- Dec 15, 2008
- Reaction score
do know what waffling means?.....i have said the same thing since we began this....some people think when all the participants are there and on the field the game is there too whether its begun or not.....if the guy kneels during the anthem and all the other players start following his lead.....he brought it into the game.......No, the difference is you're waffling on what your point is. Roll tape.the difference between me and you seems to be, you think those guys are not part of the team until the game begins,while i think they are the minute they step on the field whether its begun or not.....Of course it does. Those 50,000 or however many people in the stands are, as I just pointed out, a captive audience. They're been lured there for the purpose of watching a game. That's EXACTLY why the Pentagon taxpayer-funded fetishism folderol takes place JUST BEFORE the game. They know the multitudes are assembled for a completely different purpose and will be forced to sit through whatever puppet theater they choose to throw out.what those guys do when on the field in uniform whether the game is going or not has an effect on the fans,this could be positive or negative.....I've already explained to you that it was NOT in the game. NOR was your Angels player. So what's the point?i did make a point you just dont want to accept it......when the guy suited up he was on the clock and when he stepped out on the field and did his shit were everyone could see he brought it into the game....You've got to make a point before it can be got Harry....geezus forget it pogo....you wouldnt get the point even if it poked you in the eye....So this baseball player did his own thing in uniform, fine --- what's your point?it doesnt matter if it hasnt started yet....once the guy suits up he is on the so called clock.....when he leaves the locker room in his own clothes he is on his time....and i am getting this from a California Angel player who got shit for not signing autographs after the game in the parking lot on the way to his car....he told the press when i am in uniform in that stadium i am on the clock so to speak,when the game is over and i am on my way to my car,thats my time,and if i dont want to stop to sign autographs,thats my prerogative......to be fair to this player he signed plenty during batting practice,which he also pointed out.....The game hadn't started yet, NOR was it broadcast, PLUS he was on the field only because the NFL started ordering they be on the field for Paid Patriotism Theater only some ten years back.if he was in uniform and on the field he brought it into the game...NO, he brought it onto the bench, OUTSIDE the sporting event, before the game, and nobody even noticed the first few times, until some photographer who according to the Fetishism Logic was supposed to be standing in rapt zombie posture drooling over a piece of cloth, instead looked around and snapped a picture, after which the drones were instructed to be 'outraged' over a piece of an event that they didn't even know about since it isn't part of the broadcast, after which said drones fell all over themselves to comply. So it was in fact before the game AND on his own time.it doesnt matter whose idea it was....he brought into a sporting event....he could have brought his gripe up after the game on his own time....But Trumpsters don't make everything political.The libs do make everything political. But the NFL decided to celebrate Kaepernick for his protests against Veterans, instead of reprimanding him or even ignoring him.It's not about politics. It is only made political by those who make pretty much EVERYTHING political.
And you don't even know what they're kneeling for. AND you don't even know it was a veteran's idea that he kneel.
More comedy from the alternative universe. Arrogant ignorance. Good stuff.
The hypocrisy is so thick you could cut it with a knife.
So no, it has never been part of the game at all. It's been part of a fetishism theater that's located at the same place the game is, put there to foist said fetishism on a captive audience.
Once AGAIN you started out saying "he brought it into the game". I showed how it was not in the game, then you went "doesn't matter, here's an Angels player who did/didn't do something else that was also not in the game". What's your point?
Let's be clear --- neither hanging out to sign autographs, NOR a paid patriotism fetishism theater, are part of any game. At all. NEITHER of these actions/nonactions were part of a game which was not being played at the time.
But, and you keep running away from this.... it isn't part of the game. The game begins when the foot of the kicking team contacts the football -- the kickoff. All that puppet theater going on around the benches, the pompoms, the flag -- that's all prefatory pomp and circumstance, the latter of which isn't even related to the game.
As for whether it's 'positive or negative" we're right back to the paid whiners demanding fetishism on cue and obediently drooling at the mouth about some 'blasphemy' they never would have even seen if some gadfly with no life hadn't coached them to froth at the mouth so color me unimpressed by coerced mob mentality.
I know what's part of the game and what isn't sooooooooooo.................you would know this if you were a sports fan.... and dont tell me you are because i would not have to tell this to a fan,they know this already...
Not "he brought it onto the team" but "he brought it into the game. It isn't the game.if he was in uniform and on the field he brought it into the game...