Trump says Biden is “against God” but can’t even articulate what that means

[AzogtheDefiler]

We all knows what he means. Biden is an asshole that thinks religion is detriment to making this country a Socialist Shithole.

Just remember that the Obama/Biden administration put out a Justice Department position paper that said that Americans that "cling to their religion" are a security threat.

Link??

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/12/21/obama-dusts-off-his-cling-to-guns-or-religion-idea-for-donald-trump/

 

[pknopp]

Trump says Biden is 'against God'

President Trump attacked former Vice President Joe Biden on Thursday by accusing him of being “against God.”

www.yahoo.com

“He’s following the radical left agenda: take away your guns, destroy your Second Amendment, no religion, no anything, hurt the Bible, hurt God,” Trump said during a campaign visit to Ohio. “He’s against God, he’s against guns.”

Right of course. It clearly says in the Bible “Don't turn the other cheek. Shoot him!”

I’m so glad we have a moron like Trump to point out to us the lost passages in the Bible about semi-automatic weapons.

Well, coveting your neighbor's property and stealing are against the Ten Commandments and Biden is a major wealth envy let's rob them at gunpoint advocate. Leftists also worship government over God. That's three right there.

And then there's Biden claiming global warming is a religious issue. I try not to pull lying into politics because they are politicians and it's the nature of the beast, but using religion to justify something like that really is bearing false witness. My God, that's sick

You shall not pollute the land in which you live, for blood pollutes the land, and no atonement can be made for the land for the blood that is shed in it, except by the blood of the one who shed it. You shall not defile the land in which you live, in the midst of which I dwell, for I the Lord dwell in the midst of the people of Israel.”

Numbers 35: 33-34

Except there's the big lie. Democrats don't believe in global warming. There are two things we could start doing now that would have a massive affect on carbon emissions and would not wreck our economy, and Democrats oppose both of them. Those are nuclear power and fracking for natural gas.

Instead Democrats want to dump trillions into socialism, like the minimum income, and pretend that's a green policy.

You want to know what isn't green, biofuel, and you do support that. It's massive carbon emissions.

Democrats have absolutely zero support for reducing greenhouse gasses, It's just a political opportunity to you

Two different issues. One is whether or not the Democrats believe what they say and the other is whether or not environmental issues are in the Bible.

I replied to the statement that it was not. It is.

I see your point, but that doesn't really contradict me. My argument was that when Biden said global warming was a religious issue, but the commandment I cited was that he lied. He doesn't believe that.

My second argument was consistent with that.

Politicians all lie, but when he's using the Bible to lie, that's another level of lie

Obama did little to nothing and Biden will do the same but that doesn't mean we shouldn't abide by the words I quoted.

So you support nuclear power and fracking for natural gas to replace coal plants?

I am NOT against power as we can not completely turn away from it today BUT I am for increasing our investments into alternative sources.

If you don't, you don't believe it either. Those are the only things in our current level of technology that would make a difference big enough to matter.

Going to "renewable" energy is not in our current technical ability, any more than traveling to another galaxy. We aren't to the point we can do that. Any honest analysis of renewable fuels will compellingly convince you of that.

So is this a REAL issue to you or just a political one, like Joe Biden?

We are indeed turning more to alternatives. You can deny that if you wish but we are. Are alternatives may not be perfect yet but they are steps in the right direction. The direction the Bible leads us to.

That doesn't contradict what I said.

I did NOT say that we can't produce ANY power with renewable energy. What I said is it can't replace in any meaningful way enough energy to replace our current energy production with renewable energy.

We are replacing it all the time. I don't really care to try and argue over what is "meaningful". We are expanding renewable energy every year. That is the path we need to continue to take. We need to step up investments into renewable sources.

We've sunk massive amounts of money into renewable energy, and it barely makes a dent in slowing the growth of other energy.

We simply aren't technologically advanced enough to replace our current system with renewable, we're probably a century from that at least.

Nuclear power is the ONLY zero emissions energy source that produces a significant amount of energy.

And natural gas is significantly cleaner than coal or other fossil fuels.

If emissions is this important to you, how the hell can you not want to rely on the two things that would actually work here and now and not wreck our economies? How does that make sense?

Nuclear is not zero emission. Nuclears emissions are simply a different type. Emissions that we leave to future generations to deal with.

 

[pknopp]

But the armed shall inherit the land and delight themselves in grabbing women by the pussy


Trump 37:11

He never said that but you keep perpetuating the lie. Why?

Sarcasm. You knew that though.

Not your second part. He never said that why did you insinuate that he did?

He did say the second part. He didn't actually say the first but that completed the verse.

Nope. He never said the 2nd part. He said they LET you grab them. Big difference. Shows consent vs. wanton misbehavior. Funny how you and your ilk consistently leave that magic three letter word out.

We've seen how this "Let you" works. It works in the head of the perpetrator. We have had may women come forward that wanted this kind of action addressed but they knew no one would take them seriously. Those like yourself still do not. That's unfortunate. Bill Cosby didn't think he was doing anything wrong either.

 

[anynameyouwish]

Trump says Biden is 'against God'

President Trump attacked former Vice President Joe Biden on Thursday by accusing him of being “against God.”

www.yahoo.com

“He’s following the radical left agenda: take away your guns, destroy your Second Amendment, no religion, no anything, hurt the Bible, hurt God,” Trump said during a campaign visit to Ohio. “He’s against God, he’s against guns.”

Right of course. It clearly says in the Bible “Don't turn the other cheek. Shoot him!”

I’m so glad we have a moron like Trump to point out to us the lost passages in the Bible about semi-automatic weapons.

the only person who is hurting god and evangelicals is trump.

before trump I ignored evangelicals

now, with their support of trump, an immoral, unethical, piece of human garbage, I have developed a strong distaste for these dirtbags

trump is hurting god by being so godless

i use to ignore evangelicals and their god. Now I oppose them and will work to defeat them

 

[kaz]

Trump says Biden is 'against God'

President Trump attacked former Vice President Joe Biden on Thursday by accusing him of being “against God.”

www.yahoo.com

“He’s following the radical left agenda: take away your guns, destroy your Second Amendment, no religion, no anything, hurt the Bible, hurt God,” Trump said during a campaign visit to Ohio. “He’s against God, he’s against guns.”

Right of course. It clearly says in the Bible “Don't turn the other cheek. Shoot him!”

I’m so glad we have a moron like Trump to point out to us the lost passages in the Bible about semi-automatic weapons.

Well, coveting your neighbor's property and stealing are against the Ten Commandments and Biden is a major wealth envy let's rob them at gunpoint advocate. Leftists also worship government over God. That's three right there.

And then there's Biden claiming global warming is a religious issue. I try not to pull lying into politics because they are politicians and it's the nature of the beast, but using religion to justify something like that really is bearing false witness. My God, that's sick

You shall not pollute the land in which you live, for blood pollutes the land, and no atonement can be made for the land for the blood that is shed in it, except by the blood of the one who shed it. You shall not defile the land in which you live, in the midst of which I dwell, for I the Lord dwell in the midst of the people of Israel.”

Numbers 35: 33-34

Except there's the big lie. Democrats don't believe in global warming. There are two things we could start doing now that would have a massive affect on carbon emissions and would not wreck our economy, and Democrats oppose both of them. Those are nuclear power and fracking for natural gas.

Instead Democrats want to dump trillions into socialism, like the minimum income, and pretend that's a green policy.

You want to know what isn't green, biofuel, and you do support that. It's massive carbon emissions.

Democrats have absolutely zero support for reducing greenhouse gasses, It's just a political opportunity to you

Two different issues. One is whether or not the Democrats believe what they say and the other is whether or not environmental issues are in the Bible.

I replied to the statement that it was not. It is.

I see your point, but that doesn't really contradict me. My argument was that when Biden said global warming was a religious issue, but the commandment I cited was that he lied. He doesn't believe that.

My second argument was consistent with that.

Politicians all lie, but when he's using the Bible to lie, that's another level of lie

Obama did little to nothing and Biden will do the same but that doesn't mean we shouldn't abide by the words I quoted.

So you support nuclear power and fracking for natural gas to replace coal plants?

I am NOT against power as we can not completely turn away from it today BUT I am for increasing our investments into alternative sources.

If you don't, you don't believe it either. Those are the only things in our current level of technology that would make a difference big enough to matter.

Going to "renewable" energy is not in our current technical ability, any more than traveling to another galaxy. We aren't to the point we can do that. Any honest analysis of renewable fuels will compellingly convince you of that.

So is this a REAL issue to you or just a political one, like Joe Biden?

We are indeed turning more to alternatives. You can deny that if you wish but we are. Are alternatives may not be perfect yet but they are steps in the right direction. The direction the Bible leads us to.

That doesn't contradict what I said.

I did NOT say that we can't produce ANY power with renewable energy. What I said is it can't replace in any meaningful way enough energy to replace our current energy production with renewable energy.

We are replacing it all the time. I don't really care to try and argue over what is "meaningful". We are expanding renewable energy every year. That is the path we need to continue to take. We need to step up investments into renewable sources.

We've sunk massive amounts of money into renewable energy, and it barely makes a dent in slowing the growth of other energy.

We simply aren't technologically advanced enough to replace our current system with renewable, we're probably a century from that at least.

Nuclear power is the ONLY zero emissions energy source that produces a significant amount of energy.

And natural gas is significantly cleaner than coal or other fossil fuels.

If emissions is this important to you, how the hell can you not want to rely on the ONLY two things that would actually work here and now with our current level of technology and not wreck our economies? How does that make sense?

Nuclear is not zero emission. Nuclears emissions are simply a different type. Emissions that we leave to future generations to deal with.

Emissions refers to carbon emissions. Yes, nuclear is zero emissions.

And so we have that you are all about the environment, but you pass on two things we could do today with our current level of technology that would dramatically reduce carbon emissions for no reason you can describe.

Well, you are like Biden. Global warming isn't an issue for you, it's an opportunity

 

[bodecea]

Trump says Biden is 'against God'

President Trump attacked former Vice President Joe Biden on Thursday by accusing him of being “against God.”

www.yahoo.com

“He’s following the radical left agenda: take away your guns, destroy your Second Amendment, no religion, no anything, hurt the Bible, hurt God,” Trump said during a campaign visit to Ohio. “He’s against God, he’s against guns.”

Right of course. It clearly says in the Bible “Don't turn the other cheek. Shoot him!”

I’m so glad we have a moron like Trump to point out to us the lost passages in the Bible about semi-automatic weapons.

HEAD TO A PADDED ROOM! THE ELECTION IS COMING AND YOU ARE NOT GOING TO LIKE THE RESULTS!
TRUMP 2020! KAG! KAG! KAG!

You’ll always have that little gem of video huh?

They've got very little else....so they keep putting it out there. They're in a pathetic little rut.

 

[pknopp]

Trump says Biden is 'against God'

President Trump attacked former Vice President Joe Biden on Thursday by accusing him of being “against God.”

www.yahoo.com

“He’s following the radical left agenda: take away your guns, destroy your Second Amendment, no religion, no anything, hurt the Bible, hurt God,” Trump said during a campaign visit to Ohio. “He’s against God, he’s against guns.”

Right of course. It clearly says in the Bible “Don't turn the other cheek. Shoot him!”

I’m so glad we have a moron like Trump to point out to us the lost passages in the Bible about semi-automatic weapons.

Well, coveting your neighbor's property and stealing are against the Ten Commandments and Biden is a major wealth envy let's rob them at gunpoint advocate. Leftists also worship government over God. That's three right there.

And then there's Biden claiming global warming is a religious issue. I try not to pull lying into politics because they are politicians and it's the nature of the beast, but using religion to justify something like that really is bearing false witness. My God, that's sick

You shall not pollute the land in which you live, for blood pollutes the land, and no atonement can be made for the land for the blood that is shed in it, except by the blood of the one who shed it. You shall not defile the land in which you live, in the midst of which I dwell, for I the Lord dwell in the midst of the people of Israel.”

Numbers 35: 33-34

Except there's the big lie. Democrats don't believe in global warming. There are two things we could start doing now that would have a massive affect on carbon emissions and would not wreck our economy, and Democrats oppose both of them. Those are nuclear power and fracking for natural gas.

Instead Democrats want to dump trillions into socialism, like the minimum income, and pretend that's a green policy.

You want to know what isn't green, biofuel, and you do support that. It's massive carbon emissions.

Democrats have absolutely zero support for reducing greenhouse gasses, It's just a political opportunity to you

Two different issues. One is whether or not the Democrats believe what they say and the other is whether or not environmental issues are in the Bible.

I replied to the statement that it was not. It is.

I see your point, but that doesn't really contradict me. My argument was that when Biden said global warming was a religious issue, but the commandment I cited was that he lied. He doesn't believe that.

My second argument was consistent with that.

Politicians all lie, but when he's using the Bible to lie, that's another level of lie

Obama did little to nothing and Biden will do the same but that doesn't mean we shouldn't abide by the words I quoted.

So you support nuclear power and fracking for natural gas to replace coal plants?

I am NOT against power as we can not completely turn away from it today BUT I am for increasing our investments into alternative sources.

If you don't, you don't believe it either. Those are the only things in our current level of technology that would make a difference big enough to matter.

Going to "renewable" energy is not in our current technical ability, any more than traveling to another galaxy. We aren't to the point we can do that. Any honest analysis of renewable fuels will compellingly convince you of that.

So is this a REAL issue to you or just a political one, like Joe Biden?

We are indeed turning more to alternatives. You can deny that if you wish but we are. Are alternatives may not be perfect yet but they are steps in the right direction. The direction the Bible leads us to.

That doesn't contradict what I said.

I did NOT say that we can't produce ANY power with renewable energy. What I said is it can't replace in any meaningful way enough energy to replace our current energy production with renewable energy.

We are replacing it all the time. I don't really care to try and argue over what is "meaningful". We are expanding renewable energy every year. That is the path we need to continue to take. We need to step up investments into renewable sources.

We've sunk massive amounts of money into renewable energy, and it barely makes a dent in slowing the growth of other energy.

We simply aren't technologically advanced enough to replace our current system with renewable, we're probably a century from that at least.

Nuclear power is the ONLY zero emissions energy source that produces a significant amount of energy.

And natural gas is significantly cleaner than coal or other fossil fuels.

If emissions is this important to you, how the hell can you not want to rely on the ONLY two things that would actually work here and now with our current level of technology and not wreck our economies? How does that make sense?

Nuclear is not zero emission. Nuclears emissions are simply a different type. Emissions that we leave to future generations to deal with.

Emissions refers to carbon emissions. Yes, nuclear is zero emissions.

Waste is waste.

And so we have that you are all about the environment, but you pass on two things we could do today with our current level of technology that would dramatically reduce carbon emissions for no reason you can describe.

Well, you are like Biden. Global warming isn't an issue for you, it's an opportunity

The facts are you can argue this all day but no one is going to build a new nuclear plant. Too expensive, too much risk and no one wants one near them.

 

[whitehall]

Let it go lefties. Nitpicking every word the President utters while ignoring the mental illness of the democrat candidate only makes you look foolish.

 

[kaz]

Trump says Biden is 'against God'

President Trump attacked former Vice President Joe Biden on Thursday by accusing him of being “against God.”

www.yahoo.com

“He’s following the radical left agenda: take away your guns, destroy your Second Amendment, no religion, no anything, hurt the Bible, hurt God,” Trump said during a campaign visit to Ohio. “He’s against God, he’s against guns.”

Right of course. It clearly says in the Bible “Don't turn the other cheek. Shoot him!”

I’m so glad we have a moron like Trump to point out to us the lost passages in the Bible about semi-automatic weapons.

Well, coveting your neighbor's property and stealing are against the Ten Commandments and Biden is a major wealth envy let's rob them at gunpoint advocate. Leftists also worship government over God. That's three right there.

And then there's Biden claiming global warming is a religious issue. I try not to pull lying into politics because they are politicians and it's the nature of the beast, but using religion to justify something like that really is bearing false witness. My God, that's sick

You shall not pollute the land in which you live, for blood pollutes the land, and no atonement can be made for the land for the blood that is shed in it, except by the blood of the one who shed it. You shall not defile the land in which you live, in the midst of which I dwell, for I the Lord dwell in the midst of the people of Israel.”

Numbers 35: 33-34

Except there's the big lie. Democrats don't believe in global warming. There are two things we could start doing now that would have a massive affect on carbon emissions and would not wreck our economy, and Democrats oppose both of them. Those are nuclear power and fracking for natural gas.

Instead Democrats want to dump trillions into socialism, like the minimum income, and pretend that's a green policy.

You want to know what isn't green, biofuel, and you do support that. It's massive carbon emissions.

Democrats have absolutely zero support for reducing greenhouse gasses, It's just a political opportunity to you

Two different issues. One is whether or not the Democrats believe what they say and the other is whether or not environmental issues are in the Bible.

I replied to the statement that it was not. It is.

I see your point, but that doesn't really contradict me. My argument was that when Biden said global warming was a religious issue, but the commandment I cited was that he lied. He doesn't believe that.

My second argument was consistent with that.

Politicians all lie, but when he's using the Bible to lie, that's another level of lie

Obama did little to nothing and Biden will do the same but that doesn't mean we shouldn't abide by the words I quoted.

So you support nuclear power and fracking for natural gas to replace coal plants?

I am NOT against power as we can not completely turn away from it today BUT I am for increasing our investments into alternative sources.

If you don't, you don't believe it either. Those are the only things in our current level of technology that would make a difference big enough to matter.

Going to "renewable" energy is not in our current technical ability, any more than traveling to another galaxy. We aren't to the point we can do that. Any honest analysis of renewable fuels will compellingly convince you of that.

So is this a REAL issue to you or just a political one, like Joe Biden?

We are indeed turning more to alternatives. You can deny that if you wish but we are. Are alternatives may not be perfect yet but they are steps in the right direction. The direction the Bible leads us to.

That doesn't contradict what I said.

I did NOT say that we can't produce ANY power with renewable energy. What I said is it can't replace in any meaningful way enough energy to replace our current energy production with renewable energy.

We are replacing it all the time. I don't really care to try and argue over what is "meaningful". We are expanding renewable energy every year. That is the path we need to continue to take. We need to step up investments into renewable sources.

We've sunk massive amounts of money into renewable energy, and it barely makes a dent in slowing the growth of other energy.

We simply aren't technologically advanced enough to replace our current system with renewable, we're probably a century from that at least.

Nuclear power is the ONLY zero emissions energy source that produces a significant amount of energy.

And natural gas is significantly cleaner than coal or other fossil fuels.

If emissions is this important to you, how the hell can you not want to rely on the ONLY two things that would actually work here and now with our current level of technology and not wreck our economies? How does that make sense?

Nuclear is not zero emission. Nuclears emissions are simply a different type. Emissions that we leave to future generations to deal with.

Emissions refers to carbon emissions. Yes, nuclear is zero emissions.

Waste is waste.

And so we have that you are all about the environment, but you pass on two things we could do today with our current level of technology that would dramatically reduce carbon emissions for no reason you can describe.

Well, you are like Biden. Global warming isn't an issue for you, it's an opportunity

The facts are you can argue this all day but no one is going to build a new nuclear plant. Too expensive, too much risk and no one wants one near them.

Waste is waste? So now it's no longer about global warming or climate change. It's that you want energy with no by products at all. Well they all fail at that. Even solar, wind and dams fail that standard. So now you want no energy at all?

Why are you on a computer then?

 

[kaz]

The facts are you can argue this all day but no one is going to build a new nuclear plant. Too expensive, too much risk and no one wants one near them.

And so you concede the debate. It's not about global warming at all. We're good

 

[pknopp]

The facts are you can argue this all day but no one is going to build a new nuclear plant. Too expensive, too much risk and no one wants one near them.

And so you concede the debate. It's not about global warming at all. We're good

A solution that is not a solution is not a solution. I could agree with you all day on nuclear and it matters none. You argue nuclear because you know it isn't going to happen. You think it's a "gotcha" when in reality your solution is not a solution. It's not going to happen. We will continue forward with renewable sources.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

But the armed shall inherit the land and delight themselves in grabbing women by the pussy


Trump 37:11

He never said that but you keep perpetuating the lie. Why?

Sarcasm. You knew that though.

Not your second part. He never said that why did you insinuate that he did?

He did say the second part. He didn't actually say the first but that completed the verse.

Nope. He never said the 2nd part. He said they LET you grab them. Big difference. Shows consent vs. wanton misbehavior. Funny how you and your ilk consistently leave that magic three letter word out.

We've seen how this "Let you" works. It works in the head of the perpetrator. We have had may women come forward that wanted this kind of action addressed but they knew no one would take them seriously. Those like yourself still do not. That's unfortunate. Bill Cosby didn't think he was doing anything wrong either.

Nope. He said when you're famous and rich girls throw themselves at you. It was not remotely made as a term that he forces himself on women. But you knew that. Cosby used fame to force girls to have relations for work and drugged them. Trump HAS NEVER been accused of it.

 

[pknopp]

But the armed shall inherit the land and delight themselves in grabbing women by the pussy


Trump 37:11

He never said that but you keep perpetuating the lie. Why?

Sarcasm. You knew that though.

Not your second part. He never said that why did you insinuate that he did?

He did say the second part. He didn't actually say the first but that completed the verse.

Nope. He never said the 2nd part. He said they LET you grab them. Big difference. Shows consent vs. wanton misbehavior. Funny how you and your ilk consistently leave that magic three letter word out.

We've seen how this "Let you" works. It works in the head of the perpetrator. We have had may women come forward that wanted this kind of action addressed but they knew no one would take them seriously. Those like yourself still do not. That's unfortunate. Bill Cosby didn't think he was doing anything wrong either.

Nope. He said when you're famous and rich girls throw themselves at you. It was not remotely made as a term that he forces himself on women. But you knew that. Cosby used fame to force girls to have relations for work and drugged them. Trump HAS NEVER been accused of it.

I have no desire to do this again. This is the same guy that wished Giselle Maxwell well.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

But the armed shall inherit the land and delight themselves in grabbing women by the pussy


Trump 37:11

He never said that but you keep perpetuating the lie. Why?

Sarcasm. You knew that though.

Not your second part. He never said that why did you insinuate that he did?

He did say the second part. He didn't actually say the first but that completed the verse.

Nope. He never said the 2nd part. He said they LET you grab them. Big difference. Shows consent vs. wanton misbehavior. Funny how you and your ilk consistently leave that magic three letter word out.

We've seen how this "Let you" works. It works in the head of the perpetrator. We have had may women come forward that wanted this kind of action addressed but they knew no one would take them seriously. Those like yourself still do not. That's unfortunate. Bill Cosby didn't think he was doing anything wrong either.

Nope. He said when you're famous and rich girls throw themselves at you. It was not remotely made as a term that he forces himself on women. But you knew that. Cosby used fame to force girls to have relations for work and drugged them. Trump HAS NEVER been accused of it.

I have no desire to do this again. This is the same guy that wished Giselle Maxwell well.

You have no desire because you know I am right. Happy to drop it.

 

[Lysistrata]

Trump says Biden is 'against God'

President Trump attacked former Vice President Joe Biden on Thursday by accusing him of being “against God.”

www.yahoo.com

“He’s following the radical left agenda: take away your guns, destroy your Second Amendment, no religion, no anything, hurt the Bible, hurt God,” Trump said during a campaign visit to Ohio. “He’s against God, he’s against guns.”

Right of course. It clearly says in the Bible “Don't turn the other cheek. Shoot him!”

I’m so glad we have a moron like Trump to point out to us the lost passages in the Bible about semi-automatic weapons.

trump's statement has to be the most ridiculous statement ever to come out of a U.S. chief executive's mouth. Not only was it totally insulting to Biden, his attempt to link the Christian faith with guns was grossly insulting to the faith.

 

[anynameyouwish]

Trump says Biden is 'against God'

President Trump attacked former Vice President Joe Biden on Thursday by accusing him of being “against God.”

www.yahoo.com

“He’s following the radical left agenda: take away your guns, destroy your Second Amendment, no religion, no anything, hurt the Bible, hurt God,” Trump said during a campaign visit to Ohio. “He’s against God, he’s against guns.”

Right of course. It clearly says in the Bible “Don't turn the other cheek. Shoot him!”

I’m so glad we have a moron like Trump to point out to us the lost passages in the Bible about semi-automatic weapons.

How is trump on that "though shalt not commit adultery" thing? or "Though shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor" thing? If you are outside listening to trump talk about God, even on a sunny day you better run for cover in a well grounded structure.

trump has violated all of the seven deadly sins.

trump has violated all but one of the Ten Commandments.

and I'll bet he has actually had people killed.....

 

[bottlecap]

Trump says Biden is 'against God'

President Trump attacked former Vice President Joe Biden on Thursday by accusing him of being “against God.”

www.yahoo.com

“He’s following the radical left agenda: take away your guns, destroy your Second Amendment, no religion, no anything, hurt the Bible, hurt God,” Trump said during a campaign visit to Ohio. “He’s against God, he’s against guns.”

Right of course. It clearly says in the Bible “Don't turn the other cheek. Shoot him!”

I’m so glad we have a moron like Trump to point out to us the lost passages in the Bible about semi-automatic weapons.

Trump says Biden is 'against God'

President Trump attacked former Vice President Joe Biden on Thursday by accusing him of being “against God.”

www.yahoo.com

“He’s following the radical left agenda: take away your guns, destroy your Second Amendment, no religion, no anything, hurt the Bible, hurt God,” Trump said during a campaign visit to Ohio. “He’s against God, he’s against guns.”

Right of course. It clearly says in the Bible “Don't turn the other cheek. Shoot him!”

I’m so glad we have a moron like Trump to point out to us the lost passages in the Bible about semi-automatic weapons.

Trumps not exactly the world's greatest public speaker ...you guys just realizing it now?

Never has been never will be ....
The problem is joe has a hard time articulating everything

Your only hope is the us mail lol

Trump has live press conferences with reporters who hate him. Senile Joe cannot even talk to a friendly reporter with making a racists comments.

 

[kaz]

The facts are you can argue this all day but no one is going to build a new nuclear plant. Too expensive, too much risk and no one wants one near them.

And so you concede the debate. It's not about global warming at all. We're good

A solution that is not a solution is not a solution. I could agree with you all day on nuclear and it matters none. You argue nuclear because you know it isn't going to happen. You think it's a "gotcha" when in reality your solution is not a solution. It's not going to happen. We will continue forward with renewable sources.

You don't actually care about global warming other than the opportunity to get socialism. Typical Democrat. I gave you a shot and you couldn't go beyond other Democrats on that.

I'm not the pie in the sky guy, you are. You're going to go with a solution that won't be viable for a century or more and pass on two straight forward solutions we could do today. Democrat Party runs on the allure of free stuff

 

[pknopp]

The facts are you can argue this all day but no one is going to build a new nuclear plant. Too expensive, too much risk and no one wants one near them.

And so you concede the debate. It's not about global warming at all. We're good

A solution that is not a solution is not a solution. I could agree with you all day on nuclear and it matters none. You argue nuclear because you know it isn't going to happen. You think it's a "gotcha" when in reality your solution is not a solution. It's not going to happen. We will continue forward with renewable sources.

You don't actually care about global warming other than the opportunity to get socialism. Typical Democrat. I gave you a shot and you couldn't go beyond other Democrats on that.

Is Tesla an example of this Socialism?

I'm not the pie in the sky guy, you are. You're going to go with a solution that won't be viable for a century or more and pass on two straight forward solutions we could do today. Democrat Party runs on the allure of free stuff

We can't do your solution. No one wants to do it. For some odd reason you continue to ignore that.

 

[kaz]

The facts are you can argue this all day but no one is going to build a new nuclear plant. Too expensive, too much risk and no one wants one near them.

And so you concede the debate. It's not about global warming at all. We're good

A solution that is not a solution is not a solution. I could agree with you all day on nuclear and it matters none. You argue nuclear because you know it isn't going to happen. You think it's a "gotcha" when in reality your solution is not a solution. It's not going to happen. We will continue forward with renewable sources.

You don't actually care about global warming other than the opportunity to get socialism. Typical Democrat. I gave you a shot and you couldn't go beyond other Democrats on that.

Is Tesla an example of this Socialism?

I'm not the pie in the sky guy, you are. You're going to go with a solution that won't be viable for a century or more and pass on two straight forward solutions we could do today. Democrat Party runs on the allure of free stuff

We can't do your solution. No one wants to do it. For some odd reason you continue to ignore that.

Ignoring it? WTF. That's my POINT.

Nuclear is the ONLY large scale zero emissions energy production solution that we have, and Democrats oppose it. That's exactly what I'm saying. You are NOT environmentalists. You're environmental opportunists using a catastrophe you don't believe will happen to get socialism.

Note you stopped responding to fracking for natural gas, which is also a huge environmentalist solution for an environmentalist who means it solution as well. There are may coal plants we could shut down across the globe and replace them with natural gas and greatly reduce emissions