Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Link?
Exposing your lies is fun...............and easy.
www.politico.com
Yeah, the FBI made up enough good "evidence" to fool the FISA court numerous times to push the Russia collusion sham, Simp.
Grow a brain.
The stolen election let us know how corrupt our government really is. There was never a proper investigation. 74 million wanted answers. They got arrested and censored.And you can continue to be an idiot.
What PROOF do you have that this judge is corrupt and/or has been 'weaponized'?
None?
Just because you don't like reality, doesn't mean that the world conforms to your delusions.
The stolen election let us know how corrupt our government really is. There was never a proper investigation. 74 million wanted answers. They got arrested and censored.
Your lefty source relying on leaks from an archivist says nothing about him selling anything to anyone, Simp.Here's you link, fool:
Documents recovered at Mar-a-Lago were among government's most classified, letter shows
In the letter, posted on a Trump-aligned journalist's website, the National Archives pushed back on Trump's privilege claims.
No, it wasn't. You are a moron.
agreedThe stolen election let us know how corrupt our government really is. There was never a proper investigation. 74 million wanted answers. They got arrested and censored.
I just wonder did you find the Covid raw data yourself or did you only believe what MSM told you? BTW, do you have the latest COVID data?
Sound strategy
Dummy has it confused with prior judge who authorized the break inNo, no, no it didn't.
The case isn't even before a Federal Circuit Court you dumbfuck
The affidavit is being made partially public, dimwit.
If that doesn't satisfy you too bad. The evidence satisfied the judge, and that's what counts.
He took way too many pencils and paper clips.Trump Kept More Than 700 Pages of Classified Documents, Letter From National Archives Says
President Donald J. Trump took more than 700 pages of classified documents, including some related to the nation’s most covert intelligence operations, to his private club and residence in Florida when he left the White House in January 2021, according to a letter that the National Archives sent to his lawyers this year.
The letter, dated May 10 and written by the acting U.S. archivist, Debra Steidel Wall, to one of Mr. Trump’s lawyers, M. Evan Corcoran, described the state of alarm in the Justice Department as officials there began to realize how serious the documents were.
It also suggested that top department prosecutors and members of the intelligence community were delayed in conducting a damage assessment about the documents’ removal from the White House as Mr. Trump’s lawyers tried to argue that some of them might have been protected by executive privilege.
Trump Kept Over 700 Pages of Classified Documents, Letter Says (Published 2022)
The letter from the National Archives, which was sent to the former president’s lawyers, described Justice Department officials’ alarm as they realized the nature of the documents at Mar-a-Lago.www.nytimes.com
Of course, this is inconsequential to adoring Trump fans who forgive him everything.
And you can continue to be an idiot.
What PROOF do you have that this judge is corrupt and/or has been 'weaponized'?
None?
Just because you don't like reality, doesn't mean that the world conforms to your delusions.
www.cnbc.com
Trump Kept More Than 700 Pages of Classified Documents, Letter From National Archives Says
President Donald J. Trump took more than 700 pages of classified documents, including some related to the nation’s most covert intelligence operations, to his private club and residence in Florida when he left the White House in January 2021, according to a letter that the National Archives sent to his lawyers this year.
The letter, dated May 10 and written by the acting U.S. archivist, Debra Steidel Wall, to one of Mr. Trump’s lawyers, M. Evan Corcoran, described the state of alarm in the Justice Department as officials there began to realize how serious the documents were.
It also suggested that top department prosecutors and members of the intelligence community were delayed in conducting a damage assessment about the documents’ removal from the White House as Mr. Trump’s lawyers tried to argue that some of them might have been protected by executive privilege.
Trump Kept Over 700 Pages of Classified Documents, Letter Says (Published 2022)
The letter from the National Archives, which was sent to the former president’s lawyers, described Justice Department officials’ alarm as they realized the nature of the documents at Mar-a-Lago.
Of course, this is inconsequential to adoring Trump fans who forgive him everything.
A federal judge appointed by former President Donald Trump ordered him Tuesday to answer several key questions about his new lawsuit related to the FBI raid on his Florida home, including why her court should be the one hearing the case and to more precisely explain what he wants her to do.
Judge Aileen Cannon also ordered Trump to tell her how his suit affects another pending case involving the same search warrant before a federal magistrate judge in the same court, and whether the Department of Justice has been served with his lawsuit yet. Cannon also wants to know if Trump is seeking any injunctions related to material seized in the raid until the lawsuit is resolved.
Cannon’s order came a day after Trump filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, asking her to appoint a so-called special master to review documents seized Aug. 8 in the FBI raid on his Mar-a-Lago resort residence in Palm Beach.
The judge, whom Trump appointed to that court in 2020, gave him and his lawyers until Friday to answer her questions.
Judge orders Trump to give details about Mar-a-Lago search warrant lawsuit
The Department of Justice is investigating the removal of White House documents when Trump left office in early 2021.
Don is on an epic losing streak in court.
No, it wasn't. You are a moron.
Tell us exactly what was verified, Simp.
From YOUR link:
Varied observations of dossier's veracity
Steele, the author of the dossier, said he believes that 70–90% of the dossier is accurate,[75][57] although he gives the "golden showers" allegation a 50% chance of being true.[57] In testimony to Congress, Simpson quoted "Steele as saying that any intelligence, especially from Russia, is bound to carry intentional disinformation, but that Steele believes his dossier is 'largely not disinformation'."[116] Steele has countered the suggestion that the Russians deliberately fed his sources misinformation that would undermine Trump: "The ultimate Russian goal was to prevent Hillary Clinton from becoming president, and therefore, the idea that they would intentionally spread embarrassing information about Trump—true or not—is not logical."[18]
Other observers and experts have had varying reactions to the dossier. Generally, "former intelligence officers and other national-security experts" urged "skepticism and caution" but still took "the fact that the nation's top intelligence officials chose to present a summary version of the dossier to both President Obama and President-elect Trump" as an indication "that they may have had a relatively high degree of confidence that at least some of the claims therein were credible, or at least worth investigating further".[350]
Vice President Joe Biden told reporters that, while he and Obama were receiving a briefing on the extent of election hacking attempts, there was a two-page addendum which addressed the contents of the Steele dossier.[118] Top intelligence officials told them they "felt obligated to inform them about uncorroborated allegations about President-elect Donald Trump out of concern the information would become public and catch them off-guard".[367]
On January 11, 2017, Newsweek published a list of "13 things that don't add up" in the dossier, writing that it was a "strange mix of the amateur and the insightful" and stating that it "contains lots of Kremlin-related gossip that could indeed be, as the author claims, from deep insiders—or equally gleaned" from Russian newspapers and blogs.[368] Former UK ambassador to Russia Sir Tony Brenton said certain aspects of the dossier were inconsistent with British intelligence's understanding of how the Kremlin works, commenting: "I've seen quite a lot of intelligence on Russia, and there are some things in [the dossier] which look pretty shaky."[369]
In his June 2017 Senate Intelligence Committee testimony, former FBI director James Comey said "some personally sensitive aspects" of the dossier were unverified when he briefed Trump on them on January 6, 2017.[370] Comey also said he could not say publicly whether any of the allegations in the dossier had been confirmed.[343]
The FBI was there in June, why didn't they pick them up then?
.
Excuse me if I'm skeptical of your post, you lying sack of KKKandadian dogshit, but why did you not include any links to back up your claim, Simp?What a lovely collection of quotes, all urging caution, but none of it saying that much of the dossier hasn't been verified. All of it just urged caution in the use of the materials until verified.
Once Comey left the employment of the FBI in January of 2017, he would have no way of knowing what had been verified and what hadn't.
The Mueller Report did all of their own investigations, and that confirmed much of the information in the Steele Dossier as well. Mueller found that the Russian government backed Donald Trump very strongly and did much to discredit Hillary Clinton, especially the slow drip of emails from the DNC the Russians fed to Julian Assange, and which Roger Stone and the Trump Campaign used to great effect.
All of the Dossier information about Trump's proposed business dealings in Moscow was proven true. The connections between the Trump Campaign, Roger Stone, and the Russian hackers is proven, by Stone's conviction and pardon.
Basically, the only thing not definitively proven was the pee tape, and if it doesn't exist, how come the Trump Campaign spent so much effort to try to get hands on it?
