Trump Says Roger Stone Has a Good Chance of Exoneration.

Something tells me that was just rhetoric. Mr. Stone is not the killing type. He speaks eloquently all over the world and speaks at intellectual affairs. He's the last person you'd throw in jail, and everybody on both sides of the aisle knows he was railroaded by the hatred-shills of that court who will soon be facing the higher courts for decision malfeasance sans any jurisprudence whatsoever due to party-line prejudice.
It matters not. Threaten a witness gearing up to testify and you risk going to prison for witness tampering.
Mr. Faun, that alleged threat doesn't pass muster. He was quoting Lucy from Charlie Brown and you know it. :rolleyes:
LOLOL

A jury of his peers laughs at you too.
Well, okay, I don't think Lucy ever used the CS word, but she was always used by Charles Schultz to make people laugh, and she was always saying "Prepare to die" Or just "Die" followed by some humorous name or reason. Not only would a jury of his peers laugh at what he said, the whole world thought that was a funny way of putting away some mundane annoyance or characteristic of another cartoon character. So you weren't a fan of Lucy, hm?


What the fuck are you rambling about?? A jury of his peers convicted him.

As usual, you wind up using gutterspeak. Enjoy your break from reality with a listing on my ignore list with other heathens.

Hillary suicides people and that's okay to the Demonrats who worship power. Roger Stone quotes Lucy of Charlie Brown to make a literary point, and it's hang 'em high. A vulture is higher on the food chain than play-dumb Faun and his partners in crime.
 
Lying to Congress. Maybe we should just make that legal? Get rid of the law that says it’s illegal to lie to Congress. Might as well, right?
It was a perjury trap.. they had the emails

Prove it.
Are you saying Congress didn’t have the emails?

Im waiting for you to prove it.
Prove me
Wrong
Nope. You made the claim. Prove it or shut up.
 
The lead juror misled the court to get a spot on the jury....how can anyone deny he is due a new trial?...The evil and angry lib media are salivating over an innocent man being sent to prison...someone has to stand for justice in this case...

Because he isn’t innocent. The evidence against him is overwhelming. If he gets another trial, he’s getting another conviction, so long as Barr doesn’t scuttle the whole thing for political reasons.
Mueller claimed to have "purviewed" Democrats saying their stuff that was irrelevant. That's a lie. Roger Stone had nothing to do with Russian collusion. Why was that not purviewed? Because he's a Trump supporter? That's exactly why. The Pendulum swings, Mr. Mueller. Either you purview all that has nothing to do with Russian Collusion or you don't. You aimed your hate-and-get Trump agitators at Trump, Trump's friend, Trumps' supporters, and your idiots wiped their boots all over Trump's family, yet YOU DIDN'T EVEN BOTHER YOURSELF ABOUT THE FINDINGS ON WHO STARTED THE LYING DOSSIER THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN NAMED THE HILLARY CLINTON DOSSIER NOT THE STEEL DOSSIER.

Colfax, there are laws. If Clinton was out of Mueller's purview, so was Stone. You are not allowed to use the suit against one person to everyone he knows who is not in the least minor way guilty of colluding with Russia.

Hillary did collude with Russia and she did along with her boss, Barack Obama. The law says you can't use your office against your political rival. but they did, and Mudller did. All three of them ought to be behind bars for playing dirty politics.

Muller's purview was Russian involvement in the US election and any connection to anyone in the US on that issue. Roger Stone's lies were before the House Committee on Intelligence and related to his communications with people involving themselves in the release of the emails that Russian operatives stole. It's entirely on point.

At the end of the day, the Russians attacked the DNC and Clinton's campaign committing many felonies in the process. No such process occurred in favor of Clinton so there was nothing for Mueller to investigate.
Prove it. Roger Stone is on the international speaker call first list, and all the Demonrats can do is sully his name because he knows someone who knows someone who knows someone who is a janitor for the KGB in Siberia, of the Soviet Socialist Republic, plus he quoted Lucy in Charlie Brown to make a literary point, so he must go to the gallows in America. Oh, yeah - :right:

:bsflag:
 
The lead juror misled the court to get a spot on the jury....how can anyone deny he is due a new trial?...The evil and angry lib media are salivating over an innocent man being sent to prison...someone has to stand for justice in this case...
The defense picked her just so they had a go-to in the end. Absolutely.
Where did you hear that?.....she even wiped her social media accounts to hide her true hate Trump feelings....
Ewwwww. That's obstruction isn't it? She could be disbarred for that.
No, it’s not obstruction. Don’t be absurd.
 
The lead juror misled the court to get a spot on the jury....how can anyone deny he is due a new trial?...The evil and angry lib media are salivating over an innocent man being sent to prison...someone has to stand for justice in this case...

Because he isn’t innocent. The evidence against him is overwhelming. If he gets another trial, he’s getting another conviction, so long as Barr doesn’t scuttle the whole thing for political reasons.
Mueller claimed to have "purviewed" Democrats saying their stuff that was irrelevant. That's a lie. Roger Stone had nothing to do with Russian collusion. Why was that not purviewed? Because he's a Trump supporter? That's exactly why. The Pendulum swings, Mr. Mueller. Either you purview all that has nothing to do with Russian Collusion or you don't. You aimed your hate-and-get Trump agitators at Trump, Trump's friend, Trumps' supporters, and your idiots wiped their boots all over Trump's family, yet YOU DIDN'T EVEN BOTHER YOURSELF ABOUT THE FINDINGS ON WHO STARTED THE LYING DOSSIER THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN NAMED THE HILLARY CLINTON DOSSIER NOT THE STEEL DOSSIER.

Colfax, there are laws. If Clinton was out of Mueller's purview, so was Stone. You are not allowed to use the suit against one person to everyone he knows who is not in the least minor way guilty of colluding with Russia.

Hillary did collude with Russia and she did along with her boss, Barack Obama. The law says you can't use your office against your political rival. but they did, and Mudller did. All three of them ought to be behind bars for playing dirty politics.

Muller's purview was Russian involvement in the US election and any connection to anyone in the US on that issue. Roger Stone's lies were before the House Committee on Intelligence and related to his communications with people involving themselves in the release of the emails that Russian operatives stole. It's entirely on point.

At the end of the day, the Russians attacked the DNC and Clinton's campaign committing many felonies in the process. No such process occurred in favor of Clinton so there was nothing for Mueller to investigate.
Prove it. Roger Stone is on the international speaker call first list, and all the Demonrats can do is sully his name because he knows someone who knows someone who knows someone who is a janitor for the KGB in Siberia, of the Soviet Socialist Republic, plus he quoted Lucy in Charlie Brown to make a literary point, so he must go to the gallows in America. Oh, yeah - :right:

:bsflag:
Prove what exactly? That he lied to Congress? That he threatened and bullied a witness? It was proven in court. Every scrap of it.
 
It matters not. Threaten a witness gearing up to testify and you risk going to prison for witness tampering.
Mr. Faun, that alleged threat doesn't pass muster. He was quoting Lucy from Charlie Brown and you know it. :rolleyes:
LOLOL

A jury of his peers laughs at you too.
Well, okay, I don't think Lucy ever used the CS word, but she was always used by Charles Schultz to make people laugh, and she was always saying "Prepare to die" Or just "Die" followed by some humorous name or reason. Not only would a jury of his peers laugh at what he said, the whole world thought that was a funny way of putting away some mundane annoyance or characteristic of another cartoon character. So you weren't a fan of Lucy, hm?


What the fuck are you rambling about?? A jury of his peers convicted him.

As usual, you wind up using gutterspeak. Enjoy your break from reality with a listing on my ignore list with other heathens.

Hillary suicides people and that's okay to the Demonrats who worship power. Roger Stone quotes Lucy of Charlie Brown to make a literary point, and it's hang 'em high. A vulture is higher on the food chain than play-dumb Faun and his partners in crime.

If you don't want to hear "gutterspeak," you shouldn't play in the sewer. The rest of your rant is ludicrous. Stone was not quoting Lucy, Hillary died not suicide people, and Roger Stone is a convicted felon who's going to prison.
 
President Donald Trump on Thursday strongly hinted that Roger Stone would not end up serving the 40-month prison sentence handed down by a federal judge, saying his former longtime political adviser “has a very good chance of exoneration.” But while Trump railed against the Justice Department during a prison graduation ceremony in Las Vegas, he added that he would not grant the convicted GOP operative a pardon at the moment because he wanted to “let the process play out,” an apparent allusion to Stone’s petition for a new trial.

Hours earlier, Stone had been sentenced to more than three years in prison on charges of lying to investigators, obstructing Congress and witness intimidation, immediately raising questions about whether the president will pardon his former confidant for what he’s decried as a miscarriage of justice.

More here:

Trump: Roger Stone has 'very good chance of exoneration' but will 'let the process play out'

Here is how it is going to play out
Stone won't get a retrial.

Trump will pardon another of his criminal buddies.

Yes, but he may wait to do it until after the election.
 
The lead juror misled the court to get a spot on the jury....how can anyone deny he is due a new trial?...The evil and angry lib media are salivating over an innocent man being sent to prison...someone has to stand for justice in this case...
Oh? How did she mislead the court?
 
The lead juror misled the court to get a spot on the jury....how can anyone deny he is due a new trial?...The evil and angry lib media are salivating over an innocent man being sent to prison...someone has to stand for justice in this case...

Because he isn’t innocent. The evidence against him is overwhelming. If he gets another trial, he’s getting another conviction, so long as Barr doesn’t scuttle the whole thing for political reasons.
Guilty of what? Fucking with democrats? Lol process crimes?

Lying to Congress. Maybe we should just make that legal? Get rid of the law that says it’s illegal to lie to Congress. Might as well, right?

If Congress can so willingly and so often lie to us as they are want to do, then it should rightfully be open season to lie to them right back.

No one in Congress is allowed to lie under oath. Same rules apply to everyone else. Stone has been lying his ass off for decades, it only caught up to him after he lied under oath.
 
The Stone JURY found him guilty on all SEVEN felony counts!

First Republicans attacked the FBI.
Then Republicans attacked the Justice Department
Now Republicans attack judges.
And Jurors.

The problem seems to be that Republicans are getting convicted for crimes- and in order to explain that Republicans feel a need to denigrate every part of our justice system- from law enforcement to prosecutors to judges to jurors.

And by the way- this is part of the same movement as trying to convince Americans that they can't believe anything in the media- but should only believe what their Dear Leader says.
 
The lead juror misled the court to get a spot on the jury....how can anyone deny he is due a new trial?...The evil and angry lib media are salivating over an innocent man being sent to prison...someone has to stand for justice in this case...
Oh? How did she mislead the court?
<crickets>
In her pre trial questioning...she lied about her knowledge about the case and that she was not politically biased...her social media accounts showed otherwise...when that was discovered and reviled she deleted everything...she is a strong willed person and she bullied herself into the lead juror position....
 

Forum List

Back
Top