Trump Says Roger Stone Has a Good Chance of Exoneration.

[Rambunctious]

It matters not. Threaten a witness gearing up to testify and you risk going to prison for witness tampering

Stone threatened no one...he called a friend of his that happened to be a potential witness...

 

[colfax_m]

No one in Congress is allowed to lie under oath

Except the dirty dems....

Who is to blame for Roger Stone getting indicted for lying, other than Roger Stone?

 

[Rambunctious]

Who is to blame for Roger Stone getting indicted for lying, other than Roger Stone?

Did he lie or misspeak...did he tell an untruth or was he mistaken?.....you don't even know....none of us do....he was railroaded just like Flynn...

 

[colfax_m]

Who is to blame for Roger Stone getting indicted for lying, other than Roger Stone?

Did he lie or misspeak...did he tell an untruth or was he mistaken?.....you don't even know....none of us do....he was railroaded just like Flynn...

That's an excellent point. Proving a lie isn't the easiest thing in the world. Lying and misspeaking are different.

How do we know Stone lied? Look at the pattern of behavior and the volume of the lies. For instance, is it credible that after many discussions with Jerome Corsi that he totally forgot they occurred? Not especially. Is it credible that he forgot the dozens and dozens of text messages and emails he sent to Credico? Not especially. He claimed he communicated exclusively by phone with these people and had no documents about anything.

This was a means by which he minimized his contact and his search for information of unreleased hacked emails. Based on the messages discovered, it was extremely easy to determine he was knowingly and willfully lying.

That's not really the case with few if any of the other people that you or the Trump supporters as a whole have been accusing of lying under oath. That's why Stone is indicted and others aren't.

 

[Rambunctious]

Who is to blame for Roger Stone getting indicted for lying, other than Roger Stone?

Did he lie or misspeak...did he tell an untruth or was he mistaken?.....you don't even know....none of us do....he was railroaded just like Flynn...

That's an excellent point. Proving a lie isn't the easiest thing in the world. Lying and misspeaking are different.

How do we know Stone lied? Look at the pattern of behavior and the volume of the lies. For instance, is it credible that after many discussions with Jerome Corsi that he totally forgot they occurred? Not especially. Is it credible that he forgot the dozens and dozens of text messages and emails he sent to Credico? Not especially. He claimed he communicated exclusively by phone with these people and had no documents about anything.

This was a means by which he minimized his contact and his search for information of unreleased hacked emails. Based on the messages discovered, it was extremely easy to determine he was knowingly and willfully lying.

That's not really the case with few if any of the other people that you or the Trump supporters as a whole have been accusing of lying under oath. That's why Stone is indicted and others aren't.

He deserves a fair and unbiased jury...and he didn't have one....he shouldn't be under assault just because he is a FOT...friend of Trump....

 

[colfax_m]

Who is to blame for Roger Stone getting indicted for lying, other than Roger Stone?

Did he lie or misspeak...did he tell an untruth or was he mistaken?.....you don't even know....none of us do....he was railroaded just like Flynn...

That's an excellent point. Proving a lie isn't the easiest thing in the world. Lying and misspeaking are different.

How do we know Stone lied? Look at the pattern of behavior and the volume of the lies. For instance, is it credible that after many discussions with Jerome Corsi that he totally forgot they occurred? Not especially. Is it credible that he forgot the dozens and dozens of text messages and emails he sent to Credico? Not especially. He claimed he communicated exclusively by phone with these people and had no documents about anything.

This was a means by which he minimized his contact and his search for information of unreleased hacked emails. Based on the messages discovered, it was extremely easy to determine he was knowingly and willfully lying.

That's not really the case with few if any of the other people that you or the Trump supporters as a whole have been accusing of lying under oath. That's why Stone is indicted and others aren't.

He deserves a fair and unbiased jury...and he didn't have one....he shouldn't be under assault just because he is a FOT...friend of Trump....

He isn't under assault because he's a friend of Trump. He's under assault because he's committed felonies.

 

[Rambunctious]

Who is to blame for Roger Stone getting indicted for lying, other than Roger Stone?

Did he lie or misspeak...did he tell an untruth or was he mistaken?.....you don't even know....none of us do....he was railroaded just like Flynn...

That's an excellent point. Proving a lie isn't the easiest thing in the world. Lying and misspeaking are different.

How do we know Stone lied? Look at the pattern of behavior and the volume of the lies. For instance, is it credible that after many discussions with Jerome Corsi that he totally forgot they occurred? Not especially. Is it credible that he forgot the dozens and dozens of text messages and emails he sent to Credico? Not especially. He claimed he communicated exclusively by phone with these people and had no documents about anything.

This was a means by which he minimized his contact and his search for information of unreleased hacked emails. Based on the messages discovered, it was extremely easy to determine he was knowingly and willfully lying.

That's not really the case with few if any of the other people that you or the Trump supporters as a whole have been accusing of lying under oath. That's why Stone is indicted and others aren't.

He deserves a fair and unbiased jury...and he didn't have one....he shouldn't be under assault just because he is a FOT...friend of Trump....

He isn't under assault because he's a friend of Trump. He's under assault because he's committed felonies.

After being caught up in a phony Russia/Trump election tampering investigation....

 

[colfax_m]

Who is to blame for Roger Stone getting indicted for lying, other than Roger Stone?

Did he lie or misspeak...did he tell an untruth or was he mistaken?.....you don't even know....none of us do....he was railroaded just like Flynn...

That's an excellent point. Proving a lie isn't the easiest thing in the world. Lying and misspeaking are different.

How do we know Stone lied? Look at the pattern of behavior and the volume of the lies. For instance, is it credible that after many discussions with Jerome Corsi that he totally forgot they occurred? Not especially. Is it credible that he forgot the dozens and dozens of text messages and emails he sent to Credico? Not especially. He claimed he communicated exclusively by phone with these people and had no documents about anything.

This was a means by which he minimized his contact and his search for information of unreleased hacked emails. Based on the messages discovered, it was extremely easy to determine he was knowingly and willfully lying.

That's not really the case with few if any of the other people that you or the Trump supporters as a whole have been accusing of lying under oath. That's why Stone is indicted and others aren't.

He deserves a fair and unbiased jury...and he didn't have one....he shouldn't be under assault just because he is a FOT...friend of Trump....

He isn't under assault because he's a friend of Trump. He's under assault because he's committed felonies.

After being caught up in a phony Russia/Trump election tampering investigation....

He inserted himself into it. He was the one who was chasing down these illegally hacked emails and making public statements. Obviously he was going to be questioned about what he knows.

 

[Rambunctious]

Did he lie or misspeak...did he tell an untruth or was he mistaken?.....you don't even know....none of us do....he was railroaded just like Flynn...

That's an excellent point. Proving a lie isn't the easiest thing in the world. Lying and misspeaking are different.

How do we know Stone lied? Look at the pattern of behavior and the volume of the lies. For instance, is it credible that after many discussions with Jerome Corsi that he totally forgot they occurred? Not especially. Is it credible that he forgot the dozens and dozens of text messages and emails he sent to Credico? Not especially. He claimed he communicated exclusively by phone with these people and had no documents about anything.

This was a means by which he minimized his contact and his search for information of unreleased hacked emails. Based on the messages discovered, it was extremely easy to determine he was knowingly and willfully lying.

That's not really the case with few if any of the other people that you or the Trump supporters as a whole have been accusing of lying under oath. That's why Stone is indicted and others aren't.

He deserves a fair and unbiased jury...and he didn't have one....he shouldn't be under assault just because he is a FOT...friend of Trump....

He isn't under assault because he's a friend of Trump. He's under assault because he's committed felonies.

After being caught up in a phony Russia/Trump election tampering investigation....

He inserted himself into it. He was the one who was chasing down these illegally hacked emails and making public statements. Obviously he was going to be questioned about what he knows.

The Trump team and Trump himself treated the emails and wikilinks as a joke...but they learned fast that angry dems can and will turn your little joke into an impeachable offense....

 

[colfax_m]

That's an excellent point. Proving a lie isn't the easiest thing in the world. Lying and misspeaking are different.

How do we know Stone lied? Look at the pattern of behavior and the volume of the lies. For instance, is it credible that after many discussions with Jerome Corsi that he totally forgot they occurred? Not especially. Is it credible that he forgot the dozens and dozens of text messages and emails he sent to Credico? Not especially. He claimed he communicated exclusively by phone with these people and had no documents about anything.

This was a means by which he minimized his contact and his search for information of unreleased hacked emails. Based on the messages discovered, it was extremely easy to determine he was knowingly and willfully lying.

That's not really the case with few if any of the other people that you or the Trump supporters as a whole have been accusing of lying under oath. That's why Stone is indicted and others aren't.

He deserves a fair and unbiased jury...and he didn't have one....he shouldn't be under assault just because he is a FOT...friend of Trump....

He isn't under assault because he's a friend of Trump. He's under assault because he's committed felonies.

After being caught up in a phony Russia/Trump election tampering investigation....

He inserted himself into it. He was the one who was chasing down these illegally hacked emails and making public statements. Obviously he was going to be questioned about what he knows.

The Trump team and Trump himself treated the emails and wikilinks as a joke...but they learned fast that angry dems can and will turn your little joke into an impeachable offense....

What makes you say that?

 

[Rambunctious]

He deserves a fair and unbiased jury...and he didn't have one....he shouldn't be under assault just because he is a FOT...friend of Trump....

He isn't under assault because he's a friend of Trump. He's under assault because he's committed felonies.

After being caught up in a phony Russia/Trump election tampering investigation....

He inserted himself into it. He was the one who was chasing down these illegally hacked emails and making public statements. Obviously he was going to be questioned about what he knows.

The Trump team and Trump himself treated the emails and wikilinks as a joke...but they learned fast that angry dems can and will turn your little joke into an impeachable offense....

What makes you say that?

When Trump asked Russia to see if they could find Hillary's emails because the media and the FBI couldn't or wouldn't he was joking...the left went bonkers....it was a freaking joke that started the whole damn thing....a crack in the door for the evil dems and the deep state to enter....

 

[beautress]

The lead juror misled the court to get a spot on the jury....how can anyone deny he is due a new trial?...The evil and angry lib media are salivating over an innocent man being sent to prison...someone has to stand for justice in this case...

The defense picked her just so they had a go-to in the end. Absolutely.

Where did you hear that?.....she even wiped her social media accounts to hide her true hate Trump feelings....

Ewwwww. That's obstruction isn't it? She could be disbarred for that.

No, it’s not obstruction. Don’t be absurd.

It is when Donald Trump tweets. That was absurd. So you're a first timer at politics. /snicker

 

[colfax_m]

He isn't under assault because he's a friend of Trump. He's under assault because he's committed felonies.

After being caught up in a phony Russia/Trump election tampering investigation....

He inserted himself into it. He was the one who was chasing down these illegally hacked emails and making public statements. Obviously he was going to be questioned about what he knows.

The Trump team and Trump himself treated the emails and wikilinks as a joke...but they learned fast that angry dems can and will turn your little joke into an impeachable offense....

What makes you say that?

When Trump asked Russia to see if they could find Hillary's emails because the media and the FBI couldn't or wouldn't he was joking...the left went bonkers....it was a freaking joke that started the whole damn thing....a crack in the door for the evil dems and the deep state to enter....

Nonsense. The subject of the email leak was a big topic pumped up by Trump and his team. They weren't treated like a joke. He used them in his campaign extensively.

 

[colfax_m]

The lead juror misled the court to get a spot on the jury....how can anyone deny he is due a new trial?...The evil and angry lib media are salivating over an innocent man being sent to prison...someone has to stand for justice in this case...

The defense picked her just so they had a go-to in the end. Absolutely.

Where did you hear that?.....she even wiped her social media accounts to hide her true hate Trump feelings....

Ewwwww. That's obstruction isn't it? She could be disbarred for that.

No, it’s not obstruction. Don’t be absurd.

It is when Donald Trump tweets. That was absurd. So you're a first timer at politics. /snicker

What are you talking about?

 

[Rambunctious]

After being caught up in a phony Russia/Trump election tampering investigation....

He inserted himself into it. He was the one who was chasing down these illegally hacked emails and making public statements. Obviously he was going to be questioned about what he knows.

The Trump team and Trump himself treated the emails and wikilinks as a joke...but they learned fast that angry dems can and will turn your little joke into an impeachable offense....

What makes you say that?

When Trump asked Russia to see if they could find Hillary's emails because the media and the FBI couldn't or wouldn't he was joking...the left went bonkers....it was a freaking joke that started the whole damn thing....a crack in the door for the evil dems and the deep state to enter....

Nonsense. The subject of the email leak was a big topic pumped up by Trump and his team. They weren't treated like a joke. He used them in his campaign extensively.

If Trump really wanted Russia to look for Hillary's emails he wouldn't of asked them to do it in a national press conference.....he was joking....wiki links said that they know where to find them so Stone looked into it and got ensnared in the whole mess...oh by the way did you see where wikilinks is now saying Seth Rich was murdered for leaking to them what was happening at the DNC?....this ain't over by a long shot....

 

[colfax_m]

He inserted himself into it. He was the one who was chasing down these illegally hacked emails and making public statements. Obviously he was going to be questioned about what he knows.

The Trump team and Trump himself treated the emails and wikilinks as a joke...but they learned fast that angry dems can and will turn your little joke into an impeachable offense....

What makes you say that?

When Trump asked Russia to see if they could find Hillary's emails because the media and the FBI couldn't or wouldn't he was joking...the left went bonkers....it was a freaking joke that started the whole damn thing....a crack in the door for the evil dems and the deep state to enter....

Nonsense. The subject of the email leak was a big topic pumped up by Trump and his team. They weren't treated like a joke. He used them in his campaign extensively.

If Trump really wanted Russia to look for Hillary's emails he wouldn't of asked them to do it in a national press conference.....he was joking....wiki links said that they know where to find them so Stone looked into it and got ensnared in the whole mess...oh by the way did you see where wikilinks is now saying Seth Rich was murdered for leaking to them what was happening at the DNC?....this ain't over by a long shot....

I know you're focusing on the one comment, but there was a lot more to it than that. I accept that Trump was "joking" about finding Clinton's emails, but the campaign discussed the contents of her emails extensively prior to the election. This wasn't a joke. This was a big part of their strategy.

That's why Stone was looking into it. He was looking for advance notice and information that could help them form a strategy around this. So yeah, if you insert yourself into a situation where emails were stolen from one candidate and you're trying to use that to help another candidate, expect to be questioned about it, because it's a crime.

Oh, and Wikileaks has never said that Seth Rich was killed for leaking to them. They have said that Assange was offered a pardon for denying it was Russia, however.

 

[Rambunctious]

The Trump team and Trump himself treated the emails and wikilinks as a joke...but they learned fast that angry dems can and will turn your little joke into an impeachable offense....

What makes you say that?

When Trump asked Russia to see if they could find Hillary's emails because the media and the FBI couldn't or wouldn't he was joking...the left went bonkers....it was a freaking joke that started the whole damn thing....a crack in the door for the evil dems and the deep state to enter....

Nonsense. The subject of the email leak was a big topic pumped up by Trump and his team. They weren't treated like a joke. He used them in his campaign extensively.

If Trump really wanted Russia to look for Hillary's emails he wouldn't of asked them to do it in a national press conference.....he was joking....wiki links said that they know where to find them so Stone looked into it and got ensnared in the whole mess...oh by the way did you see where wikilinks is now saying Seth Rich was murdered for leaking to them what was happening at the DNC?....this ain't over by a long shot....

I know you're focusing on the one comment, but there was a lot more to it than that. I accept that Trump was "joking" about finding Clinton's emails, but the campaign discussed the contents of her emails extensively prior to the election. This wasn't a joke. This was a big part of their strategy.

That's why Stone was looking into it. He was looking for advance notice and information that could help them form a strategy around this. So yeah, if you insert yourself into a situation where emails were stolen from one candidate and you're trying to use that to help another candidate, expect to be questioned about it, because it's a crime.

Oh, and Wikileaks has never said that Seth Rich was killed for leaking to them. They have said that Assange was offered a pardon for denying it was Russia, however.

Colfax...answer me honestly...do you after all of the investigating really still believe Russia helped Trump win?....do you really think Putin would of preferred Trump over Clinton?...I can't see it...I can't understand how people can still believe it at this point...so tossing Stone in prison is just more piling on by angry establishment swamp dwellers....and take Trump out of it for a second...do you want those people running things again?...back to the stale old status quo?....why would you support that?...I don't get it....

 

[colfax_m]

What makes you say that?

When Trump asked Russia to see if they could find Hillary's emails because the media and the FBI couldn't or wouldn't he was joking...the left went bonkers....it was a freaking joke that started the whole damn thing....a crack in the door for the evil dems and the deep state to enter....

Nonsense. The subject of the email leak was a big topic pumped up by Trump and his team. They weren't treated like a joke. He used them in his campaign extensively.

If Trump really wanted Russia to look for Hillary's emails he wouldn't of asked them to do it in a national press conference.....he was joking....wiki links said that they know where to find them so Stone looked into it and got ensnared in the whole mess...oh by the way did you see where wikilinks is now saying Seth Rich was murdered for leaking to them what was happening at the DNC?....this ain't over by a long shot....

I know you're focusing on the one comment, but there was a lot more to it than that. I accept that Trump was "joking" about finding Clinton's emails, but the campaign discussed the contents of her emails extensively prior to the election. This wasn't a joke. This was a big part of their strategy.

That's why Stone was looking into it. He was looking for advance notice and information that could help them form a strategy around this. So yeah, if you insert yourself into a situation where emails were stolen from one candidate and you're trying to use that to help another candidate, expect to be questioned about it, because it's a crime.

Oh, and Wikileaks has never said that Seth Rich was killed for leaking to them. They have said that Assange was offered a pardon for denying it was Russia, however.

Colfax...answer me honestly...do you after all of the investigating really still believe Russia helped Trump win?....do you really think Putin would of preferred Trump over Clinton?...I can't see it...I can't understand how people can still believe it at this point...so tossing Stone in prison is just more piling on by angry establishment swamp dwellers....and take Trump out of it for a second...do you want those people running things again?...back to the stale old status quo?....why would you support that?...I don't get it....

I’m being 100% honest. Putin hated Clinton. Hates her. The beginning of the Obama administration was one of attempting to work with Russia but that soon soured after they got no reciprocation of Moscow. By the end of Clinton’s tenure as SoS, she was criticizing the integrity of their elections and by 2012, Putin was facing mass demonstrations. He survived, but it was clear that Clinton’s policy towards Russia would be quite adversarial and believed that it would be one of attempting regime change.

Do you remember the 2016 campaign? Do you remember the things Trump was saying about Putin? He was praising him. Putin was praising him back. During the campaign, Trump was quite friendly towards Russian interests, although one could hardly say he had much of a foreign policy, it was clear to any observer that Trump was most interested in a friendlier relationship.

After all the investigations? All the investigations have basically confirmed this idea. Trump was their favorite candidate.

Why shouldn’t I believe it?

 

[Rambunctious]

When Trump asked Russia to see if they could find Hillary's emails because the media and the FBI couldn't or wouldn't he was joking...the left went bonkers....it was a freaking joke that started the whole damn thing....a crack in the door for the evil dems and the deep state to enter....

Nonsense. The subject of the email leak was a big topic pumped up by Trump and his team. They weren't treated like a joke. He used them in his campaign extensively.

If Trump really wanted Russia to look for Hillary's emails he wouldn't of asked them to do it in a national press conference.....he was joking....wiki links said that they know where to find them so Stone looked into it and got ensnared in the whole mess...oh by the way did you see where wikilinks is now saying Seth Rich was murdered for leaking to them what was happening at the DNC?....this ain't over by a long shot....

I know you're focusing on the one comment, but there was a lot more to it than that. I accept that Trump was "joking" about finding Clinton's emails, but the campaign discussed the contents of her emails extensively prior to the election. This wasn't a joke. This was a big part of their strategy.

That's why Stone was looking into it. He was looking for advance notice and information that could help them form a strategy around this. So yeah, if you insert yourself into a situation where emails were stolen from one candidate and you're trying to use that to help another candidate, expect to be questioned about it, because it's a crime.

Oh, and Wikileaks has never said that Seth Rich was killed for leaking to them. They have said that Assange was offered a pardon for denying it was Russia, however.

Colfax...answer me honestly...do you after all of the investigating really still believe Russia helped Trump win?....do you really think Putin would of preferred Trump over Clinton?...I can't see it...I can't understand how people can still believe it at this point...so tossing Stone in prison is just more piling on by angry establishment swamp dwellers....and take Trump out of it for a second...do you want those people running things again?...back to the stale old status quo?....why would you support that?...I don't get it....

I’m being 100% honest. Putin hated Clinton. Hates her. The beginning of the Obama administration was one of attempting to work with Russia but that soon soured after they got no reciprocation of Moscow. By the end of Clinton’s tenure as SoS, she was criticizing the integrity of their elections and by 2012, Putin was facing mass demonstrations. He survived, but it was clear that Clinton’s policy towards Russia would be quite adversarial and believed that it would be one of attempting regime change.

Do you remember the 2016 campaign? Do you remember the things Trump was saying about Putin? He was praising him. Putin was praising him back. During the campaign, Trump was quite friendly towards Russian interests, although one could hardly say he had much of a foreign policy, it was clear to any observer that Trump was most interested in a friendlier relationship.

After all the investigations? All the investigations have basically confirmed this idea. Trump was their favorite candidate.

Why shouldn’t I believe it?

Putin doesn't hate Hillary he was disgusted by her reaction to Qaddafi being assassinated in the streets by his own people...he asked her and Obama how they were able to sleep at night...but that doesn't mean Putin wanted an America First president that was calling out people around the globe for buying Russian natural gas and oil...come on...don't buy the CNN shortsighted line....no way in hell Putin wanted Trump to win...

 

[colfax_m]

Nonsense. The subject of the email leak was a big topic pumped up by Trump and his team. They weren't treated like a joke. He used them in his campaign extensively.

If Trump really wanted Russia to look for Hillary's emails he wouldn't of asked them to do it in a national press conference.....he was joking....wiki links said that they know where to find them so Stone looked into it and got ensnared in the whole mess...oh by the way did you see where wikilinks is now saying Seth Rich was murdered for leaking to them what was happening at the DNC?....this ain't over by a long shot....

I know you're focusing on the one comment, but there was a lot more to it than that. I accept that Trump was "joking" about finding Clinton's emails, but the campaign discussed the contents of her emails extensively prior to the election. This wasn't a joke. This was a big part of their strategy.

That's why Stone was looking into it. He was looking for advance notice and information that could help them form a strategy around this. So yeah, if you insert yourself into a situation where emails were stolen from one candidate and you're trying to use that to help another candidate, expect to be questioned about it, because it's a crime.

Oh, and Wikileaks has never said that Seth Rich was killed for leaking to them. They have said that Assange was offered a pardon for denying it was Russia, however.

Colfax...answer me honestly...do you after all of the investigating really still believe Russia helped Trump win?....do you really think Putin would of preferred Trump over Clinton?...I can't see it...I can't understand how people can still believe it at this point...so tossing Stone in prison is just more piling on by angry establishment swamp dwellers....and take Trump out of it for a second...do you want those people running things again?...back to the stale old status quo?....why would you support that?...I don't get it....

I’m being 100% honest. Putin hated Clinton. Hates her. The beginning of the Obama administration was one of attempting to work with Russia but that soon soured after they got no reciprocation of Moscow. By the end of Clinton’s tenure as SoS, she was criticizing the integrity of their elections and by 2012, Putin was facing mass demonstrations. He survived, but it was clear that Clinton’s policy towards Russia would be quite adversarial and believed that it would be one of attempting regime change.

Do you remember the 2016 campaign? Do you remember the things Trump was saying about Putin? He was praising him. Putin was praising him back. During the campaign, Trump was quite friendly towards Russian interests, although one could hardly say he had much of a foreign policy, it was clear to any observer that Trump was most interested in a friendlier relationship.

After all the investigations? All the investigations have basically confirmed this idea. Trump was their favorite candidate.

Why shouldn’t I believe it?

Putin doesn't hate Hillary he was disgusted by her reaction to Qaddafi being assassinated in the streets by his own people...he asked her and Obama how they were able to sleep at night...but that doesn't mean Putin wanted an America First president that was calling out people around the globe for buying Russian natural gas and oil...come on...don't buy the CNN shortsighted line....no way in hell Putin wanted Trump to win...

Sorry, but Putin hated Clinton. Putin’s first instinct is and always will be self preservation. He put himself atop a corrupt undemocratic state, which is a delicate place to be. It’s not surprising he would be concerned about the treatment of another corrupt totalitarian leader such as Qaddafi. Clinton was a Hawk. She was pushing for intervention in Libya. Given her history, a President Clinton might be pushing for regime change in Russia too.

As for natural gas, Russia had no reason to worry about that. Their exports to Europe have increased dramatically even under Trump. LNG is not market competitive with Russian pipelines without major cooperation and sacrifices from European leaders. Trump hasn’t been doing much there.

Its not CNN that I really care about. It’s the US intelligence community. It’s the US law enforcement. They’re the best in the world. Every one of them has come back with the same conclusion.