Brookings Institution who was chief White House ethics lawyer for President Obama from 2009 to 2011.

He called the situation “a classic conflict of interest.”

Why you want a job pruning trees?

.

DAY-UM.

You RWNJ traitors have been yammering for years about how you don't want illegals and foreigners getting American jobs. All these lying flip-flops are gonna give you whip lash.

Migrant farm labor is ONE that I am willing to be "generous" with.

As I have always said.

 

[PredFan]

What a bunch of douchebags these Trumps are:

Trump vineyard seeks Labor Department approval to hire foreign workers
Trump vineyard seeks Labor Department approval to hire foreign workers

Uday Hussein Trump shown here in VA vineyard. Qusay Hussein Trump runs the office.

""""Federal ethics experts for former Democratic and Republican administrations warned Thursday that President-elect Donald Trump is creating a major conflict of interest by allowing his Virginia vineyard to seek special temporary visas for foreign workers.

Trump, who is president of the Charlottesville vineyard that applied this month for H2 visas for six foreign workers, will soon run the U.S. government, which determines whether to grant those visas.

“This is a powerful example of why Donald Trump needs to make a definitive break, not just with his operational interests but his ownership interests, by appointing an independent trustee to liquidate all that,” said Norm Eisen, a visiting fellow at the Brookings Institution who was chief White House ethics lawyer for President Obama from 2009 to 2011.

He called the situation “a classic conflict of interest.”

 

[Chuz Life]

Why else do those type visas exist, if they are not for opportunities such as this?

Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Its the constant lies and hypocrisy from the trumps. If you haven't yet seen it, look at the link in my sig.

So which is it? LIes are hypocrisy?

Is he "LYING" about his plans for immigration,

or is he being a "hypocrite"?

It's neither.

Trump never indicated that he has any qualms or issues with any forms of LEGAL immigration. But I don't really expect any leftardz to acknowledge that fact.

Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[Wyatt earp]

I didn't claim it was a lie. My point is that it doesn't prove anything.


THat a business that has some undefined relationship with Donald Trump is filing a request to use imported migrant farm workers does not prove that Trump is not serious about his immigration platform.

It's his vineyard. And you're just as big a hypocrite as he is.

1. Just because it has his name on it, does not mean it is his. He has made a business asset of his personal brand. Funny you managed to miss that.

2. Even if he owns a significant portion of the farm, that doesn't mean he is personally in CHARGE of it.

3. Even if he is in charge of it at this point in time, he has not specified that migrant farm work is going to be banned under his new policy.

4. "Hypocrite"? So, you are arguing that if he uses immigrant labor and then bans the future use of immigrant labor that that is hypocritical of him?

If so, that means that we were NOT fooled. We still get the policy we want.

When you have to go on and on, it's because you lost, loser.

4 bullet points is hardly gong on and on.

Your response challenged none of my points, thus they all stand.



1. Just because it has his name on it, does not mean it is his. He has made a business asset of his personal brand. Funny you managed to miss that.

2. Even if he owns a significant portion of the farm, that doesn't mean he is personally in CHARGE of it.

3. Even if he is in charge of it at this point in time, he has not specified that migrant farm work is going to be banned under his new policy.

4. "Hypocrite"? So, you are arguing that if he uses immigrant labor and then bans the future use of immigrant labor that that is hypocritical of him?

If so, that means that we were NOT fooled. We still get the policy we want

1. Just because it has his name on it, does not mean it is his.

Novel defense.

I would not put my name on anything I was not ready to take responsibility for. But then, I'm not a lying trump.

It's not a defense... You have no clue how the upper class lives do you?

or you have typical liberal amnesia and forgot about Kathy lee



Charles Kernaghan, head of the National Labor Committee, criticized Gifford for not living up to her promise to end sweatshopconditions at factories that make her clothing. "Kathie Lee Gifford is a celebrity, a very influential and powerful person," he said.Sep 22, 1999
Kathie Lee's Latest Sweatshop Scandal | E! News
m.eonline.com › news › kathie-lee-s-lates...

Feedback

 

[Wyatt earp]

When Mexico whipped his fat ass. What a hot mess he is.

When was that or another liberal fantasy dream of yours?


.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Prove it's a lie, dupe. Or STFU.

I didn't claim it was a lie. My point is that it doesn't prove anything.


THat a business that has some undefined relationship with Donald Trump is filing a request to use imported migrant farm workers does not prove that Trump is not serious about his immigration platform.

It's his vineyard. And you're just as big a hypocrite as he is.

1. Just because it has his name on it, does not mean it is his. He has made a business asset of his personal brand. Funny you managed to miss that.

2. Even if he owns a significant portion of the farm, that doesn't mean he is personally in CHARGE of it.

3. Even if he is in charge of it at this point in time, he has not specified that migrant farm work is going to be banned under his new policy.

4. "Hypocrite"? So, you are arguing that if he uses immigrant labor and then bans the future use of immigrant labor that that is hypocritical of him?

If so, that means that we were NOT fooled. We still get the policy we want.

When you have to go on and on, it's because you lost, loser.

4 bullet points is hardly gong on and on.

Your response challenged none of my points, thus they all stand.



1. Just because it has his name on it, does not mean it is his. He has made a business asset of his personal brand. Funny you managed to miss that.

2. Even if he owns a significant portion of the farm, that doesn't mean he is personally in CHARGE of it.

3. Even if he is in charge of it at this point in time, he has not specified that migrant farm work is going to be banned under his new policy.

4. "Hypocrite"? So, you are arguing that if he uses immigrant labor and then bans the future use of immigrant labor that that is hypocritical of him?

If so, that means that we were NOT fooled. We still get the policy we want

So you continue to go on and on. Looks like you got the Godwin sans the Hitler comment, idiot.

 

[Correll]

I didn't claim it was a lie. My point is that it doesn't prove anything.


THat a business that has some undefined relationship with Donald Trump is filing a request to use imported migrant farm workers does not prove that Trump is not serious about his immigration platform.

It's his vineyard. And you're just as big a hypocrite as he is.

1. Just because it has his name on it, does not mean it is his. He has made a business asset of his personal brand. Funny you managed to miss that.

2. Even if he owns a significant portion of the farm, that doesn't mean he is personally in CHARGE of it.

3. Even if he is in charge of it at this point in time, he has not specified that migrant farm work is going to be banned under his new policy.

4. "Hypocrite"? So, you are arguing that if he uses immigrant labor and then bans the future use of immigrant labor that that is hypocritical of him?

If so, that means that we were NOT fooled. We still get the policy we want.

When you have to go on and on, it's because you lost, loser.

4 bullet points is hardly gong on and on.

Your response challenged none of my points, thus they all stand.



1. Just because it has his name on it, does not mean it is his. He has made a business asset of his personal brand. Funny you managed to miss that.

2. Even if he owns a significant portion of the farm, that doesn't mean he is personally in CHARGE of it.

3. Even if he is in charge of it at this point in time, he has not specified that migrant farm work is going to be banned under his new policy.

4. "Hypocrite"? So, you are arguing that if he uses immigrant labor and then bans the future use of immigrant labor that that is hypocritical of him?

If so, that means that we were NOT fooled. We still get the policy we want

So you continue to go on and on. Looks like you got the Godwin sans the Hitler comment, idiot.

I acknowledge that you have given up making the case for you position on this issue.

My points stand, as the last word you were unable to challenge. At all.



Are you prepared to admit it, if Trump's policy lead to better jobs and higher wages?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Holy shit...You republican "America Firsters" are defending hiring foreign workers now to do jobs Americans can do?

Whats next?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Make America Grape Again

...with Foreign labor

 

[Correll]

Holy shit...You republican "America Firsters" are defending hiring foreign workers now to do jobs Americans can do?

Whats next?

You reek of dishonesty.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Holy shit...You republican "America Firsters" are defending hiring foreign workers now to do jobs Americans can do?

Whats next?

You reek of dishonesty.

Deflection...What else will you defend for Trump?

Hell, I think the better question is what wont you defend?

 

[Dschrute3]

Why would this upset an Open Borders Communist wanker? Seems like desperate petty hate to me. I'm pretty sure Trump's gonna be the scapegoat for everything wrong in these hateful folks' pathetic lives.

They're gonna concoct phony Trump 'scandals' 24/7-365. They believe that will degrade his ability to lead and win re-election. It's Un-American sabotage. But i doubt it's gonna work. I think the more they hate, the easier he'll win next time around.